• 사회복지연구
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.161-187
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 두 가지의 연구관심으로부터 출발한다. 첫째, 가족정책 연구 분야에서 가족법이 등한시되었다는 것인데, 가족법은 가족생활에 대한 국가 개입의 핵심임에도 불구하고 비교연구방법을 사용한 선행연구의 부족으로 많이 다루어지지 못하였다. 둘째, 법학에서의 가족 및 가족정책의 개념 및 접근 방법을 살펴봄으로써 가족정책의 외연이 넓혀질 수 있다는 것이다. 이 둘을 결합하여 본 연구는 법학에서의 부양 공동체라는 분석틀을 도출하여 유형구분의 시각에서 한국과 EU 16개국의 가족법의 주요 내용을 비교하고자 한다. 사용되는 방법론은 주관적 해석을 배제하여 부부관계와 부모자녀관계에서 부양의무와 관련되는 주요 내용을 살펴본 후, 사생활과 자율성이라는 기준을 통해 가족법 체제의 유형구분을 군집분석을 통해 시행하는 것이다. 분석결과를 살펴보면 군집분석 대상 16개국은 북구(노르웨이, 스웨덴) 서북유럽(덴마크, 프랑스, 영국, 핀란드, 벨기에) 그리고 중남유럽(이태리, 스페인, 오스트리아, 포르투갈, 네덜란드, 그리스, 아일랜드, 독일, 한국)등 세 개의 군집으로 분류되었다. OECD 21개국의 가족정책을 대상으로 군집분석을 한 선행연구와 비교하면, 세 개의 군집으로 분류되는 것은 동일하지만 덴마크와 핀란드는 가족정책에 의하면 북구군집에 속하였으나 가족법의 분류에서는 서북유럽 군집으로, 독일, 오스트리아, 네덜란드, 아일랜드 등은 유럽대륙·영연방군집에 속하였으나 중남유럽군집으로 분류되었다는 차이가 있다. 본 연구의 이론적 함의는 가족법에서도 가족정책의 군집분석과 같이 세 개의 군집으로 구분되었다는 점에서 일관성이 있으나, 몇 개의 국가는 가족정책과 가족법에 속하는 유형이 다르다는 점에서 포괄적인 의미의 가족정책이 항상 일관성을 가지는 것은 아님을 알 수 있다.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-24
• /
• 2014

Policy planners in Asia readily covet high technology districts and regional systems of innovation such as Silicon Valley. We examine the law's role, by way of covenants not to compete (競業禁止條項) in the development of Silicon Valley by reviewing the literature from 1999 through 2013. The research suggests that in certain high-tech districts such as Silicon Valley, there are greater gains in the innovation of a region by prohibiting CNCs. While we emphasize CNC law as the main legal determinant to Silicon Valley's success, the application of trade secret law and the inevitable disclosure doctrine are also factors that can aid or restrict the mobility and knowledge spillover of a region. Even with much explored, perspectives are lacking from a regional innovation systems analysis, and more so in the context of Asian nations. To tackle these gaps, three analytical frameworks are presented that entails labor law, law and economics, and law and innovation. And from within the law and innovation framework, research is introduced in the hope that future discussions on Asian regional innovation systems consider the legal foundation of Silicon Valley.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.85-98
• /
• 2000

PL law seeks consumers'just compensation and effective deterrence through shirting liability principle from negligence to strict liability. Impact analysis of Product Liability(PL) Low requires consumers' perspectives. This paper performed a policy delphi to predict the impact of PL law on consumers. The study surveyed the opinions of 30 specialists in PL area, ranging from government, officials, professors, researchers, consumer activists, to business executives, for three times. The consumer are as follows: first of all, PL law can contribute to damage compensation significantly in that it stimulates consumer complaints through non- court procedures. It is very unlikely that suits will be increased rapidly due to PL because of the current law environment. The degree of influence of PL law on damage compensation will very according to the content of PL law. Secondly, PL law can contribute to deterrence in that it encourages companies' efforts for product safety while it doesn't undermine consumers' attentions to safety. The influence on companies' efforts will vary according to the content of PL law.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.13-25
• /
• 1993

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) serves to identify a project's possible effects on the environment early enough sufficiently allowing for them to be taken into account in the decision-making process. The EIA in Germany is an instrument of environmental Policy which considers nature as an integrated system (ecosystem). In the german process of developing environmental policy, the EIA has been one of the instruments which introduced by law rather late. This means that the German Law of EIA has been made in 1900, 20 years after the beginning of the environmental policy in Germany. In the following paper I intend to ${\cdot}$ explain the basic concept of the EIA in Germany ${\cdot}$ describe the process of law building for EIA ${\cdot}$ give a short overview of applications and experiences with EIA ${\cdot}$ show the links between EIA and general environmental policy in Germany.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.237-271
• /
• 2013

There is the limit of the traditional legal hermeneutics and fragmentary or individual theoretical legal approach to suggest the desirable solution of Korean health care law system to have many issues. Law & politics research is the legal research method to suggest the resonable understanding and seeking the measures through various approach, decide and evaluate that the legal methods can be functioned as the optimum system design. Law & politics research has some procedure. 1. It is demanded to catalog the comparison target of legal system by its topic. 2. It is demanded to compare it with Korean situation. 3. The realistic and empirical legal research to the compared policy alternatives is needed. 4. Reflecting the results of this research work, the desirable policy idea must be adopted. 5. The accomplishment of this policy idea must be come true as a specific legislation through interest coordination. 6. This plan must be come into force and the feedback to effect of society must be examined closely. Here I will review generally the contribution of law & politics research to health care law system because of the problem of time and the insufficiency of law & politics research. The constitutional consideration is important to support the interest coordination because of the shortage of resources. The comparative law research can compare our health care system with those of other countries and seek some desirable alternatives. If we discuss the law system plan in a long time and synthetically from different perspectives, more desirable helath care law system can be deducted.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.327-348
• /
• 1998

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.183-214
• /
• 1998

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.117-181
• /
• 1998

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.473-489
• /
• 1998

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제12권
• /
• pp.303-320
• /
• 2000