• 제목/요약/키워드: Language as Sign

검색결과 144건 처리시간 0.024초

인도네시아 현대미술에 있어서의 설치미술 - 미디엄과 사회적 공간을 위한 탐색 (Installation Art In Indonesian Contemporary Art; A Quest For Medium and Social Spaces)

  • A. 릭릭 쿠스마라
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제5호
    • /
    • pp.217-229
    • /
    • 2007
  • Many historical research and facet about modern art in Indonesia which formulating background of contemporary Indonesian Art. Indonesian art critic Sanento Yuliman states that Modern art has been rapidly developing in Indonesia since the Indonesian Independence in 1945. Modern Art is a part of the super culture of the Indonesian metropolitan and is closely related to the contact between the Indonesian and Western Cultures. Its birth was part of the nationalism project, when the Indonesian people consists of various ethnics were determined to become a new nation, the Indonesian nation, and they wished for a new culture, and therefore, a new art. The period 1960s, which was the beginning of the creation and development of the painters and the painters associations, was the first stage of the development of modern art in Indonesia. The second stage showed the important role of the higher education institutes for art. These institutes have developed since the 1950s and in the 1970s they were the main education institutes for painters and other artists. The artists awareness of the medium, forms or the organization of shapes were encouraged more intensely and these encouraged the exploring and experimental attitudes. Meanwhile, the information about the world's modern art, particularly Western Art; was widely and rapidly spread. The 1960s and 1970s were marked by the development of various abstractions and abstract art and the great number of explorations in various new media, like the experiment with collage, assemblage, mixed media. The works of the Neo Art Movement-group in the second half of the 1970s and in the 1980s shows environmental art and installations, influenced by the elements of popular art, from the commercial world and mass media, as well as the involvement of art in the social and environmental affairs. The issues about the environment, frequently launched by the intellectuals in the period of economic development starting in the 1970s, echoed among the artists, and they were widened in the social, art and cultural circles. The Indonesian economic development following the important change in the 1970s has caused a change in the life of the middle and upper class society, as has the change in various aspects of a big city, particularly Jakarta. The new genre emerged in 1975 which indicates contemporary art in Indonesia, when a group of young artists organized a movement, which was widely known as the Indonesian New Art Movement. This movement criticized international style, universalism and the long standing debate on an east-west-dichotomy. As far as the actual practice of the arts was concerned the movement criticized the domination of the art of painting and saw this as a sign of stagnation in Indonesian art development. Based on this criticism 'the movement' introduced ready-mades and installations (Jim Supangkat). Takes almost two decades that the New Art Movement activists were establishing Indonesian Installation art genre as contemporary paradigm and influenced the 1980's gene ration like, FX Harsono, Dadang Christanto, Arahmaiani, Tisna Sanjaya, Diyanto, Andarmanik, entering the 1990's decade as "rebellion period" ; reject towards established aesthetic mainstream i.e. painting, sculpture, graphic art which are insufficient to express "new language" and artistic needs especially to mediate social politic and cultural situation. Installation Art which contains open possibilities of creation become a vehicle for aesthetic establishment rejection and social politics stagnant expression in 1990s. Installation art accommodates two major field; first, the rejection of aesthetic establishment has a consequences an artists quest for medium; deconstruction models and cross disciplines into multi and intermedia i.e. performance, music, video etc. Second aspect is artists' social politic intention for changes, both conclude as characteristics of Indonesian Installation Art and establishing the freedom of expression in contemporary Indonesian Art until today.

  • PDF

라우센버그와 게임하기-<리버스> 다시읽기 (Playing with Rauschenberg: Re-reading Rebus)

