• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제9권10호
• /
• pp.349-359
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 브랜드확장 평가에 대한 범주화 평가과정 모델(categorical evaluation processes model)을 참고하여 유통경로 유형별 광고태도(Aad), 점포태도, 브랜드태도(Ab), 브랜드확장 평가도, 확장제품 구매의도들 간의 구조적인 관계에서 영향력의 차이를 실증적으로 검증하려 하였다. 연구 결과, "유통경로 유형 모 브랜드태도가 브랜드확장 평가도와 확장제품 구매의도에 미치는 영향의 정도에 차이가 있을 것이다." 라는 여섯 가지 가설 중에서 점포태도와 브랜드태도와의 관계, 브랜드태도와 브랜드확장 평가도와의 관계, 브랜드확장 평가도와 확장제품 구매의도와의 각 이론변수간의 관계에서만 각 유통경로 유형별로 영향력이 다르게 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서, 유통경로 유형별 브랜드확장평가는 모 브랜드태도와 브랜드확장평가도와의 관계를 소비자관점에서 구조적으로 분석하여야 하며 이는 브랜드확장 제품 유통경로구조 개선에 중요한 정보를 제공하고 브랜드확장 성공률을 높일 수 있다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 2000년도 춘계공동학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.445-448
• /
• 2000

Researches about an evaluation system for military officers have been studied because it is one of the most important elements for managing units and improving combat power. This paper proposes an evaluation system that enhance justice of evaluation, accomplish a distintion among evaluating elements and improve synergy effects between higher level officers and lower level officers. The evaluation system in this study not only suggests evaluating items and methods but also determines the final evaluation ranking among the evaluated that have their own evaluation criteria, items and duties using the median rank method used in statistics.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.25-34
• /
• 2004

CC(=ISO/IEC 15408)는 정보보호시스템의 국제표준이며 CC평가 및 인증체계에서는 평가기관 운영하며 평가기관에서는 적정한 평가비 산정을 위한 근거가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 특정한 평가기관의 환경이 아니라, CC기준과 기존의 PP 및 ST만을 바탕으로 하여, 제품유형별 및 보증수준별 평가업무량 모델을 제시하였으며, 평가실무자득의 경험, 보안기능의 사용율 개념 및 기능점수방법 등을 이용하였다. 본 결과는 CC평가환경에서 정보보호제품의 평가비 및 기간의 산정을 위한 기본자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.37-54
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to present an evaluation model to measure the clarification level of stakeholder requirements of public sector software projects in the Republic of Korea. We tried to grasp the quality of proposal request through evaluation model. It also examines the impact of the level of stakeholder requirements on the level of system requirements. To do this, we analyzed existing research models and related standards related to business requirements and stakeholder requirements, and constructed evaluation models for the system operation concept documents in the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148. The system operation concept document is a document prepared by organizing the requirements of stakeholders in the organization and sharing the intention of the organization. The evaluation model proposed in this study focuses on evaluating whether the contents related to the system operation concept are faithfully written in the request for proposal. The evaluation items consisted of three items: 'organization status', 'desired changes', and 'operational constraints'. The sample extracted 217 RFPs in the national procurement system. As a result of the analysis, the evaluation model proved to be valid and the internal consistency was maintained. The level of system operation concept was very low, and it was also found to affect the quality of system requirements. It is more important to clearly write stakeholders' requirements than the functional requirements. we propose a news classification methods for sentiment analysis that is effective for bankruptcy prediction model.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제6권5호
• /
• pp.325-332
• /
• 2014

PURPOSE. The aim of this review was to analyze the evaluation criteria on mandibular implant overdentures through a systematic review and suggest standardized evaluation criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic literature search was conducted by PubMed search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) and clinical trial studies comparing attachment systems on mandibular implant overdentures until December, 2011 were selected. Twenty nine studies were finally selected and the data about evaluation methods were collected. RESULTS. Evaluation criteria could be classified into 4 groups (implant survival, peri-implant tissue evaluation, prosthetic evaluation, and patient satisfaction). Among 29 studies, 21 studies presented implant survival rate, while any studies reporting implant failure did not present cumulative implant survival rate. Seventeen studies evaluating peri-implant tissue status presented following items as evaluation criteria; marginal bone level (14), plaque Index (13), probing depth (8), bleeding index (8), attachment gingiva level (8), gingival index (6), amount of keratinized gingiva (1). Eighteen studies evaluating prosthetic maintenance and complication also presented following items as evaluation criteria; loose matrix (17), female detachment (15), denture fracture (15), denture relining (14), abutment fracture (14), abutment screw loosening (11), and occlusal adjustment (9). Atypical questionnaire (9), Visual analog scales (VAS) (4), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) (1) were used as the format of criteria to evaluate patients satisfaction in 14 studies. CONCLUSION. For evaluation of implant overdenture, it is necessary to include cumulative survival rate for implant evaluation. It is suggested that peri-implant tissue evaluation criteria include marginal bone level, plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and attached gingiva level. It is also suggested that prosthetic evaluation criteria include loose matrix, female detachment, denture fracture, denture relining, abutment fracture, abutment screw loosening, and occlusal adjustment. Finally standardized criteria like OHIP-EDENT or VAS are required for patient satisfaction.

