• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.53-70
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the perceived needs of the married women for financial management education and (2) to identify individual and family variables that influence needs on each content of financial management education. Data were collected from questionaires with 603 married women who were residents of jeonju. The major findings were as follows; (1) The level of financial management education needs were high. (2) The priority order on each content perceived by the married women was 'saving' 'insurance' 'housing' 'tax' 'expenditure planning' and 'debt management & credit' (3) The needs on contents area of the married women group classified by characteristics were significant according to age education level job family life cycle monthly family income asset and financial need variables.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.106-117
• /
• 1999

A study was conducted to identify the perceptions about health education competence and satisfaction of nursing profession, and the relationship between health education competency and satisfaction of nursing profession in nursing students. The subjects were 118 nursing students who were third year at a diploma course. The results of this study are as follows : 1) In domain of health education process, the highest level of competency was the need assessment of the individual health education(mean : 3.62) and the lowest level of competency was the evaluation of heath education program(mean : 2.93. 2) In domain of health education method, the level of competency was estimated ordered as counselling and interview (mean : 3.53), health campaign(mean : 3.42), demonstration(mean : 3.30), role play (mean : 3.28), group discussion (mean : 3.25), lecture(mean : 3.10). 3) In domain of health education place, the level of competency was estimated ordered as of patient education while giving individually care(mean : 3.68), at home(mean : 3.67), in the classrom(mean : 3.67), in the community(mean : 3.35), while teaching with group patients at hosital(mean : 3.30). 4) In domain of activities of health educator, the level of competency was ordered as collaborator(mean : 3.59), coordinator(mean : 3.31), material developer(mean 3.14), program evaluator(mean : 3.13), program designer(mean 3.10). 5) Health education competency was found to be significantly related to satisfaction of professional nursing.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.155-178
• /
• 2010

Assessment of information credibility is a ubiquitous human activity given that people constantly make decisions and selections based on the value of information in a variety of information seeking and use contexts. Today, people are increasingly engaging in diverse online activities beyond searching for and reading information, including activities such as creating, tagging and rating content, shopping, and listening to and watching multimedia content. The Web 2.0 environment presents new challenges for people because the burden of information evaluation is shifted from professional gatekeepers to individual information consumers. At the same time, however, it also provides unprecedented opportunities for people to use tools and features that help them to make informed credibility judgments by relying on other people's ratings and recommendations. This paper introduces fundamental notions and dimensions of credibility, and contends that credibility assessment can be best understood with respect to human information behavior because it encompasses both the level of effort people exert as well as the heuristics they employ to evaluate information. The paper reports on a survey study investigating people's credibility judgments with respect to online information, focusing on the constructs, heuristics, and interactions involved in people's credibility assessment processes within the context of their everyday life information activities. Using an online activity diary method, empirical data about people's online activities and their associated credibility assessments were collected at multiple points throughout the day for three days. The results indicate that distinct credibility assessment heuristics are emerging as people engage in diverse online activities involving more user-generated and multimedia content. A heuristic approach suggests that people apply mental shortcuts or rules of thumb in order to minimize the amount of cognitive effort and time required to make credibility judgments. The paper discusses why a heuristic approach is key to reaching a more comprehensive understanding of people's credibility assessments within the information-abundant online environment.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.49-58
• /
• 2013

본 논문에서는 선행연구자료 분석을 통해 사이버대학의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인을 도출하고자 하였다. 그동안의 연구는 사이버대학의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인을 대학중심으로만 파악하고자 하였으나, 대학 외에 국가, 사회적, 개인적 요인들도 중요한 변인이며, 상호 유기적이고 시스템적으로 묶여 작용하고 있었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 시스템적 구조하에서 투입요인이 중요하며, 그 요인에는 양질의 교육을 제공하기 위해 갖추어야 하는 기본적인 교육여건(교사 교직원 시스템)과 관련규정, 관리시스템, 학생의 학습참여 의욕 및 동기, 정부의 사이버대학에 대한 인식 및 정책적 지원, 사회적인 인식 또는 평가가질에 영향을 미치는 요인임을 제시하였다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.475-487
• /
• 2000

