• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.161-189
• /
• 2009

서브프라임 사태로 외환위기시 경외의 대상이었던 미국 투자은행의 몰락은 금융감독의 중요성을 인식하게 되었고, 자본시장의 발전을 도모하기 위해 제정된 자본시장법의 역할 모델이 미국 투자은행이었다는 점에서 우려가 제기되고 있는 것도 사실이다. 본 연구에서는 금융회사의 건전성 규제중 핵심인 자기자본규제가 미래에 출현할 투자은행에 대한 위험을 사전에 예방가능한지에 대해 다음과 같이 검증하였다. 먼저 미국투자은행이 우리나라 자본시장법상 자기자본규제를 적용받았다면 최소규제비율을 초과하는지, 금융투자회사가 미국 투자은행처럼 유동화자산의 재 유동화를 통해 자산 부채를 동시에 증가시키는 경우에도 예방효과가 있는지, 마지막으로 자기자본규제 비율 산정시 사용된 위험액은 내부모형을 통해 산출된 것으로 모형 자체의 문제점은 없었는지를 국내 은행의 내부모형과 비교를 통해 검증하였다. 검증결과 미국 투자은행에 대한 규제비율은 일정 수준 이하로 나왔으나 이는 사후적인 결과로 예방효과가 있다고 결론 내리기 어려우며, 특히 재 유동화를 통한 자산 부채가 동시에 증가하는 경우 현행 영업용순자본비율(NCR)규제가 비율 규제인 관계로 실질적인 제한 효과는 크지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 아울러, 내부모형의 타당성 검증에서도 지역적으로 글로벌하게 다양한 업무를 영위하였던 투자은행과 국내은행간 위험분산 비중이 유의적인 차이를 보였으며, 분산효과의 원인인 위험 요인간 상관관계 방향이 동일한 점등을 감안할 때 내부모형 자체의 치명적인 결함은 있다고 보기는 어려웠다. 따라서 복잡하고 이해하기 어려운 건전성 규제 비율이 사전적인 예방에 크게 도움이 되지 않고 한계가 있다면, 구체적 실행도구로서 부채비율과 같은 단순한 기준이 오히려 유용할 수 있다는 점이다.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.1-38
• /
• 2019

Given capital market imperfections, an entrepreneur can alleviate financial frictions by creating a pyramidal business group in which a parent firm offers its subsidiary firm internal finance. This endogenous creation of pyramidal business groups can beget asymmetric financial frictions between business-group firms and stand-alone firms. I build a model to show that these asymmetric financial frictions can have sizable effects on resource allocation. On one hand, the financial advantage of pyramidal business groups can foster productive firms by incorporating them as subsidiaries. On the other hand, the asymmetrically large amount of external capital controlled by pyramidal business groups can be expended by unproductive business-group firms and push up the equilibrium price of capital. The model suggests that with fine investor protection or low financial frictions, the benefits of pyramidal business groups can be dominated by their costs because the probability of fostering productive subsidiaries diminishes as the efficiency of external capital markets improves, while the prevalence of pyramidal business groups is not attenuated due to their continuing asymmetric financial advantage.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.207-223
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 국내 금융회사중 내부모형을 승인받아 사용하고 있는 국내 은행의 실제 위험유형별 자료를 이용하여 시장위험과 신용위험간 관계를 고려한 통합위험을 측정하였으며, 이를 통하여 위험유형간 분산효과가 존재하는지 검증해 보았다. 검증방법은 법규상 규제자본과 내부모형을 통해 산출되는 시장위험과 신용위험의 단순 합산 및 위험액 자체에 직접 임의의 상관관계를 고려하는 단순통합모형을 이용하여 비교 검증하였다. 실증분석 결과, 다음과 같은 사실들을 확인할 수 있었는데, 먼저 내부모형은 시장위험에서는 평균적으로 규제자본에 비해 40.4%, 신용위험은 45.4%의 분산효과를 보였으며, 통계적으로도 유의한 차이를 보였다. 이는 내부모형의 경우 하위 위험요인간 분산효과로 인하여 규제자본에 비해 필요자본이 작아진 다는 것을 의미한다. 다음으로 실무에서 이용하는 위험액 자체에 임의의 상관관계를 적용하여 산출한 단순 통합위험을 경제적 자본의 대용치인 내부모형의 단순합산과 비교해 본 결과 분산효과는 크지 않았으며, 통계적으로도 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 은행의 시장위험이 신용위험에 비해 규모면에서 과소하여 분산효과가 크게 나타나지 않는 것으로 설명할 수 있다.

• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.63-91
• /
• 2009

This paper tests the validity of pecking order theory by Myers(1977) and Myers and Majluf(1984) on Korean manufacturing firms listed in the KRX for the years of 1994 to 2003. We also want to see if there is any difference in financing behavior between chaebol affiliated firms and non-chaebol affiliated firms. We develop testable hypotheses from the idea that established relationship between bank and firm mitigates the problem of information asymmetry (Kang and Lim, 2001), and thus makes it easier for firms to raise funds through banks. The test result of the first stage shows that firms prefer cash reserves to debt financing, and prefer debt to equity. Chaebol affiliated firms are found to behave as if they already exploit internal capital markets. The second stage of the test carried out by dividing debt capital into bank loans and corporate bonds also shows a consistent pattern of financing behavior. Firms are testified to prefer cash to bank loans, bank loans to corporate bonds, and corporate bonds to equity. In this case chaebol affiliation seems to make firms behave as if they already establish internal capital markets. Further analysis shows that some, though not in every case, difference of ordering around the occasion of Korean financial crisis exists. It may be from the change of attitude of Korean firms to risk, or from weakened influence of internal capital market along with strengthened market power in the post-crisis period.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권12호
• /
• pp.703-710
• /
• 2020

The stock market serves as a representation of economic well-being in a country. Along with the myriad of economic predictors, specific knowledge possession may lead to different macro consequences of stock performance and market value. This study empirically investigates the capacity of possessing excellent intellectual capital to increase the performance and values of listed banks in Indonesia. The selection of banks as the primary data represents such sectors' capability to attract, employ, or exploit the excellent internal capacity under the discussion of resource-based view theory. At best to the authors' knowledge, this topic's findings are still elusive and debatable upon considering the direct and indirect relationships between the proposed exogenous and endogenous variables. Eighteen listed banks form the panel data throughout 2011-2016. This study employs a path analysis and Sobel test to obtain the results of the proposed hypothesis. The results report some positive relationships of the intellectual capital to firms' performances and values, directly and indirectly, with a substantial effect on the second model compared to the first model. This study highlighted knowledge's capacity as a vital basis to gauge the banks' performance and valuation. However, a better formulation of intellectual capital is required to capture a better measurement.

• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.33-68
• /
• 2008

본 연구에서는 전통적 자본구조 이론인 정태적 상충이론과 자본조달순위이론 뿐만 아니라 최근 새로 등장하고 있는 시장적시성이론의 타당성과 거시 경제변수가 자본구조에 미치는 영향을 종합적인 틀에서 분석하였다. 목표자본구조 결정과 자본조달 선택의 2단계 분석 결과, 자본구조의 특정이론이 일관성 있게 지지되기보다는 각 이론이 부분적으로 지지되는 결과가 나타났다. 1단계 목표자본구조 식의 추정에 있어서 기업 특성변수의 계수는 전반적으로 정태적 상충이론보다는 자본조달순위이론을 지지하였으나 2단계의 자본조달 선택요인의 분석에서는 정태적 상충이론에서 주장하듯 기업이 목표자본구조를 설정하고 이를 추구하는 경향이 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한, 자금이 부족한 기업일수록 회사채보다는 오히려 주식을 발행하는 경향이 강한 것으로 나타나 단순한 형태의 자본조달순위이론의 예측과는 부합하지 않았다. 그러나 주가가 상대적으로 고평가된 기업일수록 회사채보다 주식을 발행할 가능성이 높게 나타나 시장적시성이론이 지지되는 결과를 보였다. 한편 본 연구에서는 Korajczyk and Levy(2003)와 달리 기간 스프레드와 신용 스프레드 등 거시경제 변수가 자본구조 결정에 미치는 영향은 미미하였고, 재무적 제약이 있는 기업보다 재무적 제약이 없는 기업이 자본조달 시기를 조절할 수 있기 때문에 거시경제 변수나 시장 적시성 변수의 영향이 더 클 것이라는 그들의 주장을 지지하는 직접적 증거도 발견되지 않았다.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.119-133
• /
• 2014

