• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제49권6호
• /
• pp.884-896
• /
• 2014

연구에서는 지역혁신역량의 주요 요인을 추출하고, 이러한 요인들이 지역경제의 활성화를 반영하는 지표들에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 확인하였다. 요인분석결과, 지역혁신역량의 요인은 혁신자원/투입요인(제1요인), 혁신환경/인프라요인(제2요인), 협력/연계요인(제3요인)으로 구분되었다. 3개 요인들의 요인점수와 지역 경제 활성화에 관한 지표(신설법인, 취업자 수)를 이용하여 패널 모형을 구축한 결과, 혁신역량 요인들은 모두 양(+)의 유의미한 값을 보였다. 또한 해당 지역경제 활성화에 대한 지표들은 혁신투입요인, 협력요인, 혁신인프라요인 순으로 영향을 받음을 알 수 있었다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.109-113
• /
• 2023

An educational outcome cohort has been established at Keimyung University School of Medicine to help make educational policy decisions and improve educational programs based on data. The purpose of the educational outcome cohort is to support educational policy decisions for achieving graduation outcomes smoothly and to accomplish the intended human resources development of the university through objective analyses and regular monitoring, providing continuous feedback. The data collected for the educational outcome cohort include the student identifications of freshmen, entrance exam scores, premedical and medical school grades, titles and forms of student academic research, the results of psychological testing, scholarship recipient lists, volunteer clubs, and so forth. The data are collected using an information utilization agreement approved by the Institutional Review Board, and the collected data are encrypted and stored on a dedicated computer for enhanced personal information security. Proposals to access and utilize the educational outcome cohort data must be discussed and approved by the Educational Outcome Cohort Committee, which decides on the scope and method of utilization. The collected and managed educational outcome cohort data have been used to develop comparative programs to improve students' competency and to support admission policy decisions through an analysis of the characteristics and performance of medical school students. The establishment and utilization of the educational outcome cohort will play an important role in determining the School of Medicine's educational policies and suggesting new directions for educational policies in the future.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.21-43
• /
• 2024

This paper provides a new theoretical rationale for public procurement for innovation (PPI), a unique policy encouraging public procurers to purchase innovative products. In contrast to existing studies that primarily emphasize the advantages of PPI, this paper takes a comprehensive approach, examining both the costs and risks associated with PPI, alongside its benefits. It finds a general condition under which PPI outperforms traditional public procurement. Under this condition, this paper demonstrates that PPI enhances social welfare by facilitating optimal risk-sharing between public procurers and the general economy. Additionally, it draws policy implications from a comparative analysis between the current PPI policy in Korea and an optimal PPI policy.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.157-169
• /
• 2012

China's Space Activities in 2011 (thereafter 2011 White Paper) was published by Information Office of State Council of the Peoples Republic of China on December 29, 2011, and it was the third space white paper after 2000's space white paper and 2006's space white paper. The 2011 White Paper summarizes splendid achievements China had received in space area since 2006, and systematically introduces the principles of China's space activities; at the same time, it also presents the world the policies, measures and key areas of China's space activities in the following five years. This 2011 White Paper is the most detailed, concrete, and integrated elaboration of China's space policy, and it will be the guideline for China to explore outer space with peaceful purpose in the next five years. Compared with 2000's and 2006's White Papers, the 2011 White Paper indicated that Chinese government adjusted space policies under the new circumstance. The 2011 white paper stressed China's position on use of outer space for peaceful purpose and highlighted the new idea of scientific and innovative development in space industry in the next five years.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.396-416
• /
• 2019

The key conditions for the promotion of innovative technology-based start-ups are expanding the market for innovative technology products and services, increasing equity-based funding opportunities, promoting the commercialization of technological innovation, and establishing a fair-trade system for start-ups to compete fairly in the market. Besides, there is a need for a support system that minimizes the cost of failure in case of business failure to facilitate re-challenge and provides education and training opportunities to enhance entrepreneurial capabilities. To activate technology-based start-ups, the Korean government introduced the TIPS policy in 2013. It is a program that creates technology start-up with private investment led by successful venture entrepreneurs, which has shown remarkable achievement and is regarded as the most successful policy in this field up to now. The most critical factor contributed to the success of this program is to invite private investors to select a technology entrepreneurship team and provide mentoring with the investment. The government provides R&D funding with matching investment, commercialization and marketing support to ensure that technology start-ups survive crossing the death-valley. Subsequent investments from domestic and abroad investors are actively made and it is becoming a representative technology-based start-up program in Korea.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.330-340
• /
• 2011

