• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.907-937
• /
• 2018

This study analyzed the policy decision process of the International Science Business Belt (ISBB) applying multiple stream model combining Kingdon (2013) and Howlett et al. (2014) models. We looked at what socio-political factors influenced the process and sought to find ways to promote the project of ISBB and the policy of basic science in the future. As a concrete analysis, the policy decision process was divided into policy, policy formation, and implementation policy, and the streams of problem, process, policy and politics, policy window, and policy participant were used as variables. As a result of the analysis, the stream of politics and the role of the policy-entrepreneur played an important role in the policy decision process. Politicians and government officials were more involved than the scientists.

• Journal of the Korean Professional Engineers Association
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.54-60
• /
• 2009

On January of this year, the 29th National Science and Technology Council, presided by President M.B. Lee, officially finalized a contract for a big project to build an International Science and Business Belt(ISBB) that includes the establishment of a new institute, the Asian Basic Science Institute (ABSI) and the construction of a Rare Isotope Accelerator. The government will inject more than 3.5 trillion Wan into the ISBB project. The investment to build the care laboratory for the project, the heavy ion accelerator, the first one in Korea, will be 460 billion Wan, Korea thus aiming to build an accelerator with world-class performance. This will be the sixth in the world. The construction will start from 2012, and is planned to finish by 2015. ABSI, whose construction will be finished by 2012, is planned to be a care laboratory with 3,000 scientists and staff. To. attract world class researchers and other professionals from aver the world, the project includes the creation of a new city with a superb educational, cultural environment, and comfortable living environment for an international community. The site for this new science and business city, "scientific ecosystem", has not been officially decided yet, and supposed to be announced in the first half af this year.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.139-148
• /
• 2016

The importance of technology commercialization is being emphasized more and more, but high technology excellence does not always lead to a successful business. In addition, companies that invest heavily in basic research and technology development are also not always able to guarantee high profits. This is due to the technical problems when present in step research and development levels are difficult to commercialize. And the market will not work rationally is also the cause of the problem. Therefore, to effectively utilize the resources necessary to ensure such partners to build alliances and cooperation with external funding or manpower is crucial to commercialize the research results of basic science successfully. In previous studies, it has been made many studies in accordance with the approach to the technology (e.g. Research and Development, Management of Technology, Technology Innovation, etc.). But the study of technology commercialization point of view is not being done much. This study should explores the available business required, or realized in the process of researching the basic science and trying to understand the imperfections of the market through the property of technology (tacit knowledge, objectified value of technology and the information asymmetry between innovation subjects, etc.). In addition, this paper, we try to focus on a strategic approach to the role of International Science Business Belt (ISBB) with success in science and technology business as appropriate countermeasures about breaking the 'Valley of Death.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.81-109
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 Kingdon(1984)과 Howlett(2014) 모델을 결합한 수정모델을 적용하여 국제과학비즈니스벨트의 정책결정과정을 분석하였다. 그 과정에서 어떠한 사회 정치적 요인들이 영향을 미쳤는지에 대해 알아보고 향후, 국제과학비즈니스벨트 사업과 거대기초과학 정책 추진방향을 모색하고자 하였다. 구체적인 분석은 정책결정과정을 정책의재, 정책형성, 정책집행의 단계로 구분하고, 문제 과정 정책 정치의 흐름과 창, 정책선도자를 변수로 활용하였다. 분석결과, 정책결정과정에서 정치의 흐름과 정책선도자의 역할이 중요하게 작용하였고, 과학자 집단보다는 정치가들과 정부 관료자들이 주도적으로 참여하였으며 그 과정속에서 정치적 혼란을 겪으며 급진적으로 진행되었다는 점을 알 수 있었다.