• 제목/요약/키워드: Korean University Accreditation Institute

검색결과 134건 처리시간 0.029초

의료기관인증의 효과에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰: Balanced Score Card 관점으로 (Impact of Healthcare Accreditation Using a Systematic Review: Balanced Score Card Perspective)

  • 박일태;정연이;박성희;황정해;석승한
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.69-90
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of healthcare accreditation and to provide empirical evidence to validate positive effectiveness. Methods:Six electronic databases (KERIS, KoreaMed, NDSL, Ovid-medline, Embase, Cochrane library) were accessed in May 2016. Keywords used were 'accreditation' and 'Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO)'. Of the initially identified 3,008 articles, 60 studies on healthcare accreditation were selected based on inclusion criteria that are hospital accreditation, accreditation by disease and clinical center accreditation. These were retrieved and analyzed. Result: The 60 study results were on the impact of healthcare accreditation. Results were classified into four perspectives of Balanced Score Card (Financial, Customer, Internal Process, Learning & Growth). In internal process perspective, results revealed that healthcare accreditation has made a positive impact on "care process and procedure". In learning & growth perspective, healthcare accreditation has made a positive influence on "leadership", "organizational cultures" and "change mechanisms". However, it revealed that healthcare accreditation does not directly affect financial performance. It is also difficult to reach a definitive conclusion that healthcare accreditation programs affect patient satisfaction of customer and clinical outcome of the internal process. Conclusion: Healthcare accreditation programs provide positive impact on change of care process and building communication-oriented hospital culture. However, more rigorous and diverse research is needed on financial effects and clinical outcomes of healthcare accreditation.

한국 치위생학 교육 평가인증제도의 필요성 (The necessity for the Korean Dental Hygiene Education Accreditation System)

  • 김지연;김영숙;정순희;신제원
    • 한국치위생학회지
    • /
    • 제14권6호
    • /
    • pp.789-794
    • /
    • 2014
  • The increasing cross-border mobility of dental school or dental hygiene students, educators, practitioners, programs and providers takes challenges for existing national quality assurance and accreditation frameworks and bodies, as well as for the systems for recognizing foreign qualifications. The new dental hygiene accreditation system was introduced to encourage the improvement of dental hygiene programs, to ensure the quality of education and, most of all, to establish an internationally compatible system of evaluation and accreditation. The accreditation procedure takes 1 year to complete. The result of the accreditation is released after evaluation via self-study report, site visit, preliminary draft report, responses from the institution and the results from the conciliation and review committees. The result from the accreditation procedure is either 'accreditation' or 'no accreditation'. Accredited schools receive one of several statuses following the evaluation. These are next general review, interim report and interim visit or suspension. Dental healthcare quality is not improved instantaneously, but instead gradually through continuous communication within the dental field. For this accreditation system to be successful, the following are essential: the accreditation agency should adopt hygiene education accreditation; it needs to become financially independent and managed efficiently; the autonomy and regulations surrounding the system need to be balanced; the professionalism of the system is ensured; and the dental field which includes not only dental program, but also hygiene program, needs to play an active role in the operation of the system.

미국 고등학습위원회 기관평가인증제 평가모형 개혁의 시사점에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Implication from Reform of HLC Institutional Accreditation Model)

  • 이영학
    • 비교교육연구
    • /
    • 제24권3호
    • /
    • pp.245-265
    • /
    • 2014
  • 본 연구는 미국 북중미학교기관협의회 산하 고등학습위원회의 기관평가인증제 평가모형 개혁에 따른 시사점 분석을 통해 한국의 제2주기 기관평가인증제 평가모형 수립에 대해 제언하는 것을 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위해 기관평가인증제 평가모형의 주요 요소인 인증모형, 인증 주기 및 종합평가, 평가준거, 결과판정, 인증지원시스템을 중심으로 고등학습위원회 및 한국대학평가원의 기관평가인증제를 비교 분석하였으며, 분석 결과를 바탕으로 한국의 제2주기 기관평가인증제 시행과 관련하여 다음과 같이 제언하였다. 첫째, 대학의 특성과 질 수준 차이를 반영한 다양한 인증모형을 개발하여 적용할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 최소 수준 질 인증과 함께 기관의 지속적인 질 제고를 유도하는 평가가 필요하다. 셋째, 대학 사명에 근거한 평가를 강화하고 정량적 평가를 최소화하며 평가위원 풀을 확대하고 교육훈련을 강화해야 한다. 넷째, 질 제고 강화를 위해 중간평가를 엄격하게 시행할 필요가 있다. 다섯째, 정부는 기관평가인증제 결과를 대학구조조정 등에 적극적으로 반영해야 한다. 여섯째, 기관평가인증제를 관리하는 시스템 구축 및 대학정보공시제와 연동이 필요하다.

