• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.127-145
• /
• 2008

We have known that "Chimgudaeseong(鍼灸大成)" had been written by Yanggyeju(楊繼洲) in Myeong(明) Dynasty. And it had been the only text book of acupuncture & moxibustion for 300 years. This book is composed of 10 chapters dealing almost all the medical theories of that times. This book is so enormous that it is hard to understand essential ideas of author. The reading medical records is one of the best way to develop one's abilities of curing a disease without clinical practice. so we can't help dealing with medical records, because it is one of important method of understanding Oriental Medicine. On this study, we investigate a objective method on understanding medical records in "Chimgudaeseong(鍼灸大成)".

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.21-30
• /
• 2020

'Medical officials of State Council' (議政府藥房) (MOSC) were bureaucrats who was part of a State Council and provided regular medical care to the State Council's bureaucracy. The Manual for Medical Officials of State Council (議政府藥房式例) (MMOSC) is a rare resource that records the actual work of the MOSC in the 19th century. This paper examines the changing history of the title of 'medical official' (藥房, yakbang) in the Joseon Dynasty and analyzes the role of MOSC by examining the contents of MMOSC. It argues: 1) The MOSC system was established before other similar medical office systems. Subsequently, the Medical Office of Ritual Minister (禮曹藥房) and Medical Office of Patriots and Veterans Minister (忠勳府藥房) were established, followed by Medical Office of General Office (都總府藥房) and Medical Office of Managing Royal Family (宗親府藥房). 2) The MMOSC was first written in 1812 and was augmented in 1832 and 1840. This timeline can be verified through written seal at the end of the literature. 3) In addition to the medicine-related work, the medical office also did the administrative work of the government office.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.3-58
• /
• 2024

It has become a general idea today that the characteristics of medicine should be considered as a basis when discussing a medical personnel's duty of care and whether or not it has been violated, and when discussing its duty of explanation and whether or not it has been fulfilled in medical practice. However, in the discussion of its characteristics, some shortcomings still exist, so the need for a re-discussion has been raised. Firstly, existing discussions on characteristics have failed to comprehensively grasp and explain the characteristics of medical practice. Secondly, in some researchers' arguments, there are discrepancies between the terms used to express characteristics and their conceptual definitions or content. Thirdly, the lack of exemplified cases that reflect the characteristics of medicine - especially Supreme Court precedents - has led some to think negatively about the recognition and reflection of certain characteristics. In my early writings, I have described five characteristics of medical practice: 'conflict in medical goals', 'initiating appropriate medical actions (progression of illness)', 'dynamics of medical intervention (diversity of symptoms)', 'diversity of medical effects', 'inherent risk of medical treatment (invasiveness)'. In this paper, keeping in mind the reasons for the need for reconsideration, I aim to analyze the characteristics of medicine in detail and cite key parts of representative Korean Supreme Court precedents that reflect each characteristic. The characteristics of medicine extracted from this paper are; There are ten factors, including the legitimacy of the essence of medical practice, timeliness of medical execution, dynamics of medical progress, diversity of medical effects, risk of medical invasion, non-uniformity of medical methods, limitations of medical capabilities, intervention of the medical subject, high degree of medical standards, and maldistribution of medical data.

• 한국수정란이식학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수정란이식학회 2003년도 제3회 발생공학 국제심포지움 및 학술대회
• /
• pp.105-105
• /
• 2003

• 한국수정란이식학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수정란이식학회 2003년도 제3회 발생공학 국제심포지움 및 학술대회
• /
• pp.106-106
• /
• 2003

• 한국임상수의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국임상수의학회 2006년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.110-110
• /
• 2006

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2022

한국의 의료기기 산업은 1995년부터 시작된 G7 의료공학기술개발사업으로 본격적인 성장과 발전의 기틀을 마련하였으며 2020년 한국 의료기기 생산실적은 2001년에 비하여 8.52배, 수출 실적은 13.94배 성장하였다. 의료기기 국산화 개발 초기에 초음파 의료기기 등 전자 의료기기의 개발이 활발하였던 것과 비교하여 2020년에는 체외진단시약과 치과용 임플랜트의 생산 및 수출 실적이 상위권을 차지하고 있다. 그러나 한국 의료기기 시장에서 수입 의료기기가 차지하는 비중은 60-70%에서 큰 변화가 없는데 이는 한국의 의료기기 산업이 중저가 의료기기를 생산 수출하고, 기술집약적이고 자본집약적인 고가 의료기기는 주로 수입에 의존하고 있기 때문이다. 본 논문에서는 한국과 세계시장의 주요 의료기기 회사들의 생산 품목을 비교하여 한국 의료기기 산업의 세계 시장 진출에 대한 전략을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.111-122
• /
• 2013