Prior to the 2000s, internal control had not been among the high priority issues in the management's agenda. Since then, however, it has become one of the hottest issues, and has received a significant attention as the means of improving the transparency, sustainability, and competitiveness of a company. The objectives of this paper are to examine if there has been any noticeable changes in the level of internal controls of Korean companies before and after the 2010, and to analyze the underlying drivers and issues thereto. Accounting manipulation and moral hazard were among the factors to cause the Korean financial crisis in 1997 and 2008. Since then, the capital market has had a strong pressure on Korean companies to enhance the transparency of management and accounting while the government has made the laws, requirements, and recommendations to alleviate the moral hazard problems of management and enhance the accounting transparency. Both market and government have driven companies to put more priority on the reliability of financial reporting and the compliance of applicable laws and regulations. Thereby, the market and governmental forces has led companies to enhance the level of internal controls which contribute to the reliability of financial reporting and the compliance The pressure on companies to enhance the level of internal controls may be different across industries. The capital market and government experiencing the severe financial crisis in 1997 and 2008 put even more pressure on financial companies such as banks to upgrade the reliability of financial reporting and the compliance of regulations to the global level than on non-financial companies. A survey is performed on the changes in the level of internal controls of 54 major companies consisting of 10 financial and 44 non-financial companies in Korea. The survey results show that the average level of internal controls of Korean companies has noticeably improved and that the change in the level of control environment factor is higher than that of IT control factor. The analysis on the industry differences shows that financial companies increased the level of control environment factor more than non-financial companies did while non-financial companies upgraded the level of IT control factor more than financial companies did relatively. Among internal control categories, the most improved area since the economic crisis is "Risk Assessment." The global best practices for risk management have been developed primarily in the financial industry and then spread to other industries. The general level of control practices of Korean companies has been improving significantly, but still appears below the global advanced practices.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.113-134
• /
• 2018

This study examines the roles of intangible and tangible resources of Korean business groups on internationalization by their member firms. Specifically, we argue that not all affiliates receive same benefit from group-level resource sharing. Instead, the effect of group-level knowledge sharing on affiliates' internationalization depends on individual affiliates' relative financial positions within a business group. Using samples of business groups in Korea, chaebols, hereafter chaebols, we find that foreign market knowledge at the group level has a positive impact on the internationalization of affiliated firms while the product knowledge has no impact. Furthermore, we also find evidences that an affiliate with high level of financial capacity receives internal pressures to stay in domestic market to secure internal capital market and support other sister affiliates' international activities.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제11권12호
• /
• pp.39-45
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The stock price delay phenomenon refers to a phenomenon in which stock prices do not immediately reflect corporate information and the reflection is delayed. A prior study reported that the stock price delay phenomenon appears strongly when the quality of corporate information is low (Callen, Khan, & Lu, 2013). The purpose of the internal accounting control system is to improve the reliability of accounting information. Specifically, the more professionals such as certified public accountants are placed in the internal accounting control system, the more information is prevented from being distorted, so the occurrence of stock price delay will decrease. Research design, data and methodology: In this study, companies listed on the securities market from 2012 to 2016 were selected as a sample to analyze whether the stock price delay phenomenon is alleviated as accounting experts are assigned to the internal accounting control system. The internal control personnel data were collected in the "Internal Accounting Control System Operation Report" attached to the business report of each company of the Financial Supervisory Service's Electronic Disclosure System(DART). The measurement method of the stock price delay phenomenon was referred to the study of Hou and Moskowitz (2005). The final sample used in the study is 2,641 firm-years. Results: It was found that companies with certified accountants in the internal accounting control system alleviate the stock price delay phenomenon. This result can be interpreted as increasing the speed at which corporate information is reflected in the stock price by improving the reliability of information disclosed in the market by the placement of experts in the system. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that accounting professionals assigned to the internal accounting control system are playing a positive role in providing high-quality information to the market. In this study, focusing on the fact that the speed at which corporate information is reflected in the stock price is very important for the stakeholders in the capital market, we find that having a certified public accountant in the internal accounting control system alleviates the stock price delay phenomenon.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2020

This paper investigates how economic freedom affected firm investment in Vietnam. In the globalization decade, economic freedom has been an important policy to support economic development in Vietnam. Improvements in economic freedom, such as capital freedom and domestic credit freedom, allow firms to access external finance more easily, so that the firm's investment depends less on internal cash flow. In a developing country, on the drawbacks, many small and medium firms likely have more challenges if the government would not give any subsidies. The higher level of freedom may exacerbate the financing constraints of less competitive firms. We analyze unique firm-level data from 2006 to 2016, which includes listed firms on two major stock exchanges and unlisted firms in the Unlisted Public Company Market. The article also considers how economic freedom affects small firms and large firms differently. Our results show that capital freedom and domestic credit freedom played an important role in investments for Vietnamese firms. However, we cannot find evidence that overall economic freedom relaxed the financial constraints on firms. Additionally, we suggest that small firms likely gain more advantage in access to external finance than do larger firms when the government removes restrictions from capital movement and the domestic credit market.