• Title/Summary/Keyword: Kaltenborn

Search Result 25, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Recent Progress in Arthrokinematic Approach(A.K.A.) Diagnosis and Treatment (관절운동학적 치료법(A.K.A.)의 최근의 진보 진단과 치료)

  • Lim, Sung-Soo
    • Journal of Korean Physical Therapy Science
    • /
    • v.5 no.3
    • /
    • pp.707-715
    • /
    • 1998
  • The technique of AKA were devised and modified several times after clinical trials to obtain better result and were though to be few years ago. The published literatures on joint mobilization were unsatisfactory to me since the subject of treatment was not confined to the synovial joint and techniques seemed too violent to treat diseased joints. Among the techniques distraction gliding and the use of convex-concave rule by F. M. Kaltenborn were acceptable theoretically but they required considerable technical modification. By that time it was evident that pain in numerous painful conditions including organic regions could be eliminated by AKA new disease entitles such as aseptic arthritis of the sacroiliac joint, hip joint, shoulder joint, 1st costovertebral joint etc and periradiculitis were elucidated.

  • PDF

Change and Development of the Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (정형물리치료의 변화와 발전)

  • Ju Mu-Yeol;Kim Seung-Joon;Park Seung-Kyu;Jung Yeon-Woo;Bae Sung-Soo
    • The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
    • /
    • v.14 no.4
    • /
    • pp.475-486
    • /
    • 2002
  • Orthopaedic manual therapy(OMT) includes knowledge in arthokinematic, biological, behavioral, biomechanical, patholology, anatomy, and clinical science. it allows proper approach to patient evaluation and program development and relieves joint and soft tissue lesions. The OMT has sports injurys, traumatic, developmental, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders of acute and chronic states, and prevention of dysfunction as well as the development, improvement, restoration, or maintenance of joint and muscular mobility, stability, relaxation, strenth, endurance, balance, and functional skills. The purpose of this article has to define and clarify the change and development of basic concepts of orthopaedic manual therapy. OMT is ancient in origin. The book of ' Manipulation Past and Present ' contains pictures recording various types of joint mobilization by Hippocrates. Recently, there are many kinds of manual therapeutic maneuvers to assess and relieve joint and soft tissue lesions developed by James Cyriax, John McM Mennell, Brian R Mullign, Robin McKenzie, Freddy Kaltenborn, Geoffrey Maitland, and Ola Grimsby.

  • PDF

Clinical Application and Limitations of the Capsular Pattern (관절낭 패턴의 임상적 적용과 한계)

  • Lim, Wootaek
    • Physical Therapy Korea
    • /
    • v.28 no.1
    • /
    • pp.13-17
    • /
    • 2021
  • A normal range of motion is essential for performing activities of daily living. The capsular pattern is the proportional motion restriction in range of motion during passive exercises due to tightness of the joint capsule. Although the capsular pattern is widely referred to in clinical practice, there is no scientific evidence to support the concept. In this review, the appropriateness of the capsular pattern for evaluation of joint pathology was assessed. In the Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine written by Cyriax, the capsular pattern did not specify how much reduction in angular motion is considered motion restriction. As the definition proposed initially was unclear, different methods have been used in previous studies investigating capsular pattern. In addition, the capsular pattern described all the major joints of the human body, but only the hip joint, knee joint, and shoulder joint were studied in experimental studies. Sensitivity and specificity were reported in one study and were meaningful in specific pathologies (loss of extension to loss of flexion). There was no consensus on the reliability and validity. In summary, the capsular pattern suggested by Cyriax or Kaltenborn is not supported or applies only to certain conditions. Various components around a joint complement each other and provide stability to the joint. It is recommended that the therapist perform multiple assessments rather than rely on a single assessment when evaluating joints.

The effect of cervical stabilized exercise and joint mobilization on maximum muscle strength and static muscle endurance of cervical region (경추안정화운동과 경추관절가동술이 경부의 최대근력과 정적근지구력에 미치는 영향)

  • Gong, Won-Tae;Cheun, Hyeung-Jae;Lee, Kyeong-Mok
    • Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.33-42
    • /
    • 2010
  • The purpose of this study was to identify cervical stabilized exercise and joint mobilization, the difference between them, and the maximum muscle strength and static muscle endurance of each group after the enforcement to general people. Cervical joint mobilization group refers to interarticular exercise (traction, pressure, glide) using with Kaltenborn technique. 3 classes were divided into 20 people each, cervical joint mobilization and stabilized exercise, and the comparison groups were randomized for the study. Both cervical stabilized exercise and joint mobilization increased maximum muscle strength and static muscle endurance. Patients should be able improve muscle stabilization and deep cervical muscle by using joint mobilization when the patient is unable to exercise on their own.

Effect of nerve mobilization with intermittent cervical segment traction on pain, range of motion, endurance, and disability of cervical radiculopathy

  • Yun, Young-Ho;Lee, Byoung-Kwon;Yi, Jae-Hoon;Seo, Dong-Kwon
    • Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science
    • /
    • v.9 no.3
    • /
    • pp.149-154
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the Kaltenborn-Evjenth concept of nerve mobilization combined with intermittent cervical segment traction (ICST) on pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, range of motion (ROM) and endurance in persons with cervical radiculopathy (CR). Design: Two-group pretest-posttest design. Methods: Thirty subjects participated in this study and were randomly assigned to two groups. The ICST group (n=15) was performed simultaneously with nerve mobilization and cervical traction for the segment with cervical pain at the same time. The intermittent cervical total traction (ICTT) group (n=15) performed nerve mobilization and cervical traction for the whole cervical area at the same time. In this study, outcome measures such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), NDI, ROM, endurance (cranio-cervical flexion test), and passive intervertebral motion performed before and 4 weeks after the experiment were compared to investigate the effects of each intervention. Results: In both groups, there were significant differences in the VAS, NDI scores, and endurance, and there were significant differences between the two groups except for endurance (p<0.05). In the ICST group, significant differences were found in all ROM, and in the ICTT group, significant differences were found in only extension, and there were significant differences between the two groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: The ICST group showed more improvement than the ICTT group in pain, NDI scores and ROM. Moreover, our findings show that the ICST could be used as a new strategy for manual therapy in persons with CR.