• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2005

A goal of this research is to propose the remodeling possibility from deteriorated stock apartment housing, to three generation family living in a dwelling unit for low incomes. An apartment housing which was built from 1970s, is accumulated over $55\%$ of the stock housing in Korea, many of them are confront with a rebuilding in a short usage of twenty years below. They are small one, and many of the residence complain narrow and small space compare to economic growth and their needs. This article deals the reform of two to one dwelling units, that it can be use for three generation family living as a new residence, because its spatial character is more controled privacy condition as a four bay spatial organization in the dwelling. The reform simulated in a 10, 13, 14, 15, and 16 pyung, the remodeling size became from 20 to 30 pyung, and its reform can be apply to extend life cycle of a stock confront with redevelopment. The possibility of the reform houses have more intensive privacy in a house compare with same area of new apartment. It tells us that we can recycle the deteriorate apartment house into three generation family living use, and it will be clue to change slum clearance into reform and recycle of deteriorate apartment house.

• 한국경제지리학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.293-302
• /
• 2002

경제체제 전환기의 중국은 20년에 걸쳐서 주택개혁을 추진하여 왔다. 국가가 계획하여 주택을 무상으로 분배하는 제도에서 실수요자가 화폐를 통해서 주택을 구입하는 제도로의 변화가 있었다 1998년 7월, 주택 화폐분배정책의 실행은, 주택의 상품화를 가로막고 있던 실물분배의 고리를 끊은 것으로서, 20년 중국 주택개혁의 완결이다. 주택개혁의 목적은 정부와 단위(단위)의 부담없이 주택을 공급하고, 재생산하는 것으로서 러시아의 주택개혁과는 주택공급을 중시한다는 점에서 차이가 있다. 중국의 주택개혁이 주택개혁을 이루기 위해서 정부는 '복지 관성'에서 벗어나지 못하는 주민들이 주택을 구입하게 하기 위해서 다양한 정책을 시도했다. 그러나 국가가 건축하고 분배해 주는 것을 당연시했던 주민들이 주택을 상품으로 받아들이는 과정은 오랜 시간이 소요되었다. 또한 토지와 결합되어 있고, 고가의 소비재로서 기타 상품들과 다른 속성을 가진 주택을 시장체제로 재생산하려는 정부의 노력은 중국에서 일반적인 상품을 시장화 하는 방식 - 시장가격을 통한 시장화 방식, 다양한 소유제를 통한 시장화 방식 - 이 주택에는 적용되지 않으므로 실패하였다. 그래서 정부는 정치적 부담에도 불구하고 주택 실물분배 포기 선언을 하게된다. 실물분배 포기 선언 이후, 주택은 개인주택 매매 시장을 통해 급속히 상품화되었다.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2004년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.381-385
• /
• 2004

A goal of this research is to propose and testify the remodeling possibility from deteriorated stock apartment housing, to three generation family living in a dwelling unit for low incomes. An apartment housing which is introduced from 1970s, is accumulated over 55% of the stock housing in Korea, many of them are confront with a rebuilding in a short usage of twenty years below. They were built in a small one, and it testified from two to one conversion in this article that can be applicated in a 10, 13, 14, I5, and 16 pyung, the remodeling size became from 20 to 36 pyung. In this article, we can see a reform model in possible for three generation family living in the small apartment house.

• 한국지역지리학회지
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.736-751
• /
• 2009

중국은 개혁 개방과 함께 사회주의 계획경제제도에서 자본주의 시장경제제도로 이행중이며 이러한 과정에서 주택의 상품화와 함께 빈곤의 문제가 수면위로 등장하게 되었다. 본 연구에서는 장소적 빈곤의 개념을 기반으로 하여, 국내외 문헌을 통해 중국의 사회보장제도와 주택의 상품화 과정을 분석하고 파악된 내용을 중심으로 중국의 주택상품화의 특징 및 문제점을 지적했다. 아울러, 중국을 8개 권역으로 구분하여 지역의 특성을 인구 사회적 지표, 경제적 지표, 주택지표로 고찰했다. 분석결과, 주택상품화 과정은 주거빈곤에 영향을 미치고 이었으며 권역별로 상이한 특징을 보였다. 본 연구에서는 중국의 지역별 상황이 매우 다양하므로 주거정책에서 일원적 방법이 아닌 다원적 방법으로 접근해야함을 제시한다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.33-46
• /
• 2016

In era of lowbirth, aging population, low growth and social polarization, the effective welfare delivery systems are taking on added significance than past years. Public housing welfare resources, such as public rental housing, housing voucher, affordable housing loan, are more diversified and expanded. These programs could work effectively by the comprehensive interlink and community based delivery system. From the standpoint of recipients, how effectively the substantial benefits of welfare resources being delivered to each individual is more important than how much welfare resources being produced totally. This study aimed to explore the reform of public housing welfare delivery system. For this purpose, diagnosed the current states and key issues related to public delivery system, and analyzed what kinds of housing welfare services should be strengthened, and finally suggested the collaboration among the public sectors (local government, LH, HUG, HF etc.) and the partnership with non-profit organizations. Main research implications are as follows. The main housing welfare services which could be categorized as the housing welfare center's role are advice & information offering, several public resources interlink and accessibility improvement, community based network construction, etc. And the most important key for successful delivery system reorganization is the collaborative operation of the public sectors and local government, non-profit organizations.

