• 제목/요약/키워드: ISO/EC 17025

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Evaluation of Flow Measurement Uncertainty of Sonic Nozzle (소닉노즐의 유량측정 불확도 평가)

  • Choe, Hae-Man;Park, Gyeong-Am;Choe, Yong-Mun
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers B
    • /
    • v.25 no.12
    • /
    • pp.1898-1904
    • /
    • 2001
  • Measurement uncertainty should be evaluated according to ISO/IEC 17025. In Flow measurement area, uncertainty evaluation scheme was applied to the reference flow meter, sonic nozzle. Uncertainty was calculated by evaluating various uncertainty factors affected in flow measurement. The expanded uncertainty(U) of the sonic nozzle was 2.1$\times$ 10$^{-3}$ (confidence level of 95 %). This evaluation example will be useful in flow measurement uncertainty determination of other flow meters.

Quality Assurance system for Nuclear Power Plant Equipment Qualification in Korea (국내 원전기기 성능검증 품질보증체계 구축에 관한 연구)

  • 남지희;이영건;임남진
    • Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.25 no.3
    • /
    • pp.1-8
    • /
    • 2002
  • This paper investigates different QA standards such as KEPIC QAP, KEPIC END 1200, ISO/1EC 17025 etc. and as a result defines QA elements for Nuclear Power Plant equipment qualification(EQ) in Korea. This paper also proposes a practical QA certification system appropriate for an Integrated Organization for EQ which is being planned to be established in Korea. Since the level of the Korean EQ technology is comparatively low, the Korean manufacturers of the Nuclear Power Plant(NPP) equipment have usually used overseas EQ services. The EQ related organizations in Korea are making efforts to construct the integrated EQ system. In connection with this, it is required that the QA elements and QA certification system suitable for EQ in Korea be developed.

A Study on Introduction of Accreditation Program for Industrial Hygiene Laboratories in Korea (국내 작업환경측정기관 인정제도 도입을 위한 현황 조사 연구)

  • Park, Deok Mook;Park, Jeonglm;Shin, Yong Chul;Cha, Jeong Young;Jeong, Jee Yeon;Kim, Boo Wook;Paik, Nam Won
    • Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
    • /
    • v.15 no.3
    • /
    • pp.232-238
    • /
    • 2005
  • There are growing needs for improving the general performances of the domestic working environment evaluation organizations. For this purpose, introduction of laboratory accreditation program has been suggested. This study was conducted as a part of this effort. With a questionnaire developed in accordance with the ISO/IEC 17025, the current status of industrial hygiene (IH) laboratories in terms of manpower, management and technical aspects. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The average working staffs' number of the working environment evaluation organizations was $6.8{\pm}3.3$ persons. In addition, 49% of all organizations are run by less than 5 persons. This suggests that manpower of Korean IH laboratories is very limited. 2. IH laboratories surveyed in this study obtained 53% of the points by the international standard. And there is significant correlation between the number of staffing and total scores (P<0.05). 3. The period of work experience is one of the most important factors to determine the working capability. The average year of work experience of the laboratories' directors was $13.5{\pm}5.3$ years. Directors with more wok experiences obtained higher scores on the questions that ask to prove the appropriateness of the research methodology (p<0.05). 4. As for academic qualifications of laboratory directors, 14% had Ph.D., 31% with Master's, 29% with Bachelor's, and 4% had Associate degree. There was significant correlation between the total scores and the general managers' academic background (p<0.05). The 27% of laboratory directors have majored in either industrial hygiene or health, 8% majored in medicine, another 8% majored environmental studies, and 6% majored in chemistry. 5. Only 14% of all IH laboratories surveyed employ directors with Certified Industrial Hygienist licence, 41% have general managers with Certified Associate Industrial Hygienist (Level 1) licence, and 45% of all laboratories either employ directors without relevant qualification or did not respond. When the laboratory manger holds relevant qualification, laboratory health and safety management was better (p<0.05). 6. When compared to the general international standard in terms of the management, and 55% in terms of technological level.