Current Status of Management on Pharmacopuncture in Korea through Introduction of an Accreditation System

  • Sung, Soo-Hyun;Shin, Byung-Cheul;Park, Min-Jung;Kim, Kyeong Han;Kim, Ji-Won;Ryu, Ji-Yeon;Park, Jang-Kyung
    • 대한약침학회지
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.75-82
    • /
    • 2019
  • Objectives: Pharmacopuncture is a new form of acupuncture treatment that injects herbal medicine into acupuncture points. This paper introduces the management status of pharmacopuncture through accreditation, and examines the effect of accreditation on pharmacopuncture management. Methods: The Accreditation System of External Herbal Dispensaries (EHDs) of traditional Korean medicine clinics announced by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in September 2018 were investigated. Results: The Accreditation System of EHDs assesses and certifies herbal medicine and pharmacopuncture preparations. Regular components for the 'pharmacopuncture' certification consist of nine standards, 30 categories, and 165 items. The nine standards include: herbal dispensary facilities, clean room management, management and organization operation, employee management, document management, continuous quality control, herbal medicine management, management of preparation, and pavement management. Conclusion: Through EHD accreditation and certification system, traditional Korean medicine clinics and EHDs can now manage pharmacopuncture medicine quality and promise safe pharmacopuncture treatment for the people.

의료기관 인증제도의 현황과 과제 (Healthcare Accreditation in Korea: The Current Status and Challenges Ahead)

  • 이상일
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제28권3호
    • /
    • pp.251-256
    • /
    • 2018
  • The origin of hospital accreditation in Korea is the Hospital Standardization Program of the Korea Hospital Association. Current accreditation program implemented by the Korea Institute for Healthcare Accreditation has succeeded in stimulating quality improvement activities of participating hospitals since its launching in 2010. However it has been criticized due to some unintended consequences of accreditation. In order to fully enjoy the benefit of the accreditation program in Korea, national efforts to expand accreditation scheme and coverage, upgrade accreditation standards, insure substantiality of accreditation process, provide consumers with more useful information, and strengthen the professional capacity of accreditation organization will be needed.

한국의학교육 평가인증제도의 역사와 의미: 의학교육 평가인증제 도입 배경 및 초창기 활동을 중심으로 (The History and Implications of the Medical Education Accreditation System in Korea: Implementation and Activities in Early Stages)

  • 맹광호
    • 의학교육논단
    • /
    • 제22권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-8
    • /
    • 2020
  • Following the opening of eleven medical schools in Korea in the 1980s, the issues of standardization and accreditation of medical education came to the forefront in the early 1990s. To address the medical community's concern about the quality of medical education, the Korean Council for University Education and Ministry of Education conducted a compulsory medical school evaluation in 1996 to see whether the medical schools were meeting accreditation standards or not. The evaluation was a "relative evaluation" rather than an "absolute evaluation." The Accreditation Board for Medical Education in Korea (ABMEK), established in 1998, was a mere voluntary organization, but with the full support of the Korean medical community, it successfully completed its first cycle of evaluations on all 41 medical schools from 2000-2004. The history of medical education evaluation activities, including those of ABMEK, was not well recorded. In 2004, ABMEK changed its name to the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) as a corporate body and the government paid much attention to its voluntary accreditation activities. In 2014, the Ministry of Education officially recognized the KIMEE as an Institute for Accreditation of Higher Education Evaluation. The most important lesson learned from the history of ABMEK/KIMEE is the importance of cooperation among all medical education-related organizations, including the Korean Medical Association.