• 한국경제지리학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.743-763
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 개혁개방 이후 형성된 사회주의 시장경제 하 중국 주택체제의 성격을 중국의 공공주택 정책인 보장성 주택 정책을 중심으로 주택시스템 비교연구의 관점에서 분석하였다. 중국 주택시스템의 전환은 시장기능의 도입과 사회주의 토지공유제의 약화라는 점에서 차별적인 '사회주의 시장경제 주택시스템'의 형성이 아닌, 자본주의 주택시스템의 하위유형으로 전환한 것으로 볼 수 있다. 이것은 기존 정부 공급형 계획의 사회주의 방식이 정부의 간접적인 개입과 조정에 따라 시장요소를 통해 주택이 공급되는 정부 주도형 시장화의 방식으로 전환한 것이며, 정부가 가지는 시장주도력은 사회주의적 토지소유의 유산에 기반하고 있다는 점에서 차별화된다.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.133-144
• /
• 2013

It is commonplace to refer to the Nordic countries of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Iceland as a distinctive and homogenous welfare regime. As far as social housing is concerned, however, the institutional heritage of the respective countries significantly frames the ways in which social housing is understood, regulated and subsidized, and, in turn, how housing regimes respond to the general challenges to the national welfare states. The paper presents a historical institutionalist approach to understanding the diversity of regime responses in the modern era characterized by increasing marketization, welfare criticism and internationalization. The aim is to provide outside readers a theoretically guided empirical insight into Scandinavian social housing policy. The paper first lines up the core of the inbuilt argument of historical institutionalism in housing policy. Secondly, it briefly introduces the distinctive ideal typical features of the five housing regimes, which reveals the first internal distinction between the universal policies of Sweden and Denmark selective policies of Iceland and Finland. The Norwegian case constitutes a transitional model from general to selective during the past quarter of a decade. The third section then concentrates on the differences between Denmark, Sweden and Norway in which social housing is, our was originally, embedded in a universal welfare policy targeting the general level of housing quality for the entire population. Differences stand out, however, between finance, ownership, regulation and governance. The historical institutional argument is, that these differences frame the way in which actors operating on the respective policy arenas can and do respond to challenges. Here, in this section we lose Norway, which de facto has come to operate in a residual manner, due to contemporary effects of the long historical heritage of home ownership. The fourth section then discusses the recent challenges of welfare criticism, internationalization and marketization to the universal models in Denmark and Sweden. Here, it is argued that the institutional differences between the Swedish model of municipal ownership and the Danish model of independent cooperative social housing associations provides different sources of resistance to the prospective dismantlement of social housing as we know it. The fifth section presents the recent Danish reform of the governance model of social housing policy in which the housing associations are conceived of as 'dialogue partners' in the local housing policy, expected to create solutions to, rather than produce problems in social housing areas. The reform testifies to the strategic ability of the Danish social housing associations to employ their historically grounded institutional relative independence of the public system.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2004년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.257-262
• /
• 2004

The very problem we are to touch in this study is that our own types of urban housing complex are isolated from the existing residential environment. The closed and self-completing structures of past urban housing complexes didn't develop the communal spirit and it has increased anti-city trends. With all that, this study intends to provide some materials to reform our urban housing environment through analyzing former European examples on the basis of the development of our own urban housing types which will correspond with existing urban structure and urban tissue.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2014

This study analyzes the architectural characteristics of Godin's Social Palace system of ideal housing for laborers during the 19th century. Utopian socialists in the first half of the 19th century proposed different solutions to reform their chaotic capitalist society, in response to the maladies of the Industrial Revolution. Fourier designed an ideal housing referred to as the Phalanstere, in which residences coexisted in a cooperative society. His disciples tried in vain to make this ideal housing system real. The only realization of this type of ideal housing was called Godin's Social Palace, which was constructed in Guise, France. The main architectural characteristics of Godin's Social Palace are as follows: dwelling units in consideration of function and expansion are applied basically in the housing. Further, a natural ventilation system is applied between housing and courtyard, and water supply is established in the housing. In Particular, natural lighting and artificial illumination are used in the entire building appropriately. In addition, a device which promotes a community between inhabitants is established. As for such modern facilities and social devices, inhabitants were able to live a more comfortable life. Hence, it is confirmed to have been one of the important factors for sustaining the Social Palace for more than 100 years.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2003년도 정기총회 및 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.221-227
• /
• 2003

The characteristics of Japanese housing stock is as follows. 1. It is predicted that population from 2010 and general household from 2015 will decrease. The aging speed in Japan is faster than several advanced nations. 2. Housing shortage has resolved from 1973. In 1998, dwelling number per household is 1.13 houses and vacant dwelling rate is 11.5 percents. 3. Dwelling level of rented dwelling is lower than owner occupied houses; for instance, floor area of the former is one third of the latter. As for a household of thirties, family type household lived in rented houses reached 60 percents, it reveals that the demand exceeds the supply. 4. Houses constructed before the new earthquake resistant standard enforced from 1981 year is the half of the whole, housing improvement is needed in the future. Future housing market is changed to practical use of housing stock. Consequently, expansion of multi-habitation used a vacant housing of city dwellers, activation of the used houses distribution, growth of dwelling reform market, and activation of the rented houses are expected.