  • 이지은
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제2호
    • /
    • pp.27-48
    • /
    • 2004
  • Robert Rauschenberg's artistic career has often been regarded as having reached its culmination when the artist won the first prize at the 1964 Venice Biennale. With this victory, Rauschenberg triumphantly entered the pantheon of all-American artists and firmly secured his position in the history of American art. On the other hand, despite the artist's ongoing new experiments in his art, the seemingly precocious ripeness in his career has led the critical discourses on Rauschenberg's art to the artist's early works, most of which were done in the mid-1950s and the 1960s. The crux of Rauschenberg criticism lies not only in focusing on the artist's 50's and 60's works, but also in its large dismissal of the significance of the imagery that the artist employed in his works. As art historians Roger Cranshaw and Adrian Lewis point out, the critical discourse of Rauschenberg either focuses on the formalist concerns on the picture plane, or relies on the "culturalist" interpretation of Rauschenberg's imagery which emphasizes the artist's "Americanness." Recently, a group of art historians centered around October has applied Charles Sanders Peirce's semiotics as art historical methodology and illuminated the indexical aspects of Rauschenberg's work. The semantic inquiry into Rauschenberg's imagery has also been launched by some art historians who seek the clues in the artist's personal context. The first half of this essay will examine the previous criticism on Rauschenberg's art and the other half will discuss the artist's 1955 work Rebus, which I think intersects various critical concerns of Rauschenberg's work, and yet defies the closure of discourses in one direction. The categories of signs in the semiotics of Charles Sanders Peirce and the discourse of Jean-Francois Lyotard will be used in discussing the meanings of Rebus, not to search for the semantic readings of the work, hut to make an analogy in terms of the paradoxical structures of both the work and the theory. The definitions of rebus is as follows: Rebus 1. a representation or words or syllables by pictures of object or by symbols whose names resemble the intended words or syllables in sound; also: a riddle made up wholly or in part of such pictures or symbols. 2. a badge that suggests the name of the person to whom it belongs. Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged. Since its creation in 1955, Robert Rauschenberg's Rebus has been one of the most intriguing works in the artist's oeuvre. This monumental 'combine' painting($6feet{\times}10feet$ 10.5 inches) consists of three panels covered with fabric, paper, newspaper, and printed reproductions. On top of these, oil paints, pencil and crayon drawings connect each section into a whole. The layout of the images is overall horizontal. Starting from a torn election poster, which is partially read as "THAT REPRE," on the far left side of the painting. Rebus leads us to proceed from the left to the right, the typical direction of reading in a Western context. Along with its seemingly proper title. Rebus, the painting has triggered many art historians to seek some semantic readings of it. These art historians painstakingly reconstruct the iconography based on the artist's interviews, (auto)biography, and artistic context of his works. The interpretation of Rebus varies from a 'image-by-image' collation with a word to a more general commentary on Rauschenberg's work overall, such as a work that "bridges between art and life." Despite the title's allusion to the legitimate purpose of the painting as a decoding of the imagery into sound, Rebus, I argue, actually hinders a reading of it. By reading through Peirce to Rauschenberg, I will delve into the subtle anxiety between words and images in their works. And on this basis, I suggest Rauschenberg's strategy in playing Rebus is to hide the meaning of the imagery rather than to disclose it.

  • PDF

한의 진단의 추론형식과 실재성 (Inferential Structure and Reality Problem in Diagnosis of Oriental Medicine)

  • 박경모;최승훈;안규석
    • 제3의학
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.55-84
    • /
    • 1997
  • Inferential structure and reality problem is a serious issue to O.M.(oriental medicine). The study will analyze this issue through a philosophical and historical comparative study of W.M.M(Western modern medicine) and O.M. First, I presuppose some basic ideas. The first is the division of the 'the philosophy of medicine' and 'the medicine itself'. Second, there is a 'visibility' that discriminate between 'the abstractive concept' and 'the concrete object' in diagnostic terminology. The third is the separation of disease, the entity and disease, the phenomenon. Finally, the distinction between the cause of disease and the nature of disease. Through these basic concepts, this study will analyze O.M's diagnostic methodology, 'Pattern identification of the S.A.S(sign and symptom)'. The results are follows: 1. O.M's views disease as a phenomenon. So, the S.A.S, which is visible, is the disease itself. Tough the analysis and inference of the S.A.S, 證(zheng) the essence is derived. 2. 證(zheng) can be considered as 'the abstractive concept' reflecting the essence of a disease. 3. 證(zheng) is not arrived through causal sequence reasoning but rather by analogical reasoning. 4. 證(zheng) is 'the non-random correlative combination of S.A.S', pattern. These patterns secure the abstractive deduction in reality. that is, The causality, the positivism, the view of disease as entity, and anatomical knowledge are the traits peculiar to W.M.M. But, these properties can not be applied universally to every medical systems. Also, these properties do not indicate the superiority or inferiority of any medical system. 5. 證(zheng) summarizes the patients condition simultaneously with the S.A.S. However, 證(zheng) doesn't necessarily indicate the knowledge about the actual internal organ. That is, Early in O.M.'s history, the diagnostic terminologies including 證(zheng) were analogical reflections of a naive knowledge of internal organs and external environmental factors. Later, the naive knowledge in 證(zheng) changed int new nature, an abstractive concept. The confusion of the concept of disease, the indiscriminate acceptance of Western anatomical knowledge, and the O.M.'s theoretical evolution et are the challenge facing modern O.M. To find solutions, this study looks at the sequence of the birth of W.M.M. and then compares it's system with the O.M. system. The confusion of the concept of disease, the indiscriminate acceptance of Western anatomical knowledge, and the O.M.'s theoretical evolution et are the challenge facing modern O.M. To find solutions, this study looks at the sequence of the birth of W.M.M. and then compares it's system with the O.M. system. It is recommended that O.M. diagnostics should pay close attention to the ambiguity of the diagnostic methodology in order to further development. At present time, the concept and the system peculiar to O.M. can not be explained by common language. but O.M.'s practitioner can not persist in this manner an: longer. Along with the internal development of O.M., the adjustment of O.M.'s diagnostic terminology needs to be adopted.

