• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제21권
• /
• pp.99-127
• /
• 2003

Legal sources of fraud rule in documentary letter of credit, which have their origin in Sztejn Case can be traced to various rules or laws of international or domestic level ; URCG, URDG and ISP98 as ICC Rules, and UNCITRAL Convention as an international uniform law, and UCC as a domestic law and U.K. cases. Among them the combination of "material fraud" in UCC ${\S}5-109$ and the detailed list of the types of misconduct in UNCITRAL Convention may provide the best solution or standard in real application of the fraud rule in letter of credit transaction.

• 분석과 대안
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.89-103
• /
• 2020

The "rule of law" decision of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China proposes to build a strict supervision system of the rule of law. The reform of the national supervision system launched in 2016 can be described as an important measure to build such a system. The supervision and supervision system has gradually become the core system of the rule of law supervision system. Its full coverage of supervision of public officials is conducive to preventing corruption of public power and achieving the ultimate goal of supervision by the rule of law. The supervision mechanism in the supervision system under the rule of law requires systemic thinking to realize the effective supervision of public officials of the state power organs, as well as the constraints and supervision of other supervision systems, including the supervision of the People's Congress; Supervision is a full-coverage supervision, and other rules of law supervision systems are also full-coverage supervision systems within their scope of competence. Therefore, gradually exploring and constructing an external supervision system for supervision will be conducive to the optimization and eventual completion of the rule of law supervision system.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제19권11호
• /
• pp.105-113
• /
• 2014

본 논문에서는 법령 온톨로지 구축을 위해 법령의 구조적 특징과 요소 간의 관계에 대해 분석 정리하고 정리된 내용을 바탕으로 OWL DL 수준의 매핑 규칙을 제안한다. 제안하는 매핑 규칙은 국내 법령 관계의 상-하위 구조, 법령의 고유 속성, 법률 간의 참조 관계와 같은 구조적인 관계의 TBox를 구축하는 방법과 법률 문장을 분석하여 조문 규정 별로 나타나는 문장의 패턴 유형을 선별, ABox로 구축될 수 있는 요소를 표현한다. 제안된 매핑 규칙은 일반 텍스트로 설명되고 있는 국내의 법령을 컴퓨터가 이해 가능한 수준의 정보로 변환 되어 법령 지식 베이스로 활용 가능하다.

• 서비스연구
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 서비스주의 경제, 정치행정, 사회교육 시스템을 구현하는 바탕이 되는 법제도 모델 도출을 위해 수행되었다. 지난 역사시대 5천여년간 인류의 법제도 운용 경험을 토대로 미래 인류사회를 지속가능하게 할 새로운 법제도 모델을 도출하였다. 인류 역사에서 시도된 여러 법제도 시스템을 통해 현대사회에 바람직한 법제도시스템의 구조를 설계하였다. 좋은 법제도가 인간의 비이성과 비상식에 의해 얼마나 오용되어 왔고 오용되고 있는지를 경험한 인류사회는 실패를 통해 교훈을 얻어 법제도 패러다임 자체를 바꾸는 노력을 할 필요가 있는 것이다. 현재 법제도시스템의 문제점을 근본적 차원에서 분석하였다. 정의와 공정이 바로 서지 못하는 근본 원인을 분석하고, 새로운 법제도 시스템을 설계하였다. 본 연구는 장기적으로 정의와 공정사회를 구현할 수 있도록 법제도시스템의 기반을 도출하였다. 인류사회가 오래도록 행복할 수 있는 법제도 개선 모델을 제안하였다. 이를 위해 사상적 차원에서 법제도시스템의 근본 역할을 분석하고 현재 법제도의 문제점을 제시하였다. 또한 인간의 본성에 대한 근본 가정상의 문제점을 분석하고, 개선된 가정을 제시하였다. 현재 법제도시스템의 구조적 체계를 분석하고 새로운 구조를 제시하였다. 새로운 구조에 의한 새로운 법제도 운용 방안을 제시하였다. 새로운 법제도시스템은 서비스주의 시스템으로 명명되었다. 모든 대립자들간의 철저한 견제와 균형이 중심이 되는 모델이기 때문이며, 단순 선형 1차원 법제도시스템이 아니라 다차원적 법제도시스템이기 때문이고, 또한 인간의 비이성과 욕망을 뚜렷하게 인정하는 관점이기 때문이다. 새로운 시스템은 법치와 비법치의 대립, 성선설과 성악설의 대립, 법제정 운용자와 피운용자간의 대립, 권력자와 일반시민간의 대립 등을 모두 반영하는 모델이다. 현 법제도에서 새로운 법제도시스템으로 전환하는 구체적인 방안에 대한 후속 연구가 필요하다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.455-492
• /
• 2009

