• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.1116-1122
• /
• 2012

본 논문에서는 연구개발비와 광고선전비를 포함한 재량적 비용의 지출이 매출과 선형 관계를 유지한다는 선행연구의 결과를 항공 운송업과 관련 제조업에 속한 기업의 기업 보고서를 통해 실증 분석한다. 제품의 주기가 짧은 비내구성 제품제조업에 속한 국내 기업의 경우에도 관리비와 판매비 항목 중 특히 연구개발비는 매출과 일차적 선형 관계를 유지하고 있다. 그러나 항공관련 산업의 경우에는 일반 관리비와 판매비 항목이 매출액과 비례하지만 무형자산성 지출인 연구개발비와 광고 선전비 항목은 비내구성 제품제조업의 경우에 비해 일차 회귀식의 조정계수가 낮은 특성을 보인다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.153-167
• /
• 2020

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine whether social value-related expenditures can be recognized as intangible assets in financial statements. Design/methodology/approach - This study examined social values defined in the economic and management fields and analyzed whether the social values have the characteristics of intangible assets. For this, the general definition of social value was derived from the concept of social value covered in previous studies. Next, we reviewed the definitions and recognition requirements for intangible assets under the current accounting standards. Based on this, we tried to suggest new criteria and disclosure methods for reporting social value-related expenditures that are not currently reported in financial statements as intangible assets in the financial statements and notes. Findings - First, as a criterion for recognizing social value-related expenditure as an intangible asset, we propose a relationship between social value-related expenditure and enterprise value. Where social value-related expenditures have a statistically significant positive impact on corporate value, they are recognized as intangible assets. If social value-related expenditures have a statistically significant negative influence on business value, or the impact of social value-related expenditures on the enterprise value is not statistically significant, it is not recognized as asset. Second, new disclosure plans are proposed according to the combination of intangible assets by category and the relevance of enterprise value. After dividing social value-related expenditures into separate intangible asset categories, if social value-related expenditures have a statistically significant positive impact on corporate value, they are recognized as intangible assets in the financial statements. If expenditures have a statistically significant negative impact on business value, they should be recorded as essential notes. Finally, if the impact of social value-related expenditure on corporate value is not statistically significant, it should be listed as a supplement. Research implications or Originality - This study contributes to the concurrent research in that it is a priori study on whether social value-related expenditure can be recognized as an asset. This study suggests that the economic effect of social expenditure can be recognized in corporate financial statements, thereby providing companies with justification and effectiveness of social value-related expenditure.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2010

The importance of intangible assets have increased unprecedentedly with the advent of the knowledge-based society. Investment in R&D has contributed to the rise of productivity and firm-value in the capital markets. but it is very difficult to determine the economic benefits of R&D investment, due to elusive link between time requirements and the realization of firm value from R&D investment. This study examines the differential effects of R&D expenditure and patents on firm-value by industry. Patents are intangible, proprietary rights that develops new products, plays a crucial role in market competition and results in research and development activities. If firms get patents, their R&D expenditure is assumed to be successful. The study analyzes whether successful R&D expenditure has a significant effect on the firm-value. The study considers two industries : high-tech industries and low-tech industries. These industries are expected to have different effect on R&D expenditure and firm-vale. The results of the study indicate that the successful R&D expenditure increased the firm-value. Successful R&D expenditure in high-tech industries more increased the firm-value more than that in low-tech industries.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.291-311
• /
• 2009