Korean medical journals were continuously published during the period of Japanese colonization of Korea. Various advertisements by herbal drugs manufacturers were in these journals, targeting Korean medical doctors or students who aspired to be Korean medical doctors. The advertisements varied from small ones to large-scale ads. At first these advertisements covered only dried herbs, but with time, they came to advertise various kinds of drugs. Advertisement of merchandise drugs brought many changes to the medical culture of Korea. Korean medical doctors who only prescribed dried herbs before began to prescribe merchandise drugs as well. When treating patients, they not only used Korean drugs but also actively prescribed merchandise drugs and western drugs, showing an advancement in treatment. As Korean medical doctors played the role of providers of merchandise drugs, herbal drugs manufacturers and Korean medical doctors seemed as sellers and consumers on the surface. However, they maintained a relationship where Korean medicine worked as the common denominator. Among merchandise drugs, Yoeng-so-hwan, Bi-jeon-go, and Myeol-dok-hwan were advertised often, and this shows that people at the time suffered mostly from digestive diseases, skin diseases, and sexually transmitted diseases. Herbal drugs manufacturers were business managers whose main objective was to make a good profit, but they consisted a part of Korean medical society. Like Korean medical doctors, they were anxious about the fall of Korean medicine. As a part of popularization of Korean medicine, they encouraged Korean medical doctors to treat patients using herbal drugs and merchandise drugs. This thought was reflected well in advertisements and Korean medical doctors made use of this thought well.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2020

Following the opening of eleven medical schools in Korea in the 1980s, the issues of standardization and accreditation of medical education came to the forefront in the early 1990s. To address the medical community's concern about the quality of medical education, the Korean Council for University Education and Ministry of Education conducted a compulsory medical school evaluation in 1996 to see whether the medical schools were meeting accreditation standards or not. The evaluation was a "relative evaluation" rather than an "absolute evaluation." The Accreditation Board for Medical Education in Korea (ABMEK), established in 1998, was a mere voluntary organization, but with the full support of the Korean medical community, it successfully completed its first cycle of evaluations on all 41 medical schools from 2000-2004. The history of medical education evaluation activities, including those of ABMEK, was not well recorded. In 2004, ABMEK changed its name to the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) as a corporate body and the government paid much attention to its voluntary accreditation activities. In 2014, the Ministry of Education officially recognized the KIMEE as an Institute for Accreditation of Higher Education Evaluation. The most important lesson learned from the history of ABMEK/KIMEE is the importance of cooperation among all medical education-related organizations, including the Korean Medical Association.

• 대한임상검사과학회지
• /
• 제56권1호
• /
• pp.21-31
• /
• 2024

본 연구의 목적은 의료기사를 의료인 종별에 포함시키는 것에 대한 기초 자료를 제시하는 것이다. 의료법에서 의료인을 의사, 치과의사, 한의사, 조산사, 간호사로 정의한다. 의료기사는 임상병리사, 방사선사, 물리치료사, 작업치료사, 치과기공사, 치과위생사로 구분한다. 한국은 의료인에 의료기사를 포함하지 않지만 일본과 대만은 의료인으로 규정하고 있다. 국제표준직업분류(ISCO-08), 한국표준직업분류(KSCO-2017), 일본표준직업분류(JSOC-2009), 대만표준직업분류(TSOC-2010), 미국표준직업분류(SOC-2018) 등의 다양한 표준직업분류를 비교하였다. 의료기사 교육체계는 4년제 대학과 3년제 전문대학 프로그램을 포함하는 것으로 설명하였다. 의료행위, 치료, 진료보조 분야에서 의료기사의 역할을 개략적으로 설명했다. 이러한 기초자료는 의료기사의 의료인 종별 포함의 의미에 대한 논의의 필요성과 의료인 종별 포함과 관련하여 의료기사의 전문성의 합법화에 기여할 것이다.