• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.235-245
• /
• 1999

The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of household characteristics on housing expenditure. The data from the National Survey of Family Income and Expenditure 1996 were used for the analysis of this study, and the final sample included 12,323 households. It was found that total housing expenditure was significantly different according to the tenure type, household income, household size, age, occupation and education of the head, or location of housing. The significantly explanatory variables in the model of total housing expenditure were owner and yearly-renter dummy, household income and the household income squared, mortgage-off dummy, Seoul and metropolitan city dummy, and employed-wife dummy.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.21-33
• /
• 2011

This paper aims to explore the characteristics of Bogeumjari Housing Program and its significance to housing policy, and propose an appropriate direction of future housing policy for low-income households without home ownership based on actual data on housing careers and preferences of the policy target households. Supply of Bogeumjary Housing is characterized by consolidation of existing housing program, housing support by income level, differentiation of eligible households, and housing subscription on-line. Bogeumjari Housing Program is meaningful in that it is a policy that resumed the supply of permanent housing, provides multi-tier support system by income level, and adjusts the imbalances in housing demand and supply. Despite their strong preferences for Bogeumjari Housing, their affordability is very low due to their low income levels and gloomy outlook for household finances. In this light, the government should pursue housing policies that include not only new housing constructions, but also efficient use of housing stocks, expansion of loans for first-time home buyers, and introduction of home mortgage and housing voucher.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• 통권153호
• /
• pp.22-23
• /
• 2003

대통력직 인수위원회에서 ''아파트 후분양 제도 도입''을 검토 중이라는 사실이 언론에 알려지면서 이에 대한 찬반 양론이 팽팽히 맞서고 있다. 주택건설 공급자 금융(Construction Mortgage)제도가 발달되지 못한 상황에서 선분양 대금에 크게 의존하는 현행 주택 공급 방식의 구조적 한계로 인해 후분양제 도입시 주택 공급이 크게 감소할 것이라는 우려가 제기되고 있다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.151-157
• /
• 2013

Since the sub-prime mortgage crisis from the US in 2008, the Korean housing market has plummeted. However, the deposit prices of the Korean local lease contract, Chonsei, had been increasing. This increase of Chonsei prices can be a threat to low-income people, most of whom prefer to live in houses with a Chonsei contract. In the housing and Chonsei market, there are many stakeholders with their own interest, hence, simple thoughts about housing and Chonsei market, such as more house supply, will decrease house price, would not work in a real complex housing market. In this research, we suggests system dynamics conceptual model which consists of causal-loop-diagrams for the Chonsei market as well as the housing market. In conclusion, the Chonsei price has its own homeostasis characteristics and different price behavior with housing price in the short and long term period. We found that unless government does not have a structural causation mind in implementing policies in the real estate market, the government may not attain their intended effectiveness on both markets.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.83-89
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 은행 대출이 주택가격에 미치는 영향을 분석하였으며, 은행 대출을 은행 총대출금, 가계대출금, 부동산담보대출금으로 구분하였고, 주택가격을 전국, 지방, 서울 주택가격으로 구분하여 분석하였다. 주요한 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 은행 총대출금의 증가는 전국, 지방, 서울 주택가격을 유의하게 상승시키는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 가계대출금은 지방 주택가격에 양(+)의 영향을 미치지만 통계적으로 유의하지는 않은 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 은행 대출이 지방 주택가격에 미치는 영향은 전국 주택가격에 미치는 영향에 비해서는 상대적으로 작은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 은행 대출이 지방 주택가격과 서울 주택가격에 미치는 영향은 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 인플레이션과 은행 총대출은 1분기의 시차를 가지고 지방 주택가격에 유의한 양(+)의 영향을 미쳤으며, 단기금리는 1분기의 시차를 가지고 서울 주택가격에 유의한 음(-)의 영향을 미쳤다. 전체적으로는 은행 대출이 주택가격에 미치는 영향이 지방보다는 서울에 약 2배 정도 더 큰 양(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국인구학
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.65-86
• /
• 1985

Korean population is ecpected to reach about 50 million by year 2000. And per capita GNP might attain the $5,000 level. This is bound to have profound impact on housing. For one thing, population and income growth will accelerate new household formation thus increasing new housing needs. On the other, changes in the housing preference function in association with income growth and new way of life would mean increasing demand for better dwelling environment. In addition, by year 2000, there will be many more elderly households necessitating new approaches to housing. The question is whether or not Korea could cope with new housing perspectives. If Korean housing has made in the past some progress in housing quality, it has not been able to tackle the mounting housing shortage. This is attributable to the concentration of effective housing demand in the hands of upper income groups in association with skewed income distribution and sustained dwelling price hike. Korea needs some basic changes in housing policy. The public sector should produce much more small dwellings either for sales or renting. Second, mortgage loans should be expanded so as to increase the access to housing. Third, every thing must be done to cut down the dwelling price through tax cut, relaxation of some requlations, cyclical stabilization of dwelling construction and loan subsidies.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2021