• 말소리와 음성과학
• /
• 제2권4호
• /
• pp.193-212
• /
• 2010

The purpose of our study was to provide effective speech evaluation items examining the variables of speech that successfully predict the speech intelligibility in CP children. The subjects were 55 children with spastic type cerebral palsy. As for the speech evaluation, we performed a speech subsystem evaluation and a speech intelligibility test. The results of the study are as follows. The evaluation task for the speech subsystems consisted of 48 task items within an observational evaluation stage and three levels of severity. The levels showed correlations with gross motor functions, fine motor functions, and age. Second, the evaluation items for the speech subsystems were rearranged into seven factors. Third, 34 out of 48 task items that positively correlated with the syllable intelligibility rating were as follows. There were four items in the observational evaluation stage. Among the nonverbal articulatory function evaluation items, there were 11 items in level one. There were 12 items in level two. In level three there were eight items. Fourth, there were 23 items among the 48 evaluation tasks that correlated with the sentence intelligibility rating. There was one item in the observational evaluation stage which was in the articulatory structure evaluation task. In level one there were six items. In level two, there were eight items. In level three, there was a total number of eight items. Fifth, there was a total number of 14 items that influenced the syllable intelligibility rating. Sixth, there was a total number of 13 items that influenced the syllable intelligibility rating. According to the results above, the variables that influenced the speech intelligibility of CP children among the articulatory function tasks were in the respiratory function task, phonatory function task, and lip and chin related tasks. We did not find any correlation for the tongue function. The results of our study could be applied to speech evaluation, setting therapy goals, and evaluating the degree of progression in children with CP. We only studied children with the spastic type of cerebral palsy, and there were a small number of severe degree CP children compared to those with a moderate degree of CP. Therefore, when evaluating children with other degrees of severity, we may have to take their characteristics more into account. Further study on speech evaluation variables in relation to the severity of the speech intelligibility and different types of cerebral palsy may be necessary.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제54권1호
• /
• pp.27-38
• /
• 2016

Objectives: This study evaluated the outcomes of continuing professional education in implant dentistry using Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model. Material and methods: The study was carried out through a questionnaire distributed to dentists who attended a continuing professional education in implant dentistry, 2008~2012. They were asked to fill out questionnaires at least 6 months after its completion. Results: Mean ages of total 23 dentist was $44.8^{\circ}{\ae}8.2$. Mean period after completion of education was $2.7^{\circ}{\ae}1.2$. Knowledge (level 2) (r=0.71, p<0.01) and behavior (level 3) (r=0.68, p<0.01) was positively correlated with topic and methods of education in reaction (level 1). Behavior was positively correlated with knowledge (r=0.79, p<0.01). Result (level 4) was positively correlated with knowledge (r=0.64, p<0.01) and behavior (r=0.86, p<0.01). Conclusion: Reaction affects on knowledge, behavior and result in order.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.27-37
• /
• 2011

It is not uncommon to witness brand image transference which is a development of corporate image from a collection of individual brand images. The brand image transfer process is the influence of consumer attitudes toward certain brands on overall evaluation of the company. To understand the image transfer process, we examine the influence of brand level evaluation on overall company evaluation through food and beverage consumer products in China, where active competitions among global brands exist.

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 기존 건물의 내진성능평가 요령의 개선안을 바탕으로 비보강 조적조 건물의 내진성능을 평가하였다. 평가 절차는 예비평가, 1차상세평가, 2차상세평가의 3단계로 구성되어 있으며, 보수적인 평가로 시작하여 점차 상세한 평가를 실시한다. 본 연구의 목적은 이와 같은 단계적 평가의 실효성을 검증하고 평가결과와 조적조 벽량과의 상관관계를 분석하는 것이다. 연구를 위해 10개의 2층 비보강 조적조 건물을 선택한 후 3단계 절차를 이용하여 단계별로 성능평가를 수행하였다. 연구 결과, 예비평가와 1차상세평가간에 성능수준이 절차의 의도와 역행해서 나타났다. 따라서 앞으로 본 연구 결과에서 나타난 각 평가 단계별 문제점을 보완할 필요가 있다.

• 한국지능시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.411-419
• /
• 1999

본 논문은 수정고유벡터법과 퍼지종속관계를 이용한 시스템 수준의 평가방법을 제안한다. 이 모델은 기업에 있어서 시스템의 수준을 평가하기 위하여 설계되었다. 여기서 수정고유벡터법은 두평가그룹에 있어서 각 평가기준의 가중치를 계산하기 위하여 제안되었다. 또한 퍼지종속관계는 일대비교에 의한 편가기준간의 관계를 평가하는데 사용된다. 본 논문에서는 시스템의 현재수준의 평가치를 구하여 시스템의 운영 및 개선에 도움을 주고자 하며 제안하는 방법의 유효성을 환경경영시스템의 평가문제에 대한 사례연구를 통하여 보이고자 한다.