• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.90-100
• /
• 2017

Purpose: To Study the dosimetric advantage of the Jaw tracking technique in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for Head and Neck Cancers. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected 10 previously treated head and neck cancer patients stage (T1/T2, N1, M0) in this study. All the patients were planned for IMRT and VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost technique. IMRT and VMAT plans were performed with jaw tracking (JT) and with static jaw (SJ) technique by keeping the same constraints and priorities for a particular patient. Target conformity, dose to the critical structures and low dose volumes were recorded and analyzed for IMRT and VMAT plans with and without JT for all the patients. Results: The conformity index average of all patients followed by standard deviation (${\bar{x}}{\pm}{\sigma}_{\bar{x}}$) of the JT-IMRT, SJ-IMRT, JT-VMAT, and SJ-VMAT were $1.72{\pm}0.56$, $1.67{\pm}0.57$, $1.83{\pm}0.65$, and $1.85{\pm}0.64$, and homogeneity index were $0.059{\pm}0.05$, $0.064{\pm}0.05$, $0.064{\pm}0.04$, and $0.064{\pm}0.05$. JT-IMRT shows significant mean reduction in right parotid and left parotid shows of 7.64% (p < 0.001) and 7.45% (p < 0.001) compare to SJ-IMRT. JT-IMRT plans also shows considerable dose reduction to thyroid, inferior constrictors, spinal cord and brainstem compared to the SJ-IMRT plans. Conclusion: Significant dose reductions were observed for critical structure in the JT-IMRT compared to SJ-IMRT technique. In JT-VMAT plans dose reduction to the critical structure were not significant compared to the SJ-IMRT due to relatively lesser monitor units.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.284-289
• /
• 2013

양측성 유방암 환자를 대상으로 부피적 조절회전방사선치료와 세기조절방사선치료의 선량학적 결과를 비교하여 효율적인 치료방법을 제시함을 목적으로 한다. 5명의 환자를 대상으로 8개 빔의 세기조절방사선치료와 12개 빔의 세기조절방사선치료, 1회전 부피적 조절회전방사선치료 계획을 수립하였다. 그 결과를 DVH 분석을 통해 선량학적으로 비교분석하였다. PTV의 평균선량과 $D_{98}$을 보면 12-IMRT가 $51.04{\pm}0.57$ Gy (오른쪽), $50.80{\pm}1.07$ Gy (왼쪽), $42.94{\pm}16.16$ Gy (오른쪽), $42.56{\pm}2.09$ Gy (왼쪽)로 우수한 경향을 보인다. HI와 $CI_{90,95}$에서도 12-IMRT가 우수한 결과를 보였다. 중요장기에서는 세치료계획 모두 우수한 결과를 보였지만 12-IMRT에서 가장 낮은 선량을 보였다. 12-IMRT가 PTV와 OAR의 선량학적측면에서 우수한 결과를 보여주었다.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.41-52
• /
• 2003