(Background) Recent biotechnological breakthroughs are shedding new lights on various ethical and legal issues about human biological material. Since Rudolph Virchow, a German pathologist, had founded the medical discipline of cellular pathology, issues centering around human biological materials began to draw attention. The issues involving human biological materials were revisited with more attention along with series concerns when the human genome map was finally completed. Recently, with researches on human genes and bioengineering reaping enormous commercial values in the form of material patent, such changes require a society to reassess the present and future status of human tissue within the legal system. This in turn gave rise to a heated debate over how to protect the rights of material donors: property rule vs. no property rule. (Debate and Cases) Property rule recognizes the donors' property rights on human biological materials. Thus, donors can claim real action if there were any bleach of informed consent or a donation contract. Donors can also claim damages to the responsible party when there is an infringement of property rights. Some even uphold the concept of material patents overtaking. From the viewpoint of no property rule, human biological materials are objects separated from donors. Thus, a recipient or a third party will be held liable if there were any infringement of donor's human rights. Human biological materials should not be commercially traded and a patent based on a human biological materials research does not belong to the donor of the tissues used during the course of research. In the US, two courts, Moore v. Regents of the University of California, and Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute, Inc., have already decided that research participants retain no ownership of the biological specimens they contribute to medical research. Significantly, both Moore and Greenberg cases found that the researcher had parted with all ownership rights in the tissue samples when they donated them to the institutions, even though there was no provision in the informed consent forms stating either that the participants donated their tissue or waived their rights to ownership of the tissue. These rulings were led to huge controversy over property rights on human tissues. This research supports no property rule on the ground that it can protect the human dignity and prevent humans from objectification and commercialization. Human biological materials are already parted from human bodies and should be treated differently from the engineering and researches of those materials. Donors do not retain any ownership. (Suggestions) No property rule requires a legal breakthrough in the US in terms of donors' rights protection due to the absence of punitive damages provisions. The Donor rights issue on human biological material can be addressed through prospective legislation or tax policies, price control over patent products, and wider coverage of medical insurance. (Conclusions) Amid growing awareness over commercial values of human biological materials, no property rule should be adopted in order to protect human dignity but not without revamping legal provisions. The donors' rights issue in material patents requires prospective legislation based on current uncertainties. Also should be sought are solutions in the social context and all these discussions should be based on sound medical ethics of both medical staffs and researchers.

• 한국BIM학회 논문집
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.30-38
• /
• 2022

Railway is compsed in various components, such as subgrade, track bed, sleeper, rail, and overhead line, on a linear space. Therefore, comprehensive work for various design standards and guidelines is required when designing a railway facility. For this reason, much time and effort are required to review the relevant design standards and guidelines. While, automatic legal check system for BIM models has been developed in the architectural engineering, it has not been developed in the railway engineering. This study reviews the korean design standard and the korean code for railway engineering, and suggests some rule items of logical information. Comparing the suggested rule items to the railway BIM library, items of logical information and additional attribute information are obtained. The analysis results of railway design standards and BIM library presented in this study would be utilized for defining rule-set items that is essential for development of the automatic legal check system for railway BIM models.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.116-124
• /
• 1999

Cyber education and teacher training is the distance training program which is operating in the Korea National University of Education for teachers and citizen. In this paper, we suggest a model for establishing legal basis of cyber teacher training, by analyzing laws and processing-laws in the parliament and cyber teacher training institutes. The model contain 'The Rule for Operating CTTI(Cyber Teacher Training Institute)', 'The Rule for Using CIT Systems', 'The Rule for Operation CIT'.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.91-125
• /
• 2006