기업의 지식재산 투자와 관리 역량은 기업경쟁력 강화를 통해서 기업가치와 무형자산가치를 창출할 수 있는 핵심 요인이다. 본 연구의 목적은 지식재산 투자와 관리 역량과 연관된 주요 변수들이 무형자산가치 범주를 구분하는데 미치는 형향을 통계적으로 검정하는 것이다. 지식재산 관리 실태조사 결과 특허관리 역량은 전반적으로 충분하지 못한 것으로 나타났고, 디자인 관리 및 브랜드 관리 역량은 미흡한 것으로 나타났다. 다변량 분산분석 결과 무형자산가치 범주간 지식재산 투자와 관리 변수의 평균차이가 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 다항로짓 판별분석 결과 연구개발비 비율과 특허관리 역량이 무형자산가치 범주를 판별하는데 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 광고선전비 비율은 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는것으로 나타났다. 디자인 및 브랜드 관리 역량은 범주간 다른 유의수준을 보이고있다. 결론적으로 무형자산가치 창출을 위해서 기업의 지식재산 투자와 더불어 지식재산 관리 역량 개선을 위한 전략적 정책이 절실히 요구된다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제20권11호
• /
• pp.487-493
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 제약기업대상 연구개발비 무형자산비중을 살펴보고, 무형자산화 비중이 기업 가치에 영향을 미치는지 코스닥제약기업 중심으로 살펴보았다. 연구대상은 2011년부터 2017년까지 코스닥에 상장된 연도별, 기업별 연구개발비 회계자료가 있는 제약기업 39개를 표본으로 종속변수로 토빈Q, 독립변수로 연구개발비 무형자산화 비중으로 설계하여 패널데이터모형으로 분석하였다. 결론은 코스닥제약기업은 연구개발비 무형자산화 비중이 토빈Q(기업가치)에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 연구개발비 무형자산비중이 클수록 코스닥 제약기업에서는 기업가치가 낮아질 수 있다는 시사점을 제공한다. 즉, 코스닥 제약기업에서는 부채비율이 높을수록 투자규모를 늘리는 현상을 반영하기에 무형자산 비중이 커진다고 해서 기업가치가 증가하지 않는다는 것으로 설명할 수 있다. 본 연구는 기존 연구들은 연구개발비 총액을 기업 가치와 관련성을 규명한 연구들이 대부분인 반면, 연구개발비를 좀 더 세분화해서 '무형자산화 비중'만을 놓고, 코스닥 제약기업의 기업 가치에 영향을 미치는지 여부를 연구했다는 데 그 의의가 있다.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.153-164
• /
• 2014

R&D는 산업과 제품의 특성에 따라 그 중요도가 다르며, 제품의 고부가가치를 중요시하는 첨단산업에 있어서 R&D의 중요성이 크다. 그런데 첨단산업의 기업은 전통적인 상장기업에 비해 재무변수의 기업가치 설명력이 상대적으로 낮게 나타나는데 그 원인은 재무제표에 기록되지 않은 무형자산 때문인 것으로 추정된다. 이에 본 연구의 목적은 코스닥기업을 첨단산업과 비첨단산업으로 나누어 무형자산성 지출의 가치관련성을 분석하는 것이다. 무형자산성 지출은 연구개발비, 교육훈련비, 광고선전비로 측정하였다. 분석 결과 첫째, 첨단산업에서는 연구개발비가 기업가치에 양(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고 교육훈련비는 기업가치에 음(-)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 비첨단산업에 있어서는 교육훈련비가 기업가치에 양(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 첨단산업과 비첨단산업 모두 광고선전비는 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 대형회계법인의 감사품질은 첨단산업의 연구개발비의 가치관련성을 더욱 증가시키고 비첨단산업의 교육훈련비의 가치관련성을 증가시키는 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 투자자들이 전자, 통신, 제약, 정밀기계와 같은 첨단산업군의 연구개발비 투자에 대해 비첨단산업군의 연구개발비 투자와 비교해서 더 가치 있는 투자로 평가하는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 본 연구의 연구결과는 첨단산업과 비첨단산업의 경영자의 무형자산성 투자의 의사결정에 있어서 유익한 참고가 될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.413-439
• /
• 2009

This study conducts a survey and test to understand U.S. public's perception about multifunctionality. The questionnaire suggests seven alternative way of providing questions about intangible benefits provided by agriculture in the U.S. The final questionnaire was administered as an e-mail survey in June 2008 to a nationally representative household panel maintained in the U.S. by the Ipsos Observer. Data analysis shows that 64 percent of respondents considered the multifunctionality of agriculiture as an important issue and 45 percent of respondents were in favor of increasing government expenditure to support farmland preservation. Using Fishbein's multi-attribute model as a theoretical background, this paper develops an empirical model to assess and attributes of multifunctionality. For the analysis, bivariate orderd probit model was set up to reflect respondent's attitude. Regression analyses show that two questions (how much you agree with agriculture's intangible benefit and increasing government expenditure to support agriculture) are shaped by different sets of facts.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.153-158
• /
• 2018