I. 목적 방사선 치료계획에 있어서 정상조직의 선량과 치료부위 선량의 분포는 매우 중요하다. 또한 치료부위의 균일한 선량분포를 얻기 위하여 여러 가지 방법을 이용하고 있다. 특히 두경부(Head & Neck) 종양의 방사선 치료 시 체표 윤곽의 변화가 심하여 이에 따른 선량 불균일 보정이 필요하다. 기존의 치료방법으로는 parotid gland 와 spinal cord 의 tolerance dose 이하를 유지하면서 planning target volume(PTV)에 충분한 치료 선량을 전달하기에는 여러 가지 어려움이 있다. 이에 본원에서는 Forward IMRT를 이용한 방사선 치료의 유용성 및 실용적인 정도관리 방법에 관한 연구를 하였다. II. 대상 및 방법 본 연구는 두경부(Head & Neck) 종양 비인두암(nasophrygeal cancer)의 방사선 치료가 요구되는 환자를 대상으로 하여 2차원적인 치료계획과 dynamic Mulit-Leaf Collimator(dMLC)를 이용하여 partial block technique(PBT)방법을 적용한 Forward IMRT를 위한 치료계획을 dose volume histogram(DVH)로 비교 분석하였다. 또한 정도관리(quality assurance, QA)를 위하여 필름과 pinpoint chamber를 이용하여 정확한 선량 평가를 실시하였다. III. 결과 2차원적인 치료계획과 Forward IMRT를 적용한 치료계획의 DVH를 비교 분석한 결과 Forward IMRT를 적용한 치료계획이 Rt, Lt parotid gland와 spinal cord에 들어가는 선량을 좀더 줄일 수 있었다. 이러한 Forward IMRT의 시도로 조사면의 방사선 세기가 정상조직의 보호를 개선시키고 치료의 최적화를 이룰 수 있었다. Inverse IMRT에 비해 기존의 3차원적 치료계획 장치를 이용할 수 있고 비교적 단순한 방사선 세기 패턴이므로 정도관리가 용이하였다. IV. 결론 Forward IMRT는 2차원적인 치료법에 비하여 PTV에는 균일한 선량분포를 이루면서 정상조직에는 tolerance dose 이하로 선량을 전달 할 수 있는 치료기법이었다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.249-253
• /
• 2019

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the trend in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) use in Korea from 2011 to 2018. Materials and Methods: We collected data from the Health and Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) big data based on the National Health Insurance Service claims and reimbursements records using primary treatment planning codes (HD 041) for IMRT from 2011 to 2018. We analyzed the changing patterns in clinical application to specific tumor sites and regional differences in IMRT utilization. Results: The use of IMRT has exhibited an 18-fold steep rise from 1,921 patients in 2011 to 34,759 in 2018. With regard to IMRT in 2018, 70% of patients (24,248/34,759) were treated in metropolitan areas (Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi Province). IMRT was most commonly used to treat breast, lung, and prostate cancers in 2018. Among these, the use of IMRT for breast cancer shows the most remarkable increase from 2016 when the National Health Insurance began to cover IMRT for all solid tumors. Conclusion: The use of IMRT is steadily increasing to treat cancer and is concentrated in metropolitan areas.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.313-321
• /
• 2016

Purpose: Total scalp irradiation (TSI) is a rare but challenging indication. We previously reported that non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was superior to coplanar IMRT in organ-at-risk (OAR) protection and target dose distribution. This consecutive treatment planning study compared IMRT with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and Methods: A retrospective treatment plan databank search was performed and 5 patient cases were randomly selected. Cranial imaging was restored from the initial planning computed tomography (CT) and target volumes and OAR were redelineated. For each patients, three treatment plans were calculated (coplanar/non-coplanar IMRT, VMAT; prescribed dose 50 Gy, single dose 2 Gy). Conformity, homogeneity and dose volume histograms were used for plan. Results: VMAT featured the lowest monitor units and the sharpest dose gradient (1.6 Gy/mm). Planning target volume (PTV) coverage and homogeneity was better in VMAT (coverage, 0.95; homogeneity index [HI], 0.118) compared to IMRT (coverage, 0.94; HI, 0.119) but coplanar IMRT produced the most conformal plans (conformity index [CI], 0.43). Minimum PTV dose range was 66.8%-88.4% in coplanar, 77.5%-88.2% in non-coplanar IMRT and 82.8%-90.3% in VMAT. Mean dose to the brain, brain stem, optic system (maximum dose) and lenses were 18.6, 13.2, 9.1, and 5.2 Gy for VMAT, 21.9, 13.4, 14.5, and 6.3 Gy for non-coplanar and 22.8, 16.5, 11.5, and 5.9 Gy for coplanar IMRT. Maximum optic chiasm dose was 7.7, 8.4, and 11.1 Gy (non-coplanar IMRT, VMAT, and coplanar IMRT). Conclusion: Target coverage, homogeneity and OAR protection, was slightly superior in VMAT plans which also produced the sharpest dose gradient towards healthy tissue.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.276-284
• /
• 2018