  • PDF

소아청소년 정신과병동 입원아동의 학대에 대한 임상 연구 (CLINICAL STUDY OF THE ABUSE IN PSYCHIATRICALLY HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS)

  • 이수경;홍강의
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • /
    • 제10권2호
    • /
    • pp.145-157
    • /
    • 1999
  • 이 논문은 소아청소년 정신병동에 입원한 아동에서 신체적, 정서적 학대와 방임이 동반된 아동을 선별하여 이루어졌다. 입원 아동중 이에 해당하는 아동이 얼마나 되는지 살펴보았으며 학대가 아동의 정서행동에 미치는 영향이 다양하고 가족의 특성과 발달과정에 따른 영향이 서로 상호 작용할 것으로 생각되어 특징적 증상과 발달력, 학대의 특성, 학대자의 특성, 가족역동, 정신병리의 임상적 특징을 알아보았다. 1995년 9월부터 1997년 8월까지 서울대학교 병원 소아청소년 정신과 병동에 입원한 아동 중 주치의의 면담과 병록지를 참조하여 학대와 방임이 뚜렷하다고 판단된 아동, 22명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 1) 아동의 인구학적 특징:성별은 남아가 1:6.3의 비율로 압도적으로 많았고 평균연령은 $11.1{\pm}2.5$세였다. 형제순서는 첫째가 12명(54.5%), 둘째 5명(23%), 셋째는 2명(9%)이었고 독자는 3명(13.5%)이었다. 2) 가족의 특징:사회경제적 상태는 중상 3명(13.5%), 중 9명(41%), 중하 9명(41%), 하 1명(0.5%)이었다. 가족 수는 3인 이하 3명(13.5%), 4∼5인이 17명(77.5%), 6∼7인 2명(9%)이었다. 부가 직업이 있는 경우는 18명(81.8%)이었고 모가 직업이 있는 것은 7명(32%)이었다. 결혼상태는 이혼과 별거가 5명(23.0%), 재혼 2명(9%)이었고 심각한 부부불협화는 19명(86.5%)에서 보였다. 부에서 반사회적 행동은 7명(32%), 알콜 중독은 10명(45.5%)이었다. 모의 알콜남용이 5명(23%)이었고 우울은 17명(77.3%)에서 보였으며 정신과 진료력이 6명(27%)에서 있었다. 3) 학대의 특징:신체적 학대가 18명(81.8%), 신체적 방임과 정서적 방임은 4명(18.2%)이었다. 학대 시작시기는 3세 이전이 15명(54.5%) 3세 이후가 5명(27.5%), 학령기가 1명(5%)이었다. 학대가 부에 의해서만 일어나는 경우는 2명(9%)이었고 모에 의해서만 일어나는 경우는 8명(35.4%)이었으며 부모에 의해 동시에 일어나는 경우는 8명(35.4%)이었다. 배우자 구타가 동반된 것은 7례(27%)에서 였고 배우자 학대의 피해자는 자녀에 대해 신체적 학대나 정서적 학대를 가하고 있었다. 형제자매가 같이 학대를 받고 있는 것은 4명(18.2%)이었다. 4) 학대아동의 일반적 특징 및 발달력:원하던 아이로 태어난 것은 10명(45.5%)이었고 원하지 않는 아이로 태어난 아동이 12명(54.5%)이었다. 학대이전에 언어나 운동발달상의 이상을 보인 아동은 9명(41%)이었으며 공존하는 발달장애가 있는 아동은 모두 15명이었는데 이들 중 학대이전에 뚜렷한 발달지체의 증거가 없었던 경우는 6명(27.5%)이었다. 또 학대이전 과잉운동을 보인 아동은 9명(41%), 키우기 어렵게 지각한 아동이(difficult child) 6명(27.5%)이었다. 뇌파의 이상소견은 5명(23%), 두뇌의 컴퓨터단층촬영이나 핵자기 공명술 이상소견은 4명(18.2%), 벤더-게스탈트검사에서 기질성 뇌장애를 의심할만한 소견은 14명(63.5%)에서 보였다. 지능검사의 결과는 평균이상 IQ는 12명((54.5%), 지능지체 및 경계선 지능은 9명(41.0%)이었다. 5) 주 진단 및 공존진단:주 진단으로는 행실장애가 6명(27.3%), 경계선장애(borderline child) 5명(23.0%), 우울병 4명(18%), 주의력결핍-과잉운동장애 4명(18%), 달리 분류되지 않는 전반적 발달장애 2명(9%), 선택적 함구증 1명(5%)이었다. 모든 대상 아동이 주 진단 이외의 2∼6개 이상의 다양한 공존진단을 보였다. 공존진단에는 주의력결핍-과잉운동장애, 우울병, 경계선지능 및 정신지체, 학습장애, 언어발달장애, 적대적 반항장애, 만성 틱장애, 기능성 유뇨증과 유분증, 달리 분류되지 않는 불안장애, 해리 장애, 기질성 성격장애순이었다. 6) 치료경과:이들 아동의 입원기간은 평균 2.4개월(${\pm}1.5$)이었고. 이들 중 권유에 의한 퇴원은 14명(63.5%), 조기거역퇴원은 6명(27.3%)이었고 증상의 호전을 보인 것은 모두 11명(50%)이었고 변함이 없는 경우도 11명(50%)였다.

  • PDF