This research aims at conducting a comparative study on the relative efficiency of technologically innovative activities between manufacturing and service industries using data envelopment analysis (DEA). First, as an individual approach, efficiency of technologically innovative activities between manufacturing and service industries is separately evaluated. The results show that efficiency of both industries is similarly low, but patterns of technologically innovative activities differ from each other. Manufacturing industries usually do innovation focusing on various outputs with a single input, whereas service industries tend to do innovation emphasizing on a single output with mixed inputs. Second, as a holistic approach to both industries, efficiency is collectively assessed. The analysis demonstrates that efficiency of service industries is higher than that of manufacturing industries, and there are similar patterns of technologically innovative activities between both manufacturing and service industries. This study provides industrial managers with policy implications based on similarities and differences between manufacturing and service industries.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2006년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.167-175
• /
• 2006

This paper aimed to exam core factors of the success factors of new products and analyze their effects on success. To accomplish this purpose, this study examined previous studies and summarized core factors of success factors of new products. From previous studies, we drawed core factor Core factor is technology factors(marketing skills, technical skills), specific of new product(more innovative, less innovative, cost advantage, competitive advantage), the process of product development(crossfunctional integralion, staff involvement). Except for more innovative factors, the others factors affect on success To be winner , companies must be consider these key factor( less innovative, cost advantage, competitive, advantage, cross-functionalintegration, staff involvement)

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.27-39
• /
• 2006

This paper aimed to exam core factors of the success factors of new products and analyze their effects on success. To accomplish this purpose, this study examined previous studies and summarized core factors of success factors of new products. From previous studies, we drawed core factor. Core factor is technology factors(marketing skills, technical skills), specific of new product(more innovative, less innovative, cost advantage, competitive advantage), the process of product development(crossfunctional integration, staff involvement). Except for more innovative factors, the others factors affect on success. To be winner, companies must be consider these key factor(less innovative, cost advantage, competitive advantage, cross-functionalintegration, staff involvement).

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권10호
• /
• pp.37-45
• /
• 2014

Purpose - This study aims to analyze the relationship between trends in innovative EU industries and market distribution in smaller emerging markets under an open economy. Research design, data, and methodology - Although innovation was well-distributed, due to socio-economic factors following European integration, CEE had not achieved sustainable economic growth. However, this paper analyzes the differences among changes in CEE innovation for smaller emerging markets dominated since 2000. Market distribution has facilitated new markets for innovative industries, according to EU surveys and economic indicators. Results - The dominance of the local industrial market distribution has deterred innovation investment the survey shows that innovation investment has been shrinking, despite the EU's open innovation policy for CEE employment and R&D. For the CEE case, there were expectation gaps and uncertainty about whether to use the new distribution dominance or TNCs' innovation in smaller emerging countries without local industrial innovation. Conclusions - Innovation generates market growth and distribution power however, small growth requires stimulation, and creativity and innovative edge need further focus in local public and corporate strategy.

• 동아시아경상학회지
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 2019

Purpose - This paper aims to analyze the difference of technological innovative pattern by industry. Research design and methodology - we try to identify the major factors which can exert an effective influence on actual innovation output, utilizing the result of Korean Innovation Survey. By doing so, this work can make a comparison with Pavitt (1984) and succeeding discussion on sectoral pattern of innovation Results - Analysis on major industry in Korea shows that there are substantial differences in terms of the source of innovation, organization-related factor, and appropriation mechanism among each industry, and differential strategy to be proper for the nature of each industry is needed. There is some variation within industries which deemed as same type of sector defined by Pavitt. Conclusions - This analysis call for elaborate analysis on sectoral pattern of innovation, considering the change and difference of innovative environment as well as differential business strategy and way to do innovate, which is proper considering the nature of innovative pattern in each industry for successful technological innovation in Korea. At the same time, proper policy measure considering the differential pattern of technological innovation is needed.