Purpose: Traditionally, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) is used for neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was later developed for more conformal dose distribution, with the potential for reduced toxicity across many disease sites. We sought to use the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine trends and predictors for IMRT use in rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: We queried the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation to standard doses followed by surgical resection. Odds ratios were used to determine predictors of IMRT use. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were used to determine potential predictors of overall survival (OS). Propensity matching was used to account for any indication bias. Results: Among 21,490 eligible patients, 3,131 were treated with IMRT. IMRT use increased from 1% in 2004 to 22% in 2014. Predictors for IMRT use included increased N stage, higher comorbidity score, more recent year, treatment at an academic facility, increased income, and higher educational level. On propensity-adjusted, multivariable analysis, male gender, increased distance to facility, higher comorbidity score, IMRT technique, government insurance, African-American race, and non-metro location were predictive of worse OS. Of note, the complete response rate at time of surgery was 28% with non-IMRT and 21% with IMRT. Conclusion: IMRT use has steadily increased in the treatment of rectal cancer, but still remains only a fraction of overall treatment technique, more often reserved for higher disease burden.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제34권
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 2022

목 적: 볼루스 적용이 어려운 코와 같은 요철 부위 치료 시 피부 선량 확보에 어려움이 있는 경우, IMRT(Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy)전달 기법 과 평균 에너지가 낮은 FFF(Flattening Filter Free)를 조합한 치료 계획으로 피부 선량 증가 여부를 팬텀 실험을 통해 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 두경부암 치료시 가장 흔하게 사용하는 6MV-FF(Flattening Filter) VMAT(Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy) 치료계획을 기준으로 정하고, VMAT와 IMRT, FF와 FFF, 5 mm 볼루스 적용 유무를 조합하여 비교군을 생성하였다. 란도 팬텀 콧등에 가상 타겟을 생성하였고, 5 mm 의 가상의 볼루스를 란도 팬텀 콧등 위에 완전 밀착을 가정하여 적용하였다. 팬텀의 코를 기준으로 5개 측정지점을 정하고 각각의 치료계획 을 치료테크닉과 bolus 적용유무에 맞게 치료계획 당 3회를 조사하여 흡수선량을 측정하였다. 결 과: FF vs FFF 에서의 피부선량 차이는 VMAT bolus off에서 FFF인 경우 증가하였고, IMRT bolus off의 경우 차이를 나타내지 않았다. VMAT bolus 5 mm, IMRT bolus 5 mm에서는 FFF에서 오히려 피부선량이 감소되는 것을 확인 할 수 있었다. VMAT vs IMRT 피부선량 차이는 FFF bolus off 의 경우에만 피부선량이 증가했고, 나머지는 통계적 차이가 없었다. bolus off vs bolus 5 mm 에서의 피부선량 차이는 IMRT FFF 을 사용했을 경우만 제외하고는 모두 bolus 5 mm 에서 피부선량이 증가하는 것을 확인하였다. IMRT와 FFF를 조합한 치료 계획은 통상적으로 사용되는 VMAT와 FF를 사용하여 5 mm 볼루스를 적용한 치료 계획 피부선량의 측정값을 분석한 결과 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 발견하지 못했다. 따라서 IMRT_FFF 를 사용함으로써 VMAT_FF 에 5 mm 볼루스 적용한 것과 비슷한 수준의 피부선량 전달이 가능할 것이라 사료되며, 이는 높은 피부선량이 필요하지만, 볼루스 적용이 어려운 환자와 같은 경우에 유용할 수 있다. 결 론: 볼루스 적용이 어려운 환자의 경우, VMAT와 FF에 비교하여 IMRT와 FFF를 적절히 조합한 치료 계획으로 피부 선량 증가를 기대할 수 있다.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.233-239
• /
• 2016

