• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.55-57
• /
• 2017

A 64-year-old man was admitted due to jaundice for 2 weeks. Radiologic findings revealed biliary stricture at the hepatic hilum with intrahepatic duct dilation suggesting Bismuth type IV Klatskin tumor. Jaundice improved spontaneously several days after hospitalization. Surgical treatment was considered but he only wanted to observe without specific treatment. Ten months later, he was re-admitted due to the recurrence of jaundice. Computed tomography (CT) showed no significant difference compared to previous results. Serum cancer antigen 19-9 and Immunoglobulin G4 were normal. Endoscopic forcep biopsy during endoscopic retrograde cholagiopancreatography (ERCP) revealed chronic inflammation. After steroid use under possible diagnosis of IgG4 related cholangiopathy, biliary stricture improved slightly. Four years later, he was hospitalized with the occurrence of acute cholangitis. Endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage was performed following endobiliary forcep biopsy. Pathology revealed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma at this time. Combined chemotherapy based on gemcitabine and cisplatin was performed. Six months later, CT revealed partial response.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.41-62
• /
• 2021

Radiologic imaging is important for evaluating extrahepatic bile duct (EHD) cancers; it is used for staging tumors and evaluating the suitability of surgical resection, as surgery may be contraindicated in some cases regardless of tumor stage. However, the published general recommendations for EHD cancer and recommendations guided by the perspectives of radiologists are limited. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) study group for EHD cancer developed key questions and corresponding recommendations for the radiologic evaluation of EHD cancer and organized them into 4 sections: nomenclature and definition, imaging technique, cancer evaluation, and tumor response. A structured reporting form was also developed to allow the progressive accumulation of standardized data, which will facilitate multicenter studies and contribute more evidence for the development of recommendations.

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.74-77
• /
• 2005

A neurolytic celiac plexus block produces long-lasting pain relief in upper abdominal cancer patients. Unwanted side effects such as local pain, hypotension, and diarrhea are common but the durations of these side effects are usually transient. Chronic diarrhea induced by a neurolytic celiac plexus block is rarely reported and is considered to be an autonomic neuropathy due to sympathetic denervation. A 73-year-old Klatskin tumor patient developed chronic diarrhea after a neurolytic celiac plexus block and the diarrhea was sustained for 3 months despite the use of conventional antidiarrheal treatments. We report a case of chronic diarrhea that was induced by a neurolytic celiac plexus block.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제24권10호
• /
• pp.983-995
• /
• 2023

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement between contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for evaluating the resectability in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included treatment-naïve patients with pathologically confirmed eCCA, who underwent both CECT and CE-MRI with MRCP using extracellular contrast media between January 2015 and December 2020. Among the 214 patients (146 males; mean age ± standard deviation, 68 ± 9 years) included, 121 (56.5%) had perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. R0 resection was achieved in 108 of the 153 (70.6%) patients who underwent curative-intent surgery. Four fellowship-trained radiologists independently reviewed the findings of both CECT and CE-MRI with MRCP to assess the local tumor extent and distant metastasis for determining resectability. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of CECT and CE-MRI with MRCP were compared using clinical, surgical, and pathological findings as reference standards. The interobserver agreement of resectability was evaluated using Fleiss kappa (κ). Results: No significant differences were observed between CECT and CE-MRI with MRCP in the pooled AUC (0.753 vs. 0.767), sensitivity (84.7% [366/432] vs. 90.3% [390/432]), and specificity (52.6% [223/424] vs. 51.4% [218/424]) (P > 0.05 for all). The AUC for determining resectability was higher when CECT and CE-MRI with MRCP were reviewed together than when CECT was reviewed alone in patients with discrepancies between the imaging modalities or with indeterminate resectability (0.798 [0.754-0.841] vs. 0.753 [0.697-0.808], P = 0.014). The interobserver agreement for overall resectability was fair for both CECT (κ = 0.323) and CE-MRI with MRCP (κ = 0.320), without a significant difference (P = 0.884). Conclusion: CECT and CE-MRI with MRCP showed no significant differences in the diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in determining the resectability in patients with eCCA.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.267-275
• /
• 1992

원격조정 고선량 근접치료는 새로운 각광받는 테크놀로지이다. 이에, 저자들은 3년간의 서울중앙병원의 590횟수, 116 환자를 대상으로 고선량 근접치료의 그 시술과 임상적 결과를 평가해 보고자 한다 자궁경부암 58 환자와 비인두강암 26 환자의 관내 방사선치료 471 횟수, 식도암 12 환자, 내 기관지암 11 환자, 클라스킨 종양 1 환자의 관내 방사선치료 79 횟수와 유방암 4 환자, 육종 1 환자, 요도암 1 환자의 조직내 방사선치료 40 횟수가 1989년 9월에서 1992년 8월 사이에 시행되어졌다. 추적 관찰 기간은 1 개월에서 35개월이었고, 그 중간 기간은 7개월이었다. 조직내 방사선치료를 제외한 모든 시술은 국소 마취로 시행하였고, 모든 환자에서 급성 합병증은 생기지 않았다. 또한, 6 환자를 제외하고는 모두 계획 선량대로 치료를 마칠 수가 있었다. 자궁경부암 58 환자에서, 비인두강암 26 환자 중 20 환자에서 완전 관해가 일어났으며, 증상 완화 목적으로 치료한 15 환자에서 $80{\%}$의 환자에서 소기의 목적을 이룰 수 있었다. 이 논문에서 원격조정 고선량 근접치료의 자세한 시술과 그에 따른 결과를 설명할 것이다. 이 치료의 생물학적인 효과와 적당한 선량/선량 횟수/분할치료를 평가하기 위해, 우리는 더욱 긴 추적 관찰을 시행하여야 하며, 이 새로운 근접치료 시술이 저선량 근접치로 시술보다 효과적이고 외래 환자로 통근 치료가 가능하며, 안전한 치료 방법이라고 생각하고 있다.

• Gut and Liver
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.722-727
• /
• 2018

Background/Aims: Although endoscopic bilateral stent-instent placement is challenging, many recent studies have reported promising outcomes regarding technical success and endoscopic re-intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the technical accessibility of stent-in-stent placement using large cell-type stents in patients with inoperable malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Methods: Forty-three patients with inoperable malignant hilar biliary obstruction from four academic centers were prospectively enrolled from March 2013 to June 2015. Results: Bilateral stent-in-stent placement using two large cell-type stents was successfully performed in 88.4% of the patients (38/43). In four of the five cases with technical failure, the delivery sheath of the second stent became caught in the hook-cross-type vertex of the large cell of the first stent, and subsequent attempts to pass a guidewire and stent assembly through the mesh failed. Functional success was achieved in all cases of technical success. Stent occlusion occurred in 63.2% of the patients (24/38), with a median patient survival of 300 days. The median stent patency was 198 days. The stent patency rate was 82.9%, 63.1%, and 32.1% at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Endoscopic re-intervention was performed in 14 patients, whereas 10 underwent percutaneous drainage. Conclusions: Large cell-type stents for endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement had acceptable functional success and stent patency when technically successful. However, the technical difficulty associated with the entanglement of the second stent delivery sheath in the hook-cross-type vertex of the first stent may preclude large cell-type stents from being considered as a dedicated standard tool for stent-in-stent placement.