1 |
Wilson NHF. Margaret AW, Wastell DG, Smith GA. A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative materials: five-year results. Quintessence Int. 1988: 19:675-681
|
2 |
Barnes Dlv!, Blank LW, Thompson VI', Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence lnt 1991; 22: 143-151
|
3 |
Powell LV. Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restoration. Oper Dent 1995:20:7-13
|
4 |
Fuks AB. chosack A, Eidelman E. A Two-year evaluation in vivo and in vitro of class 2 composites. Oper Dent 1990: 15:219-223
|
5 |
Bossing C, Lundqvist P. A 1 year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlay: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1991:22:153-157
|
6 |
Gladys S. Van Meerbeek B. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M. P Lambrechts. Vanherle G. Clinical and semiquantitative amrgin analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995:23:329-338
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Browning WD. Dennison JB. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations Oper Dent 1996: 21: 160-166
|
8 |
Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G Two-year clinical evaluation of two dentine-adhesive systems in cervical lesion. J Dent 1993:21: 195-202
DOI
ScienceOn
|