• Title/Summary/Keyword: Irreality

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Comparative Study of Sartre's imagination theory and Dufrenne's aesthetic theory on a Concept of 'analogon' (사르트르의 상상력 이론과 뒤프렌의 미학 이론의 접점 - 아날로공 개념을 중심으로)

  • Ji, Young-Rae
    • Korean Association for Visual Culture
    • /
    • v.35
    • /
    • pp.5-33
    • /
    • 2019
  • This paper examines the problems of the concept of 'analogon' which occupies an important place in Jean-Paul Sartre's theory of imagination and his 'aesthetic of the unreal', focusing on Michel Dufrenne's objection to the concept. In the Imaginary (1940), Sartre offers a phenomenological account of the imaginative experience and his theory of imagination provides the basis for his account of experience of art. Sartre distinguishes the imagining consciousness from the realizing consciousness of perception. The work of art, for Sartre, is transformed into an irreal thing ("The work of art is irreality."), i.e. it appears only as aesthetic object, and only under the condition that the spectator's consciousness changes into an imagining consciousness. Some claim that Sartre underemphasizes the function of materiality in artworks. Mikel Dufrenne, in his The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience (1953), criticizes Sartre's thesis of irreality. Dufrenne argues that the aesthetic object is the work of art accomplished by aesthetic perception, the meaning of the aesthetic object is given as a whole in the sensuous and does not refer to something that lies outside the object as with imagination or irreality. An affective a priori is the condition of possibility for the occurrence of aesthetic experience.

A Study on the Fantastic and Reality in Animation (애니메이션의 환상성과 리얼리티에 대한 연구)

  • Lee, Youn-Hee
    • Cartoon and Animation Studies
    • /
    • s.12
    • /
    • pp.87-102
    • /
    • 2007
  • Animation techniques that can freely create any movement of color and shape produce strong attraction by visualizing fantasy. Like animation, fantasy is often misunderstood that it has nothing to do with reality, but it is not the case. Fantasy introduces a little confusion in our symbolic order by reorganizing elements from reality and commonness. This confusion, which becomes desire, induces attraction. However, the confusion beyond our comprehension creates total chaos in which we cannot be interested. Attraction happens only when the introduced confusion is far less than the total symbolic order which has already been established. The images of animation are neither completely mundane to us nor beyond our comprehension; thus, animation produces attraction by offering us images that stimulate our unconscious desire.

  • PDF