At the Bank of Korea, capital stock statistics were created by the PIM (perpetual inventory method) with fixed capital formation data. Asset classifications also included 2 categories in residential buildings, 4 non-residential buildings, 14 constructions, 9 transportation equipment, 28 machinery, and 2 intangible fixed assets. It is the Korean government accounting system which is developed much with the field of the national accounts including the valuation, but until 2008 it was consistent with single-entry bookkeeping. Many countries, including Korea, were single-entry bookkeeping, not double-entry bookkeeping which can be aggregated by government accounting standard account. There was no distinction in journaling between revenue and capital expenditure when it was consistent with single-entry bookkeeping. For example, we would like to appropriately divide the past budget accounts and the settlement accounts data that have been spent on dredging into capital expenditure and revenue expenditure. It, then, tries to add the capital expenditure calculated to FCF (fixed capital formation), because revenue expenditure is cost for maintenance etc. This could be a new direction, especially, in the estimation of capital stock by the perpetual inventory method for infrastructure (SOC, social overhead capital). It should also be noted that there are differences not only between capital and income expenditure but also by other factors. How long will this difference be covered by the difference between the 'new series' and 'old series' methodologies? In addition, there is no large difference between two series by the major asset classification level. If this is treated as a round-off error, this is a problem.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between intangible asset items and company value by empirical research in the medical industry, which may enhance usefulness of the results of other empirical research on intangible asset and company value. In order to attain the purpose of this study, the stock price is taken as the independent variable and all of intangible asset items reported to a balance sheet except the development expenditures and other development expenditures, and advertisement expenses, ordinary research & development expenditures reported on the income statement are taken as the dependent variables. In the following, I carried out four meaningful results from the analysis. First, research hypothesis 1; Book value of intangible asset reported in balance sheet bears positive relationship with company value shows that development expenditures 1 variable gives positive association in a significant level while a group of \10,000-above-company shows no relationship with company value, the other group of below-\10,000-company supports a consistently significant association. All this considering, we have to keep in mind that lack of prudence may leads to wrong results when we try to analyze. Second, research hypothesis 2; Intangible asset and other intangible asset expenditures reported on the income statement gives positive effect on company value shows that R&D accounts variables give insignificance in a statistical level to all company, including entire group, \10,000-above and below consistently. These results testify that current accounting system is valid. Third, in the case of other intangible asset, it requires further examination of current KAS because statistical results show negatively significant value or insignificant value in a statistical level. That means the more intangible assets, the less company value or nothing. Last, in the case of advertisement expenditure variables of above-\10,000 and entire company shows insignificances in a statistical level consistently while below-\10,000-company shows significant result coherently. We should regard accounting information on the advertisement expenditures of \10,000-below-company with caution. The results of this study provide controversial points whether intangible asset items reported on B/S, excluding development expenditures, should be regarded as asset. To facilitate the utility of accounting information on intangible asset, it seems necessary to regard advertisement expenditures reported on I/S as asset accounts. There are further arguments on the way of dealing with intangible asset under KAS that might be considered.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.59-71
• /
• 2011

This study intends to examine the effect of research and development (R&D) expenditure effects on firm value through patent and earing persistence. The patent is the representative intangible asset which objectively indicates a typical product of research and development activities to external parties. If a firm has acquired the patent, it receives amicable evaluation from the market compared to the firm which has not acquired patent. Empirical analysis is performed for non-banking firms (1,860 firm-years) listed on Korean Stock Exchange with December fiscal year-end over 2004-2009. Research results are as follows. First, the multiple pricing of patent acquiring firm and earing persistence increased group showed that they have higher prices than the other groups. Second, the multiple pricing of R&D expenditures of earing persistence increased group showed that they have higher prices than the other group. Third, the R&D expenditures of earing persistence increased group is receiving more friendly evaluation from the stock market than the other group.