• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.13-25
• /
• 2015

This paper proposes an extended model evaluation method that considers not only the model performance but also the model structure and parameter uncertainties in hydrologic modeling. A simple reservoir model (SFM) and distributed kinematic wave models (KWMSS1 and KWMSS2 using topography from 250-m, 500-m, and 1-km digital elevation models) were developed and assessed by three evaluative criteria for model performance, model structural stability, and parameter identifiability. All the models provided acceptable performance in terms of a global response, but the simpler SFM and KWMSS1 could not accurately represent the local behaviors of hydrographs. Moreover, SFM and KWMSS1 were structurally unstable; their performance was sensitive to the applied objective functions. On the other hand, the most sophisticated model, KWMSS2, performed well, satisfying both global and local behaviors. KMSS2 also showed good structural stability, reproducing hydrographs regardless of the applied objective functions; however, superior parameter identifiability was not guaranteed. A number of parameter sets could result in indistinguishable hydrographs. This result indicates that while making hydrologic models complex increases its performance accuracy and reduces its structural uncertainty, the model is likely to suffer from parameter uncertainty.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.591-595
• /
• 2010

Conventional methods of model evaluation usually rely only on model performance based on a comparison of simulated variables to corresponding observations. However, this type of model evaluation has been criticized because of its insufficient consideration of the various uncertainty sources involved in modeling processes. This study aims to propose an extended model evaluation method using multiple assesment indices (MAIs) that consider not only the model performance but also the model structure and parameter uncertainties in rainfall-runoff modeling. A simple reservoir model (SFM) and distributed kinematic wave models (KWMSS1 and KWMSS2 using topography from 250m, 500m, and 1km digital elevation models) were developed and assessed by three MAIs for model performance, model structural stability, and parameter identifiability. All the models provided acceptable performance in terms of a global response, but the simpler SFM and KWMSS1 could not accurately represent the local behaviors of hydrographs. In addition, SFM and KWMSS1 were structurally unstable; their performance was sensitive to the applied objective functions. On the other hand, the most sophisticated model, KWMSS2, performed well, satisfying both global and local behaviors. KMSS2 also showed good structural stability, reproducing hydrographs regardless of the applied objective functions; however, superior parameter identifiability was not guaranteed. Numerous parameter sets could lead to indistinguishable hydrographs. This result supports that while making a model complex increases its performance accuracy and reduces its structural uncertainty, the model is likely to suffer from parameter uncertainty. The proposed model evaluation process can provide an effective guideline for identifying a reliable hydrologic model.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2018.05a
• /
• pp.10-10
• /
• 2018

기후변화로 인한 집중호우의 빈도 및 강도가 증가하여 치수 구조물의 설계 홍수 빈도를 초과하는 피해가 발생하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 침수 피해를 저감하기 위해 수치예보자료를 활용한 홍수 예 경보시스템의 적용성을 비교 평가하였다. 수치예보자료는 국내 기상청에서 제공하는 국지예보모델(LDAPS)과 일본 기상청의 중규모모델(Meso-scale Model ; MSM)을 이용하였으며, 남강댐 유역 내의 산청 유역에 대해 태풍 및 정체 전선 등 3 개의 강우사상을 선정하였다. 강우유출 해석에는 분포형 수문 모형인 KWMSS(Kinematic Wave Method for Subsurface and Surface)를 이용하였다. 그 결과, LDAPS와 MSM 모두 강우발생 유무를 잘 재현하였다. 특히, 광역적 강우인 태풍사상에 대해 강우 예측에서 비교적 높은 정확도를 나타내었다. 강우 예측의 정확도 향상을 위해 강우장의 공간 변위를 고려하여 앙상블 강우 분포를 적용한 결과, 강우 예측의 정확도가 향상되는 것으로 나타났다. 홍수 예측의 경우 두 수치예보자료 모두 유출 패턴을 잘 재현하였다. 앙상블 홍수 예측 결과, 단일 강우 자료를 통한 홍수 예측에서의 예측 불확실성을 개선하는 것으로 나타났다. 3개의 강우 사상에 대해 MSM의 예측 결과가 LDAPS의 예측 결과보다 비교적 높은 상관관계를 나타내었다. 본 연구를 통해 강우 및 홍수 예측에 수치예보자료의 적용 가능성이 있다고 판단되며, 홍수 예 경보의 기초자료로 활용성이 있다고 판단된다.