• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제22권
• /
• pp.255-285
• /
• 2004

After more than 15 years of negotiations, China was finally able to achieve the WTO membership, opening up new trade opportunities for China as well as existing WTO members. China accepted a special safeguard mechanism as one of its WTO- plus commitments. And in response, Korea has since introduced China special safeguard rules, which in simple terms, allows an invocation of safeguard measures against Chinese product imports under more lapse conditions than would normally be allowed under the existing general safeguard rules. China also introduced new safeguard rules in November 2001 in an effort to increase transparency in its operation of safeguard measures. However, the current article contends that the new rules pose a serious threat to free trade in the form of the retaliation provision, which enables China to take unilateral retaliatory actions against safeguard measures on Chinese product imports, It indicates that the provision could be operated in an arbitrary manner as the US Super 301, and lead to infringements of WTO disciplines. This paper indicates that the foregoing elements could lead to mort trade disputes between Korea China regarding safeguard measures and subsequent retaliations on the hills of the so called the Garlic War. The current article goes on to offer policy recommendations toward deterring such disputes. First, it recommends a more active invocation of Korea's own retaliatory provision against China's unilateral actions at least to gain negotiating leverage. Second, it sites problems involving China's still conspicuous state-trading practices, and proposes to raise issues again China to induce more faithful implementation of WTO disciplines Final, it stresses the importance of preventing disputes before they arise, and suggests several specific preventive measures.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.323-341
• /
• 2007

International trade conflict has been increased since WTO has appeared. Like this, the cause that the number of international trade conflict has been increased is by means of enlargement of agreements range. But some new facts have been added. They are Anti-dumping, subsidy, Countervailing duty, Safeguard, the norm of intellectual property right, the procedure of permitting importing products, Technical Barriers, agricultural products, and the area of textile. Since Japanese government has decided to give lavor import quarters to China without permission of Korea, Korean government formally presented the system of lavor import quarter to WTO DSB due to WTO agreement disobedience of Japan. Accordingly, this paper has the following purpose; to analyze situation on fiber dispute of Japan. Some methods about trade barrier against Japan need to be solved from another viewpoint owing to lavor IQ dispute.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.177-191
• /
• 2019

Global trade protectionism has increased further and U.S. priorities and protectionism have strengthened since Trump took office in 2017. Trump administration is actively implementing tariff measures based on U.S. domestic trade laws rather than the WTO rules and regulations. In particular, the American government has recently been imposing high tariffs due to national security and imposing economic sanctions on other countries' imports. According to the U.S. Trade Expansion Act Section 232, the American government imposed additional tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to WTO member countries such as China, India, and EU etc. on march 15, 2018. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether the U.S. Trade Expansion Act Section 232 is consistent with GATT/WTO rules by comparing the legal basis of US / China / WTO regulations related to Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act, and gives some suggestions for responding to the Section 232 measure. As the Section 232 measure exceeded the scope of GATT's Security Exceptions regulation and is very likely to be understood as a safeguard measure. If so, the American government is deemed to be in breach of WTO's regulations, such as the most-favored-nation treatment obligations and the duty reduction obligations. In addition, American government is deemed to be failed to meet the conditions of initiation of safeguard measure and violated the procedural requirements such as notification and consultation. In order to respond to these U.S. protection trade measures, all affected countries should actively use the WTO multilateral system to prevent unfair measures. Also, it is necessary to revise the standard jurisdiction of the dispute settlement body and to explore the balance of the WTO Exception clause so that it can be applied strictly. Finally, it would be necessary for Chinese exporters to take a counter-strategy under such trade pressure.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제13권12호
• /
• pp.702-714
• /
• 2013

한중일은 새로운 경제성장을 위한 고민과 더불어 외자를 유치함에 있어 새로운 도전과 어려움에 직면해 있다. 향후 한중일 FTA는 3국간의 투자를 더욱 촉진 할 것으로 기대되고 있다. 이 논문은 한중일 3국간의 투자에 관한 법적체계와 제약요소 및 투자규칙에 관한 연구를 하였다. 3국간의 무역경제 관계와 투자흐름을 검토하고, 이를 배경으로 3국의 외국투자에 관한 법적체계 및 투자규칙에 관한 검토를 통하여 상대국에 있어서 투자에 관한 주요한 제약이 무엇인지, 향후 한중일 FTA는 3국간의 투자를 더욱 촉진하기 위해서는 한중일 FTA 투자 장(章)에 포함해야 할 것이 무엇인지를 제시하고자 하였다. 한중일 FTA는 3방향의 투자 흐름을 원활화하고 3국간에 투자자와 투자보호를 강화하기위한 효과적인 수단이 될 것이다. 이 점에서 향후 한중일 FTA 투자 장은 내국민 대우, 최혜국대우, 특정조치의 이행요구의 금지 및 경영진이나 이사회의 국적 요건, 자금의 이전, 세이프가드 조치, 수용 및 보상, 손실에 대한 보상, 공정 형평 대우, 투자자 대 국가의 분쟁 해결 및 3국 간 합의 된 다른 요소를 포함해야한다.