As a result of carrying out t-test against the learning activity that used the learning materials designed by level, significant disparity was found. Thus, it was found that hte effect of this learning activity became more visible with lapse of time. But the major cause by which there appeared small significant disparity as a result of testing is that the units of experiment were limited and that the period of using the learning materials was not long. In an analysis on the results of interest test, the experimental class also appeared to show the average score that was higher than that of the comparative class by 0.10 after converting a decimal point. The outcome of attitude test was that the experimental class showed a higher average score by 0.11, as a result of converting a decimal point, than that of the comparative class. So, a large number of students showed an improved reaction. But, there seemed some problems of the learning materials or the method of progressing the activity in changing under achievement students or students who avoided studying math. When the effect of the level-based learning activity was investigated, more than 80% of the experimental class’s students showed a positive reaction. Thus, it could be judged that students, who felt some burden at studying math, might be served more largely, not by teacher’s uniform instruction, but by an individual learning using the level-based learning materials that enabled them to do a systematic self-learning for themselves.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.37-66
• /
• 2023

Scientometrics and research evaluation describe and analyze research publications when conducting publication, citation, and topic analyses. However, what exactly is a (scientific, academic, scholarly or research) publication? This article demonstrates that there are many problems when it comes to looking in detail at quantitative publication analyses, citation analyses, altmetric analyses, and topic analyses. When is a document a publication and when is it not? We discuss authorship and contribution, formally and informally published documents, as well as documents in between (preprints, research data) and the characteristics of references, citations, and topics. What is a research publication? Is there a commonly accepted criterion for distinguishing between research and non-research? How complete and unbiased are data sources for research publications and sources for altmetrics? What is one research publication? What is the unit of a publication that causes us to count it as "1?" In this regard, we report problems related to multi-author publications and their counting, weighted document types, the unit and weighting of citations and references, the unit of topics, and counting problems-not only at the article and individual researcher level (micro-level), but also at the meso-level (e.g., institutions) and macro-level (e.g., countries). Our results suggest that scientometric counting units are not reliable and clear. Many scientometric and research evaluation studies must therefore be used with the utmost caution.

• Nutrition Research and Practice
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.319-327
• /
• 2015

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In nutritional epidemiology, collecting self-reported respondent height and weight is a simpler procedure of data collection than taking measurements. The aim of this study was to compare self-reported and measured height and weight and to evaluate the possibility of using self-reported estimates in the assessment of nutritional status of elderly Poles aged 65 + years. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The research was carried out in elderly Poles aged 65 + years. Respondents were chosen using a quota sampling. The total sample numbered 394 participants and the sub-sample involved 102 participants. Self-reported weight (non-corrected self-reported weight; non-cSrW) and height estimates (non-corrected self-reported height; non-cSrH) were collected. The measurements of weight (measured weight; mW) and height (measured height; mH) were taken. Using multiple regression equations, the corrected self-reported weight (cSrW) and height (cSrH) estimates were calculated. RESULTS: Non-cSrH was higher than mH in men on average by 2.4 cm and in women on average by 2.3 cm. In comparison to mW, non-cSrW was higher in men on average by 0.7 kg, while in women no significant difference was found (mean difference of 0.4 kg). In comparison to mBMI, non-cSrBMI was lower on average by $0.6kg/m^2$ in men and $0.7kg/m^2$ in women. No differences were observed in overweight and obesity incidence when determined by mBMI (68% and 19%, respectively), non-cSrBMI (62% and 14%, respectively), cSrBMI (70% and 22%, respectively) and pcSrBMI (67% and 18%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Since the results showed that the estimated self-reported heights, weights and BMI were accurate, the assessment of overweight and obesity incidence was accurate as well. The use of self-reported height and weight in the nutritional status assessment of elderly Poles on a population level is therefore recommended. On an individual level, the use of regression equations is recommended to correct self-reported height, particularly in women.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제33권6호
• /
• pp.144-156
• /
• 2018