Balanced Scorecard Based Performance Analysis of Accreditation for Engineering Education

  • Ju, Yonghan;Sohn, So Young;Ahn, Jinsook;Choi, Jin Young
    • Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
    • /
    • 제13권1호
    • /
    • pp.67-86
    • /
    • 2014
  • The number of students graduating from accredited programs has been increasing annually since the first students graduated from accredited engineering programs in Korean universities in 2004. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of engineering education accreditation by the Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea (ABEEK). We developed performance evaluation indices based on the balanced scorecard concept and applied the proposed indicators to graduates, faculty, and industry employers to see if there are significant differences between accredited and non-accredited groups. Overall, regardless of survey object, engineering education accreditation was perceived to contribute to the elevation of engineering and science and the level of national growth. However, the differences between accredited and non-accredited groups for some key performance indicators were statistically insignificant. The results of this paper are expected to provide crucial feedback information for the improvement of engineering education accreditation in Korea.

국내 의료기관 인증제 전망 (Korean Healthcare Accreditation Perspectives)

  • 염호기;황인선
    • 한국의료질향상학회지
    • /
    • 제18권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-14
    • /
    • 2012
  • Two years have passed since hospital accreditation was introduced in Korea by the Korean Institute of Healthcare Accreditation (KOIHA), which takes, as its mission, continuously improving healthcare quality and patient safety for the public. KOIHA also has a plan to impose on outcomes in management of patient care. With a view to enhance the practice of accreditation in terms of quality as well as quantity, and to help improve healthcare quality and patient safety in Korea, this paper reviews some issues on healthcare policies which are expected to be adopted in 2013 by the forthcoming government. A few suggestions are added.

  • PDF

SE 프로세스 기반 국방 M&S체계 개발 절차 연구 (A Study on SE Process based Defense M&S System Development Procedures)

  • 이동준;고성현;이상복;노광현;윤주일
    • 시스템엔지니어링학술지
    • /
    • 제19권1호
    • /
    • pp.44-55
    • /
    • 2023
  • The defense M&S system, which has been classified as a weapon system between requirements determination and project implementation, is being developed by applying the weapon system development procedure of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration. The M&S system abstracts and models the real world to suit the intended use and proceeds with the process of developing it as a software-oriented system. Overseas, the conceptual model development stage is staged before entering the design stage after the requirements analysis. In addition, each step includes verification and validation processes. In Korea, while establishing and applying the weapon system development procedure based on the SE process, the M&S system is also applied in the same way as the general weapon system, limiting appropriate development outputs and verification and validation. In this study, the system development procedure of the M&S system is established and presented based on the relevant standards and SE process of developed countries.

학문분야별 평가인증제 운영에 관한 질적 사례 연구: 한의학을 중심으로 (A Qualitative Study on Steering of Education Accreditation: With Case Study on Korean Medicine Education)

  • 서동인;신상우
    • 대한한의학회지
    • /
    • 제40권3호
    • /
    • pp.21-34
    • /
    • 2019
  • Objectives: The purpose of this article is to develop steering of program accreditation system in Korean Medicine Education through meta-evaluation. For this study, the subjects of our research were categorized as the accreditation criteria and system, results and effects, tasks for improvement on Korean Medicine Education. Methods: We conducted Focus Group Interview on 102 full-time professors with experience of participating on accreditation of Korean Medicine Education from 12 college of Korean Medicine Education and we analyzed it by thematic analysis. Results: The accreditation criteria and program evaluation system of Korean Medicine were listed as 'Confusion about the goals of program evaluation', 'High hurdles on accreditation', 'obsession to success cases', 'Small college complaints about applying the same criteria', 'Dilemma of quantitative and qualitative evaluation'. The results and effects of program evaluation in Korean Medicine Education were listed as 'Establishment of base infrastructure for basic medical education', 'Benchmarking and exchanging opinions through evaluation certification', 'Resistance to documents and document-based evaluation', and 'Double-sided of evaluation certification'. As for the tasks for further improvement, the following list is suggested. 'Actively promote evaluation certification', 'Simplification and standardization of forms', 'Requesting for activating about Evaluation committee', 'Need for consulting before regular evaluation'. Conclusion: It is necessary to upgrade the accreditation system and make efforts to improve the issues discovered for better Korean Medicine Education.