• 경영과학
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.145-165
• /
• 2004

Frequently. lots of organizations have experienced the value discrepancy between the expected value and the realized value from IS (information systems) investments. Being positive or negative the difference is. however, the existence of discrepancy itself is an evidence of less-than-sound management and measurement of IS projects. Analyzing the factors that cause such discrepancy has become an issue of scrutiny both in academia and in practice. We model which factors. as predictors, will affect the value discrepancy, as dependent variables. in IS investment. This research will establish and examine the research model. the validity of category classification of value discrepancy factors and the perceptual level of IS value discrepancy by survey research. As a result of the survey research. the strategic alignment. the proper system design for staffs. the project planning capability. and interdepartmental task cooperation are perceived as the factors that significantly affect the value discrepancy. And known as IS success factors such as the managerial support, the change management, the standardized process. and the competitive investment are not significant factors. The research findings will provide and emphasize useful implications which factors should be deliberately investigated in IS investment both for practices considering IS deployment and for academia.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2020

Korean firms have been vigorously searching and exploring overseas market opportunities through export and overseas investment. As of end of 2019, there were more than 80,000 Korean overseas subsidiaries all over the world. With Korean overseas direct investment increasing recently, it became one of the important issues for overseas investors to be successful in the global market. There are a lot of studies on factors influencing the performance of overseas subsidiaries such as 'firm' and 'country' factors. This study empirically examines subsidiary performance determinants with 'industry architectures' by using a sample of 292 overseas Korean firm subsidiaries. Industry architectures are the stable but evolving sets of rules and roles through which labor is divided within a sector. This article considers how industry architectures shape success in international expansion. Industry architectures differ between countries, are not necessarily technologically determined, shape firms' capabilities and their competitive environment, and constitute a distinct level of analysis. We extract antecedents of related theory and empirically test its impact with a survey of Korean firms expanding in emerging economies. We would say this is the first study which tries to focus on industry architectures with the performance of Korean overseas subsidiaries. We find that separability and similarity of industry architectures across countries and localization of subsidiaries are robust and important predictors of success in international expansion. Our results suggest that industry architectures should be added to firm and country as an intermediate level of analysis that helps explain success in international expansion. While we established a pattern, much more remains to be done. We focus on the success of foreign operations, but we do not consider the broader benefits of going abroad, such as the learning or network effects that accrue at the level of the entire firm. The next obvious question is whether the results would differ in the developed market context. These we leave for future research to consider.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2024

오늘날 세계 경제는 전례 없는 변동성과 함께 전통적인 투자 지표 또한 변화하며, '투자 동절기'라 불리는 시기가 도래했다. 이러한 상황에서 초기 단계의 스타트업은 즉각적인 수익 창출의 어려움으로 인해 자금 확보의 필요성을 절감하고 있다. 특히 재무 지표만이 투자 평가의 지표로 인정받던 과거와 달리, 부차적인 요소였던 조직문화가 회복 탄력성과 지속 가능성을 판단하는 핵심 요소로 부상하고 있다. 본 연구는 경쟁 가치 프레임워크(Competing Values Framework)와 조직문화 평가 도구(Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument)의 체계적 연구 접근법을 결합하여 투자자가 매력적으로 느끼는 초기 단계의 스타트업 조직문화 사이의 복잡한 상호작용을 심도있게 탐구하였다. 분석 결과, 외부 시장 환경에 적극적으로 반응하며 조직의 유연성과 안정성을 균형 있게 유지하는 스타트업 일수록 투자자의 관심을 받고 있다는 사실을 확인하였다. 또한 초기 단계의 스타트업 투자를 결정하는 과정에서 애드호크라시 문화와 마켓 문화 중심적 사고 방식이 중추적인 역할을 한다는 것을 강조하고 있다. 그리고 이번 연구 결과에서 주목할 만한 부분은 스타트업이 투자 유치 여부와 관계없이 구성원 관리에 있어서만큼은 클랜 문화를 지향하고 있으며, 이를 통해 조직 내에서 복지와 개인의 발전을 지원하는 것의 중요성을 다시 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 투자자들에게 주목을 받기 위한 핵심 요소로서, 마켓 문화 기반의 강한 리더십, 혁신을 향한 확고한 의지, 조직 내의 조화로운 협업이 강조되었다. 본 연구에서 도출된 로지스틱 회귀 모델은 88.3%라는 높은 예측 정확도를 보이며 초기 단계의 스타트업 조직문화와 성공적인 투자 유치 사이의 연관성을 깊이 있게 제시하고 있다. 이처럼 본 연구는 스타트업과 투자자들 모두에게 근거있는 가이드라인을 제공함으로써 학문적 및 실용적 측면에서 큰 의의를 지닌다.