Level 3 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) is performed for the risk assessment that calculates radioactive material dispersion to the environment. This risk assessment is performed with a tool of MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS2 or WinMACCS). For the off-site consequence analysis of multi-unit nuclear power plant (NPP) accident, the single location (Center Of Mass, COM) method has been usually adopted with the assumption that all the NPPs in the nuclear site are located at the same COM point. It was well known that this COM calculation can lead to underestimated or overestimated radionuclide concentration. In order to overcome this underestimation or overestimation of radionuclide concentrations in the COM method, Multiple Location (ML) method was developed in this study. The radionuclide concentrations for the individual NPPs are separately calculated, and they are summed at every location in the nuclear site by the post-processing of radionuclide concentrations that is based on two-dimensional Gaussian Plume equations. In order to demonstrate the efficiency of the ML method, radionuclide concentrations were calculated for the six-unit NPP site, radionuclide concentrations of the ML method were compared with those by COM method. This comparison was performed for conditions of constant weather, yearly weather in Korea, and four seasons, and the results were discussed. This new ML method (1) improves accuracy of radionuclide concentrations when multi-unit NPP accident occurs, (2) calculates realistic atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides under various weather conditions, and finally (3) supports off-site emergency plan optimization. It is recommended that this new method be applied to the risk assessment of multi-unit NPP accident. This new method drastically improves the accuracy of radionuclide concentrations at the locations adjacent to or very close to NPPs. This ML method has a great strength over the COM method when people live near nuclear site, since it provides accurate radionuclide concentrations or radiation doses.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제10권9호
• /
• pp.85-90
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 65세 이상 경도인지장애 7명을 대상으로 개별 보드게임프로그램 및 추척관찰을 통하여 인지기능 및 우울 수준에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였고 이를 위해 Mini-Mental State Examination Korean version(MMSE-K), Korean Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA-K) 및 Korean Gorm of Geriatric Depression Scale(KGDS)를 사용하였다. 연구결과, MMSE-K 중재 전, 후 및 추적평가에서 유의한 차이를 보였고(p<0.05) 세부항목 중 시간, 장소 및 물건 인식력과 집중력에서 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). MoCA-K는 중재 전, 후 및 추적평가에서 차이를 보였는데(p<0.01) 세부항목 중 시공간, 이름 인식력, 주의집중 및 단기기억력에서 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). KGDS을 통한 우울수준의 중재 전, 후 및 추적 비교에서 우울에 차이를 보였다(p<0.01). 따라서 65세 이상의 경도인지장애 고령자의 개별보드게임은 인지기능을 개선에 도움을 줄 수 있고 또한 고령자의 시간과 장소 인식력을 포함된 개선된 보드게임이 개발되고 적용되기 기대한다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제18권7호
• /
• pp.590-599
• /
• 2018

한정된 자원을 가진 전장 환경에서 다수의 표적을 효과적으로 제압하는 사격 계획을 수행하기 위한 기반정보로써, 표적에 대한 분석을 통해 표적의 위협도를 정량적으로 산출하여 높은 위협도를 가지는 표적에 대해 우선순위를 부여하는 과정이 필수적이다. 그러나 대지표적에 대한 위협 평가 알고리즘에 대한 연구는 아직 초기 수준에 머무르고 있다. 이를 고려하여, 본 논문에서는 다수의 대지표적을 위한 위협 평가 알고리즘을 제안한다. 제안하는 알고리즘에서는 표적 및 보호자산의 형태를 고려하여 근접도 연산을 수행한 후, 무장 및 보호 자산의 중요도에 따른 가중치를 설정하여 표적 성질을 고려한 표적의 위협도를 산출하는 것을 핵심으로 한다. 본 논문에서는 제안하는 알고리즘의 시뮬레이션 및 가시화를 통해 성능 평가 및 검증을 수행하였다. 성능 평가 결과 제안하는 알고리즘은 무장 및 보호자산의 위치가 다양한 환경에서 무장 및 보호자산의 중요도를 나타내는 가중치에 따라서 위협도 평가를 효과적으로 수행함으로써, 실제 대지 무기 체계에 적용할 시에 높은 효용성 및 효과가 기대된다.