• Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.317-327
• /
• 2008

This study developed the methodology to calculate the total daily maximum load (TMDL) using the instreamflow requirement because the previous TMDLs were too simple to easily achieve. Instreamflow requirement which was the average low flow ($Q_{275}$) in the previous planning cannot consider the seasonal variation of streamflow. Therefore, this study used the instreamflow requirement which is a maximum value among hydrologic drought flow ($Q_{355}$), and environmental flows for ecology and scenery. The environmental flows for ecology were calculated using Physical HABitat SIMulation system (PHABSIM) which can estimate the necessary flow for fish survival by life cycle. Using the proposed method, all monthly TMDLs of streams in the Anyangcheon were calculated for the application.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.39 no.8 s.169
• /
• pp.703-716
• /
• 2006

The flow duration curves in the present and the ideal hydrologic cycle were derived using SWAT model. The present situation is the landuse and the groundwater withdrawal in the year of 2000 and the ideal situation is the landuse of 1975 and no groundwater withdrawal. These results were compared with the previous instream flow requirements which are the larger flow between the average drought flow and environmental control flow. As a result, the present and ideal drought flows of Ojeoncheon, Hakuicheon, Samseongcheon, and Sammakcheon, were the same and the drought flows of Samseongcheon and Sammakcheon were even zero since the baseflow is very little due to the small and mountainous watersheds. The previous instream flow requirement for the riverine function is also larger than the low flow of the ideal hydrologic cycle. The present method to set the instream flow requirement is not proper for the small mountainous watershed since it can be usually overestimated and drive the artificial measures to secure the streamflow Therefore, another method should be developed such as the low flow and the average flow between the drought flow and the low flow of the ideal hydrologic cycle using the proper hydrologic simulation model such as SWAT which can consider the landuse.

• Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.259-269
• /
• 2013

This study aims to show the feasibility of wastewater reuse through hydrological analysis and propose a framework for planning using multi-criteria decision making technique. Ten alternatives of wastewater reuse (BOD: 3.0 mg/L & 4.7 mg/L) and two references in the urban watershed were considered and analyzed by using Hydrological Simulation Program in Fortran (HSPF). Though wastewater reuse has a positive effect on water quantity, it may degrade the water quality due to the high discharge concentration. This study showed that wastewater reuse can be a great alternative for the rehabilitation of distorted water cycle, if the quality is improved up to the natural streamflow and the quantity is increased up to the instreamflow requirement. In addition, to determine the project priority, three criteria were compared: 1) impacts on water quantity and water quality, respectively, 2) consideration of present hydrologic vulnerabilities on water quantity and quality and not, and 3) social and economic considerations and not. From the performance values to all criteria, the specific ranking can be derived and the feasibility of each wastewater reuse project can be checked with the comparison of the existing facilities. As a result, DJ and DR were derived to become effective in any evaluation conditions while SS and WG were improper alternatives if various criteria were considered. The decision making for project prioritization must be careful with the consideration of various impacts of wastewater reuse because the evaluation of wastewater reuse alternative showed very different priorities for each criteria.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2018.05a
• /
• pp.416-416
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 과거자료와 기후변화 시나리오의 강수자료를 고려하여 유역 간 도수 사업의 용수공급량을 효과적으로 결정하는 방안을 제안하였다. 1985년 1월 ~ 2017년 6월까지 과거자료와 2011년부터 2100년까지의 RCP(Representative Concentration Pathway) 4.5 및 8.5 시나리오에 대해 각각 적용하였다. 청미천의 유량은 SWAT 모형을 이용하였는데 SUFI-2 알고리즘을 이용하여 최적 매개변수를 산정하였다. 본 연구는 도시 농촌 복합유역인 청미천 유역을 대상으로 하였으며 국토교통부가 고시한 원부교 지점의 하천 유지유량($0.96m^3/s$)의 연간 불만족일수를 분석하였다. 청미천 유역을 대상으로 현재 설치하고 있는 약 $30,000m^3$/일 규모의 용수 공급시설의 적용에 따른 불만족일수에 대하여 과거 강우자료를 이용하여 분석한 결과, 시설 적용 전 불만족 일수는 평균 54.94일/년이었고 적용 후에는 불만족일수가 평균 45.33일/년으로 10.61일/년이 감소하였다. 미래 기후변화 시나리오에 대해 분석하면 적용 전의 RCP 4.5의 평균 불만족일수는 65.99일/년이며 적용 후에는 11.82일/년이 감소한 54.17일/년으로 나타났다. RCP 8.5에서는 평균 불만족일수는 49.16일/년에서 39.16/년일 으로 10.0일/년이 감소하였다. 즉 현재 사업규모로는 하천유지유량 만족일수가 여전히 큰 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기후변화 시나리오를 고려하여 최소최대후회도 접근법을 토대로 효과적인 유지 용수공급량을 결정하는 방법을 적용하였다. 단위 용수공급량이 증가할 때마다 늘어나는 불만족일수 감소량에 대해 연도별로 다른 값 중에 최댓값과의 차이를 후회도로 정의하고 용수공급량 별로 최대 후회도를 산정하였다. 이 중 최솟값을 나타내는 용량을 선택한 결과 RCP4.5는 $110,000m^3$/일, RCP8.5는 $90,000m^3$/일로 도출되었다.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.39 no.11 s.172
• /
• pp.935-946
• /
• 2006

This study proposed a new procedure of sustainable water resources planning to prevent the urban streamflow depletion, based on the Heathcote's study in 1998: (1) to understand the watershed component and processes, (2) to identify and quantify problems within the watershed, (3) to set clear and specific goals, (4) to develop a list of management options, (5) to eliminate infeasible options, (6) to test the effectiveness of remaining feasible options, and (7) to develop the final options. PSR(Presure-State-Response) concept was used for the determination of indicators of PSD(Potential Streamflow Depletion; step 2) and effect equation (step 7) and composite programming for the calculation of PSD. The instreamflow requirement was proposed as clear and specific goal (step 3) and was determined by the larger of the PHABSIM's environmental flow and the drought flow. A continuous rainfall-runoff model is necessary to test the effectiveness of alternatives. It should estimate not only the exact runoff but also the effect of landuse change, reservoir, infiltration facility and so on like SWAT(Soil and Water Assessment Tool). The proposed procedure will be applied on the corresponding paper.