• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제52권3호
• /
• pp.39-55
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this paper is to confirm the trend of inland water fish farming in North Korea and to suggest a plan for inter-Korean cooperation. North Korea's inland water fish farming laid the foundation for production in the 1950s and 1960s, and production facilities were expanded until 1980. In the midst of the severe economic crisis in the 1990s, North Korea paid attention to inland water fish farming as an alternative to food production. The military took the lead in expanding the aquaculture industry and catfish farming was encouraged. In the Kim Jong-un era, North Korea's inland fish farming continues the tradition of catfish farming and promotes a policy of expanding inland cage farming. This study comprehensively reviewed recent inter-Korean relations, North Korea's food crisis and acceptability, and UN sanctions. As a result, inland water fish farming is the most promising field for inter-Korean cooperation in the field of fisheries. In the initial stage of inter-Korean cooperation in the field of inland water fish farming, humanitarian aid projects such as feed and seed support can be promoted. In the stage of expanding inter-Korean cooperation, knowledge sharing program and materials and facilities support projects can be promoted. Development cooperation and direct private investment are possible at the full-scale stage.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제50권4호
• /
• pp.11-28
• /
• 2019

In this study, the Inter-Korea Fisheries Cooperation Project was divided into four categories: North Korea's Fisheries Infrastructure Development Project, Fisheries Cooperation Project, Human Exchange Project, and North Korea Fisheries Investment Project. First, North Korea's fisheries infrastructure development projects include North Korea's fisheries resource research project, it's fisheries resource development project, and joint enforcement on illegal operation of Chinese ships. Second, fisheries cooperation projects include the operation of the North-South common fish area in the West Sea, the fishing project in North Korea's East sea, and the import of North Korean seafood. Third, human exchange projects include training of aquaculture technicians in North Korea, technology transfer and training of fishing vessels, and boarding of North Korea's fisherman in Korean fishing vessels. Fourth, North Korea's fisheries investment projects include aquaculture facilities and aquaculture feed support, aquatic product processing facilities and technology transfer, and fishery equipment support. However, as international sanctions are maintained in the international community to North Korea, Inter-Korea Fisheries cooperation, however, should be promoted according to the level of easing of international sanctions as international sanctions are maintained in the international community to North Korea. First, North Korea's fisheries resource research project, North Korea's fisheries resource creation project, joint enforcement on illegal operation of Chinese ships, and operation of the common fish area in the West Sea can be promoted if international sanctions are maintained at present, promote North Korea's fisheries resource research project. Second, boarding of North Korean's fisherman in Korean fishing vessels, conducting the fishing project in North Korea's East sea, and importing North Korean seafood can be aided if commercial transactions are possible with North Korea. Third, South Korea will support aquaculture facilities and aquatic feed, fisheries processing facilities and technology transfer, fishery equipment support, training of fisheries and aquaculture technicians, fishery fishing technology transfer, and training of fisherman when a comprehensive economic cooperation project is possible with North Korea.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.206-218
• /
• 2003

In spite of the importance of a fishing industry, neither any terminology defined in details nor academic systems to educate the workers in the fishery were established in the fisheries social education. The fisheries social education was considered to be the practical area around the actual fields. Therefore, on-site education was very important. Accordingly, this study collected and analyzed theoretical basis of a social education and data on the rural adult education and examined the actual status of the fishing industry in Korea and fisheries extension services enterprise and fisheries developmental enterprise corresponding to the actual fisheries social education conducted in Korea. On the basis of these frames, this study summarized the direction for the progress of fisheries social education that has not been studied until now for the purpose of suggesting the future directions of the fisheries social education as follows; The recognition on the importance of fisheries social education and fundamental researches in the fisheries social education should be extended. The practical development of fisheries social education should be realized. Fisheries extension services enterprise should be evolved by fishermen. The abilities of instructors in the fisheries social education should be improved. The academic factors in the fisheries social education should be emphasized. Inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary approaches should be adopted. Various programs should be developed for the progress of the fisheries social education. The exclusive department in charge of the fisheries social education should be established. The information system for the fisheries social education should be secured. The industry, academic organizations and the organs should make cooperation. The fisheries social education should be provided by general social education institutions for the progress. The fisheries development should be deployed on the basis of environmental preservation. It is necessary to deploy the new fishing village movement like the Saemaul movement to the fisheries. The administrative and financial supports for the fisheries social education should be expanded. It is essential to cultivate the future fishermen for the international competitiveness.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.662-671
• /
• 2015

위험 유해물질(HNS)의 종류와 물동량이 증가함에 따라 육 해상에서 HNS 유출사고가 크게 증가하고 있으며 그에 따른 화재, 폭발, 독성 피해 등 다양한 유형의 사고와 피해가 나타나고 있어, HNS 유출사고에 대비 대응하기 위하여 전문 인력을 양성할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 HNS 유출사고에 대한 육상 및 해상의 대응 체계와 교육과정 현황을 살펴보고, 육상과 해상 간의 대응체계 및 교육과정을 비교하였다. 육상의 HNS 사고 대응체계에서는 환경부가 유해화학물질 유출사고 대응 주관기관이고 국민안전처는 화재 위험물 사고 대응 주관기관이다. 육상에서는 국민안전처, 환경부, 지자체 등이 화학재난합동방재센터를 설립하여 각종 화학재난 사고에 공동대응하고 있다. 한편 해상의 대응체계에서는 국민안전처 해양경비안전본부(KCG)가 해상 HNS 방제조치 책임기관이고 해당 지방자치단체 또는 행정기관이 해안 표착 HNS 방제조치 책임기관이다. HNS 사고 대응 지휘체계는 육상과 해상이 전반적으로 비슷하지만 해상의 특수성으로 인해 서로 약간의 차이가 있다. HNS 사고 대비 대응 교육과정을 살펴보면, 육상에서는 중앙소방학교, 화학물질안전원 교육시스템, 한국화학물질관리협회 화학물질안전교육센터, 인제대학교 방재연구센터 등에서 교육과정이 다양하게 개설되어 있는 반면에 해상에서는 해양경비안전교육원 및 해양환경교육원에서 관련 교육과정이 개설되어 있으나 비교적 단순한 편이다. 한편, 육상과 해상을 연결하는 항만에서 종사하는 위험화물취급자에 대한 교육과정은 한국해사위험물검사원 교육센터, 한국항만연수원 및 한국해양수산연수원에서 개설되어 있다. 육상 교육과정과 해상 교육과정을 비교한 결과, 향후 해상 교육과정의 개선을 위해서는 현재의 예방 대응과정에 추가하여 사후관리과정을 개설하고 단일화된 HNS 방제과정을 2개의 과정(실무자 과정과 관리자 과정)으로 분리하고 각각의 보수과정을 개설할 필요가 있다. 또한 교육대상자를 민간 방제인력과 예비인력으로 확대, 온라인 강의(사이버 과정) 개설, 그리고 타 교육훈련기관과의 공동과정 개설 등 교류 협력의 활성화가 필요하다.