With CB data in South Korea, this study examines whether the credit risk of borrowers changes when the regulation on bank mortgage supply is relaxed. We analyze the effect of deregulation on LTV and DTI limits in the Seoul-metropolitan area in August 2014 with a difference-in-difference approach. We find that the probability of delinquency is lower in the Seoul metropolitan area after the deregulation than in other urban areas. The effect is noticeable among low-income and low-credit borrowers. We also find that borrowers change their debt structure to reduce the interest costs utilizing their improved access to bank mortgages. The findings suggest the necessity to consider the burden of the high interest costs of unsecured loans for debtors with low incomes and low credit ratings in designing housing finance regulations.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.41-52
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This study aims to provide implications for the government's housing supply policy by analyzing the factors that determine the type of real estate holding and household debt. This study started from the awareness that the determinants of household debt differ depending on the type of real estate holding. Research design, data and methodology: Real estate ownership type was classified and analyzed into 4 models: model 1 (1 household 1 house and self-resident), model 2 (1 household multiple real estate ownership and self-resident), model 3 (1 household 1 house and rent residence), model 4 (1 household holds a large number of real estate and rent residence). The analysis method used multiple regression analysis. The dependent variable was household total debt. As independent variables, household debt, annual gross household income, financial assets, real estate net assets, annual repayment, demographic & residential characteristics were used. Results: 1) Model 4 has the highest household debt and the highest gross income, Model 2 has the most real estate mortgage loans and real estate net asset, and Model 1 has the highest real estate mortgage payments. 2) The positive factor of common household debt determinants is real estate net assets, and the negative factor is financial assets. 3) It was the net assets of real estate that acted as a positive factor in common for the four models. In other words, the more financial assets, the less household debt. It was analyzed that the more net assets of real estate, the more household debt. The annual repayment of financial liabilities had no influence on household debt, while the annual repayment of loan liabilities and household debt had a positive relationship. Conclusions: 1) It is necessary to introduce benefits and systems that can increase the proportion of household financial asset. Specific alternatives include tax benefits and reduced fees for financial asset investment. 2) In the case where a homeless person prepares one house for one household, it is necessary to prepare various support measures according to the income level. The specific alternative is to give additional points for pre-sale or apply an interest rate cut incentive for mortgage loans.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.53-65
• /
• 2024

During COVID-19 the housing market in Korea experienced the soaring prices, despite the decrease in the economic growth rate. This paper aims to analyze macroeconomic determinants affecting housing prices in Korea during the pandemic and find an appropriate statistic model to forecast the changes in housing prices in Korea. First, an appropriate lag for the model using Akaike information criterion was found. After the macroeconomic factors were checked if they possess the unit root, the dependencies in the model were analyzed using vector autoregression (VAR) model. As for the prediction, the VAR model was used and, besides, compared afterwards with the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. CPI, mortgage rate, IIP at lag 1 and federal funds effective rate at lag 1 and 2 were found to be significant for housing prices. In addition, the prediction performance of the LSTM model appeared to be more accurate in comparison with the VAR model. The results of the analysis play an essential role in policymaker perception when making decisions related to managing potential housing risks arose during crises. It is essential to take into considerations macroeconomic factors besides the taxes and housing policy amendments and use an appropriate model for prices forecast.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.55-75
• /
• 2023

본 연구에서는 부동산 정책, 조세정책, 금융정책, 규제지수에대한 이론적고찰과 선행연구를 살펴보고 전국의 2014년1월부터 2021년 12월 까지의 월별데이터를 이용하여 조세정책과 금융정책이 부동산가격에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 분석방법은 단위근 검정과 공적분 검정을 통해 VAR모형을 사용하여 분석하였으며 충격반응분석과 분산분해분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 조세규제지수와 금융규제지수는 주택가격에 영향을 미치지 못하였다. 주택가격 상승기에 주택가격 안정을 위하여 규제 일변도의 정책은 효과가 없으며 오히려 거래량 감소 등으로 가격을 상승시키는 부작용이 생긴다. 둘째, 주택담보대출금리는 주택매매가격지수에 음(-)의 효과를 주었다. 즉, 이자율의 상승이 주택가격을 하락시키는 효과가 있다는 의미로 보여진다. 셋째, 양도차액의 상승 즉, 양도소득세의 과세는 주택가격에 양(+)의 효과를 준다. 이는 조세를 매수자에게 전가시키거나 조세부담으로 인해 매각을 보류하는 동결효과로 주택가격을 상승시키는 결과가 나왔다. 넷째, 취득세와 주택담보대출액은 주택가격에 별다른 영향을 미치지 못하였다.