방사선 치료시 최근 많이 쓰이고 있는 IMRT, Tomotherapy, mArc(modulation arc therapy)의 치료법을 선량적인 측면에서 상호 비교하고자 한다. 비소세포성 폐암의 환자를 대상으로 하여 치료계획용적에 58.0 Gy를 처방선량을 기준으로 설정하였으며 주변 정상장기는 척수, 식도, 간을 설정 하였다. PTVmean는 mArc의 경우 57.60 Gy, Tomotherapy가 61.04 Gy, IMRT는 58.95 Gy이었다. 식도(Esophagus)의 평균선량은 mArc가 2.84 Gy였고, Tomotherapy가 5.14 Gy, IMRT가 1.84 Gy로 나타났다. 간(Liver)은 mArc는 19.44 Gy, Tomotherpy가 12.22 Gy, IMRT는 21.97 Gy이었고 척수(Spinal Cord)은 mArc 5.72 Gy, Tomotherapy가 7.08 Gy, IMRT는 6.15 Gy로 측정되었다. 또한, 선량포함도와 선량체적곡선 등의 자료를 관찰해 본 결과 mArc와 Tomotherapy 그리고 IMRT의 결과와 현저한 차이를 보이지는 않았다. 하지만, 본 연구는 폐암이라는 질환으로 한정하였었고 실험군의 수가 적은 단점을 가지고 있으므로 좀 더 많은 질환과 환자를 대상으로 연구를 폭넓게 진행 한다면 환자 맞춤형 치료기법을 개발하여 적용될 것으로 사료된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권12호
• /
• pp.5107-5111
• /
• 2016

Background: Epidemiological studies have indicated an increasing incidence of radiation induced secondary cancer (SC) in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy (RT), most commonly in the contra-lateral breast (CLB). The present study was conducted to estimate the SC risk in the CLB following 3D conformal radiotherapy techniques (3DCRT) including wedge field and forward intensity modulated radiotherapy (fIMRT) based on the organ equivalent dose (OED). Material and Methods: RT plans treating the chest wall with conformal wedge field and fIMRT plans were created for 30 breast cancer patients. The risks of radiation induced cancer were estimated for the CLB using dose-response models: a linear model, a linear-plateau model and a bell-shaped model with full dose response accounting for fractionated RT on the basis of OED. Results: The plans were found to be ranked quite differently according to the choice of model; calculations based on a linear dose response model fIMRT predict statistically significant lower risk compared to the enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW) technique (p-0.0089) and a non-significant difference between fIMRT and physical wedge (PW) techniques (p-0.054). The widely used plateau dose response model based estimation showed significantly lower SC risk associated with fIMRT technique compared to both wedge field techniques (fIMRT vs EDW p-0.013, fIMRT vs PW p-0.04). The full dose response model showed a non-significant difference between all three techniques in the view of second CLB cancer. Finally the bell shaped model predicted interestingly that PW is associated with significantly higher risk compared to both fIMRT and EDW techniques (fIMRT vs PW p-0.0003, EDW vs PW p-0.0032). Conclusion: In conclusion, the SC risk estimations of the CLB revealed that there is a clear relation between risk associated with wedge field and fIMRT technique depending on the choice of model selected for risk comparison.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.11-17
• /
• 2020

Purpose: Definitive radiotherapy remains a primary treatment option for early stage glottic cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has emerged as the standard treatment technique for advanced head and neck cancers, whereas three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has remained standard for early glottic cancers. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify predictors of IMRT use and effect on outcome in these patients. Materials and Methods: We queried the NCDB from 2004-2015 for squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx staged Tis-T2N0 treated with radiation alone. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of IMRT. Cox regression was used to identify factors predictive of overall survival. Propensity matching was conducted to account for indication bias. Results: We identified 15,627 patients, of which 11% received IMRT. IMRT use rose from 2% in 2004 to 16% in 2015. Predictors of IMRT include: increased comorbidity, T2 stage, urban location, chemotherapy, treatment at an academic center, and later treatment year. Predictors of improved survival were female gender, higher income, lower stage, no chemotherapy, academic facility, and more remote year. There was no difference in survival between 3D-CRT and IMRT across all stages. Conclusions: The rate of IMRT use for early stage glottic laryngeal cancer has increased over time. There was no difference in outcome in patients receiving IMRT versus 3D-CRT across the cohort.