• Title/Summary/Keyword: ILLICON

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Comparison on the Performance of Soil Improvement in Thick Soft Ground Using Single-Core and Double-Core PBD (단일 및 이중 코어 PBD에 의한 대심도 연약지반 개량 효과에 관한 비교연구)

  • Yang, Jeong-Hun;Hong, Sung-Jin;Kim, Hyung-Sub;Lee, Woo-Jin;Choi, Hang-Seok
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.25 no.8
    • /
    • pp.33-45
    • /
    • 2009
  • The conventional single-core PBDs have been widely used in order to accelerate consolidation settlement of soft grounds. When using the single-core PBD in a thick clay deposit, a delay of consolidation may occur due to high confining pressure in the thick deposit and necking of drains. This study is to compare the performances of soil improvement by the single-core and double-core PBD installed at a site in Busan New Port which exhibits approximately a 40m-thick clay layer. An in-situ test program was performed at the test site where a set of the double-core PBDs and single-core PBDs were installed to compare the efficiency of each drain. In addition, the discharge capacity of each PBD has been measured using the modified Delft Test. A series of laboratory tests for estimating in-situ soil properties have also been performed in order to obtain input parameters for a numerical program ILLICON. The discharge capacity of the double-core PBD is higher than that of the single-core PBD in the modified Delft Test. However it is observed from the comparative in-situ test and numerical analysis that there is no difference in the performance of ground improvement between the two drain systems. This discrepancy comes from the fact that the amount of water released during consolidation in most common field conditions is much smaller than the capacity of even the single core PBD. And thus, considering actual field conditions, it can be concluded that the single-core PBD has enough discharge capacity even in the thick clay deposit such as this test site.

A Study on Performance of Double-Core PBD for Improving Thick Reclaimed Ground (대심도 연약지반 개량을 위한 이중코어 PBD 성능연구)

  • Yang, Jeong-Hun;Hong, Sung-Jin;Lee, Woo-Jin;Choi, Hang-Seok;Kim, Hyung-Sub
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2008.03a
    • /
    • pp.281-292
    • /
    • 2008
  • Prefabricated Board Drains (PBDs) recently become more widely used than conventional sand drains in improving soft ground because the PBD is more time and cost effective. The performance of PBDs is affected by disturbance in the adjacent soil formation during inserting mandrels, the intrusion of fine particles into filter fabric, and necking of the drain by excessive lateral pressure especially occurring in very deep clay formation such as the Busan New Port site. In this study, the PBD with double-core is introduced, which seems to overcome the shortcomings of usual single-core PBDs. An in-situ test program was established in the Busan New Port site, in which a set of the double-core PBDs and the single-core PBDs was installed to compare the efficiency of each of the drains. The discharge capacity of the double-core and the single-core PBDs was compared for various confining pressures in the modified Delft test and the chamber test. A series of CRS consolidation tests was performed in order to obtain profiles of void ratio-effective stress and void ratio-permeability relationships in the Busan New Port site that are used as input date in performing a numerical program ILLICON. The numerically simulated settlements of ground surface in the test site are in good agreement with those of in-situ measurements. In addition, the performance of the double-core and single-core PBDs has been experimentally and numerically compared in this paper.

  • PDF

Vacuum distribution with depth in vertical drains and soil during preloading

  • Khan, Abdul Qudoos;Mesri, G.
    • Geomechanics and Engineering
    • /
    • v.6 no.4
    • /
    • pp.377-389
    • /
    • 2014
  • The vacuum consolidation method which was proposed by Kjellman in 1952 has been studied extensively and used successfully since early 1980 throughout the world, especially in East and Southeast Asia. Despite the increased successful use, different opinions still exist, especially in connection to distribution of vacuum with depth and time in vertical drains and in soil during preloading of soft ground. Porewater pressure measurements from actual cases of field vacuum and vacuum-fill preloading as well as laboratory studies have been examined. It is concluded that (a) a vacuum magnitude equal to that in the drainage blanket remains constant with depth and time within the vertical drains, (b) as expected, vacuum does not develop at the same rate within the soil at different depths; however, under ideal conditions vacuum is expected to become constant with depth in soil after the end of primary consolidation, and (c) there exists a possibility of internal leakage in vacuum intensity at some sublayers of a soft clay and silt deposit. A case history of vacuum loading with sufficient subsurface information is analyzed using the ILLICON procedure.