• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2001년도 토목섬유기술위원회 학술세미나 논문집
• /
• pp.45-54
• /
• 2001

In this study, slope stability analysis of LCRS(Leachate Collection Removel System) in waste landfill was peformed by large scale field test. Geocomat is new type of geocomposite product. Gecomat is a sort of Geocomposite product. It is composed of nonwoven geotextiles, woven geotextile, and geonet. Large scale field tests were performed on the slope of different two LCRSsections with static loading condition. One is LCRS section witch consist of GCL, HDPE and Geocomat, another is GCL, HDPE, and woven type geocomposite. The behavior of geosynthetics lined slope was monitored by incorporating instrumentation including vertical soil pressure meter, settlement plate, strain gauges, potential meter, displacement pin.. Based on the field monitoring, the Geocomat LCRS section is less sliding than the conventional geocomposite LCRS section.

• 스마트미디어저널
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 2016

사물인터넷 기술을 이용한 서비스 형태는 셀 수 없이 많으며, 현재도 여러 기관에서 다양한 서비스를 제공하기 위해 새로운 기술이나 프로토콜을 만들어 내고 있다. 본 논문은 사물인터넷 서비스 접근제어를 위한 시스템에서 효율적인 서비스 제공을 위한 리소스 서비스 모델을 설계하고 구현한다. 사용자가 접근하고자 하는 리소스 서비스를 LCRS(Left Child-Right Sibling) 트리를 이용하여 모델링하고, 리소스 서비스 토큰을 이용하여 서비스에 대한 접근 제어를 수행할 수 있다.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.181-192
• /
• 2017

사물인터넷은 다양한 사물들로부터 발생되는 정보를 수집 공유 분석하여 사람들에게 유용한 정보 서비스를 제공하는 것을 의미한다. 본 논문은 사물인터넷 환경에서 발생하는 서비스 접근제어, 서비스 보안 기술 그리고 ID 관리 기술에 대한 서비스 영역에서의 보안 안전성을 향상시키는 방안을 제시한다. 서비스 보안의 안전성 향상을 위해 공개키 기반의 C&C(Certificate and Capability) 서비스 토큰 인증서를 설계하고 발급할 수 있는 서비스를 구현하였다. 또한 노드 디바이스로부터 수집된 데이터를 기반으로 리소스 서비스의 생성 시 이를 효율적으로 관리하고자 LCRS(Left Child-Right Sibling) 리소스 모델관리 방안과 서비스에 대한 접근제어를 위해 리소스 서비스 URI 보안 관리하는 IoT 서비스 시스템을 구현하였다.

• Journal of Genetic Medicine
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.110-116
• /
• 2021

Microdeletions of chromosome 22q11.2 are one of the most common microdeletions occurring in humans, and is known to be associated with a wide range of highly variable features. These deletions occur within a cluster of low copy repeats (LCRs) in 22q11.2, referred to as LCR22 A-H. DiGeorge (DGS)/velocardiofacial syndrome is the most prevalent form of a 22q11.2 deletions, caused by mainly proximal deletions between LCR22 A and D. As deletions of distal portion to the DGS deleted regions has been extensively studied, the recurrent distal 22q11.2 microdeletions distinct from DGS has been suggested as several clinical entities according to the various in size and position of the deletions on LCRs. We report a case of long-term follow-up of a female diagnosed with a 22q11.2 distal deletion syndrome, identified a deletion of 1.9 Mb at 22q11.21q11.23 (chr22: 21,798,906-23,653,963) using single nucleotide polymorphism array. This region was categorized as distal deletion type of 22q11.2, involving LCR22 D-F. She was born as a preterm, low birth weight to healthy non-consanguineous Korean parents. She showed developmental delay, growth retardation, dysmorphic facial features, and mild skeletal deformities. The patient underwent a growth hormone administration due to growth impairment without catch-up growth. While a height gain was noted, she had become overweight and was subsequently diagnosed with pre-diabetes. Our case could help broaden the genetic and clinical spectrum of 22q11.2 distal deletions.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제77권5호
• /
• pp.661-672
• /
• 2021

In this article, the role of spans number and length in fire-resistance ratings (FRRs) of fireproofed steel frames are investigated. First, over a span-lengthening scenario, two one- and three-bay frames under the ISO834 fire are examined. It is shown that the FRRs of the frames rely highly on the changes made on their span length. Second, a building designed for three spans number of three, four, and five under natural fire is investigated. The beams are designed for two load-capacity-ratios (LCRs) of optimum and ultimate. The fire curves are determined through a probabilistic-based approach. It is shown that the structural vulnerability vastly increases while the number of spans decreases. The results show that for an optimum LCR, while the five-span frame can meet the required FRR in 87% of the fire scenarios, the four- and three-span frames can meet the required FRR in only 56%, and 50% of the fire scenarios, respectively. For an ultimate LCR, the five-, four- and three-span frames can meet the required FRR in 81%, 50%, and 37.5% of the fire scenarios, respectively. Functional solutions are then proposed to resolve the insufficiencies in the results and to rectify the application of the standard-based FRRs in the cases studied. The study here highlights how employing current standard-based FRRs can endanger structural safety if they are not connected to structural characteristics; a crucial hint specifically for the structural engineering community who may be not well familiar with the fundamentals of performance-based approaches.