The arbitration rule of CIETAC was vastly revised and was put in force on May 1, 2005. By its revision, China has improved its arbitration system. Chinese arbitration law had many problems when it was enacted in 1995, but the problems could not be avoided because of the poor surroundings for arbitration in China. As China has not had much experience in operating its legal system effectively, and also has little in the way of studies on legal theory that would allow it to deal with its laws in a flexible manner, authorities usually wait to revise a law until enough relevant experience has been accumulated. Therefore, during the 10 years since its enactment, China has resolved the problems within its arbitration law through revision of arbitration rule rather than by revision of the law itself. As this law is a basic one in ruling the arbitration system in China, there are some limitations as to how far the system can be developed through revision of arbitration rule alone. In spite of the limitations, the revision in 2005 contributed a great deal to resolving the existing problems within Chinese arbitration law. The biggest problem in the arbitration law is the Chinese arbitration law that restricts party autonomy. With the revision of the arbitration rule, many problems concerning party autonomy were circumvented. This occurred because the arbitration rule now provides parties the opportunity to choose arbitration rule other than the CIETAC arbitration rule, and even allows parties to agree to amend articles in the CIETAC arbitration rule -- a very important revision indeed. In addition to party autonomy, there are other improvements for example, there is an enhancement of the independent character of the CIETAC, clearing of jurisdiction, easing in the formation of arbitration agreement, improvement in the way arbitrators are chosen, and enhancement in the cultural neutrality of the arbiter. Problems still remain that can only be solved by revision of the arbitration law itself. These problems relate to the governing law of the arbitration agreement, the collection of evidence, custody of property, selection of chief arbiter, interlocutory awards, etc. In addition, some non-legal problems must also be resolved, like the actual judicial review of arbitration awards or difficulties of executing arbitration awards.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제55권
• /
• pp.209-240
• /
• 2012

Since the age of Lord Mansfield, who laid the foundation of the modern English insurance contract law in the second part of the 18th century, English insurance law has developed a unique rule of warranty. Lord Mansfield adopted very different approach and afforded such a strict legal character to insurance warranty, because the promise, given by the insured, played an important role for the insurer to assess the scope of the risk insured at that time. It is still important that the insured keep his promises strictly to the insurer under the insurance contract, but legal environments have changed dramatically since the times of Lord Mansfield. English Law Commission proposed some proposals for reforming the warranty regime to reflect the changes of legal environment in CP 2007. This article is, therefore, designed to examine the proposals and consider their legal and practical implications. The proposals of Law Commission is summarized as following. First, in CP 2007, Law Commission made two principal proposals for reform of the law on warranty. The first is that the insurer should not be entitled to rely on a breach of warranty unless the insured has been provided with a witten statement of what they have undertaken under warranty. The second is that the insurer should not be entitled to reject a claim on the ground that the insured has breached a warranty unless there was a causal connection between the breach and the loss. Secondly, for consumer insurance, the rule requiring a causal connection would be mandatory, whereas for business insurance, it would be possible for the parties to agree on the effect a breach of warranty should have, provided they use clear language to express their intentions. Thirdly, where the insured contracted on the insurer's written standard terms of business, some statutory controls would be afforded to the contract to ensure that the cover was not substantially different from what the insured reasonably expected. Finally, Law Commission propose that a breach of warranty give the insurer the right to terminate the contract, rather than automatically discharging it from liability, but (unless otherwise agreed) only if the breach has sufficiently serious consequences to justify termination under the general law of contract. Having evaluated the proposals of the Law Commission and considered their legal and practical implications, it is quite clear that the proposed rule interfere with freedom of contract and create legal uncertainty. But change can not made without any victims, so Law Commission's attempt to change severe and injust aspects of the warranty regime would be very welcomed and respected.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제69권
• /
• pp.127-151
• /
• 2016

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts(PICC) was published in 1994. PICC has been functioned as a guideline of international commercial contracts, an applicable law to govern a contract by the agreement of the parties to a contract, general principles of law and lex mercatoria. In addition, PICC has a role of interpreting or supplementing international uniform law instruments as well as domestic laws, and also has served as a model for national and international legislations. PICC has been accepted as a authoritative source of knowledge of international trade usages of international commercial contracts to the arbitral tribunal rather than domestic court because it excluded the characteristics of hard law at the drafting stage. This article dealt with the rule on gross disparity of validity which fall outside the scope of UN Convention on Contract for the International Sale of Goods(CISG), which has obtained a leading legal position of uniform law in international sales of good. In other words, PICC suggests a series of meaningful solutions to the issue of gross disparity of contract which is the most complicated among legal disputes occurring during the process of conclusion of contact and also extremely different and diverse between legal systems. This article covered the issue of gross disparity of contract at the conclusion of contact and suggested the legal basis of several rules related to the gross disparity by analysing gross disparity rule of PICC. Furthermore, this article suggested legal check points or implication as well as interpretation and evaluation on doctrine of laesio enormis and undue influence or unconscionability. This article also dealt with a comparative analysis with Principles of European Contract Law(PECL) and Common European Sales Law(CESL) which have important legal positions in the area of international commercial contract as well as in terms of close relationship to PICC by linking with recent court or arbitral tribunal rulings.