• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2002.10a
• /
• pp.326-327
• /
• 2002

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2001.10a
• /
• pp.151-152
• /
• 2001

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1996.10a
• /
• pp.353-354
• /
• 1996

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2000.10a
• /
• pp.175-176
• /
• 2000

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1995.10a
• /
• pp.241-242
• /
• 1995

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.328-328
• /
• 2005

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1995.10a
• /
• pp.183-184
• /
• 1995

• Korea Journal of Hospital Management
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.121-148
• /
• 2003

This study is designed to evaluate the contents of the separation of prescribing and dispensing roles(SPD) policy based on the theoretical backgrounds. The results are as follows; Considering the purpose of SPD policy, 'increasing the efficiency in manpower management by separating the role of medical doctor and pharmacist and improving the quality of SPD service through specialization of function' as a policy objective is valid and very important agenda in health care. But the objectives are not working well by no keeping the detail means to actualize it. Also, some policy objectives are unclear or inappropriate and it makes the focus of that policy obscure or misleads inadequate policy alternatives. In terms of means of policy, it is evaluated to have some limits in effectiveness, efficiency, equity, rationality, technical feasibility, economic feasibility, administrative feasibility, social and time feasibility. In conclusion, it's necessary to investigate the some problem mentioned in this paper with empirical evidence. Also, it should be needed to improve the validity of policy by correcting policy objectives and means in execution of policy.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.327-327
• /
• 2005

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2002.10a
• /
• pp.324-325
• /
• 2002