• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.156-160
• /
• 2019

Background: To compare the dose of radiation received by the fetus in a pregnant patient irradiated for head and neck cancer using helical tomotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). Materials and Methods: The patient was modeled with a humanoid phantom to mimic a gestation of 26 weeks. Radiotherapy with a total dose of 2 Gy was delivered with both tomotherapy (2.5 and 5.0 cm jaw size) and 3DCRT. The position of the fetus was predicted to be 45 cm from the field edge at the time of treatment. The delivered dose was measured according to the distance from the field edge and the fetus. Results and Discussion: The accumulated dose to the fetus was 1.6 cGy by 3DCRT and 2 and 2.3 cGy by the 2.5 and 5 cm jaw tomotherapy plans. For tomotherapy, the fetal dose with the 2.5 cm jaw was lower than that with the 5 cm jaw, although the radiation leakage was greater for 2.5 cm jaw plan due to the 1.5 fold longer beam-on time. At the uterine fundus, tomotherapy with a 5 cm jaw delivered the highest dose of 2.4 cGy. When the fetus moves up to 35 cm at the 29th week of gestation, the resultant fetal doses for 3DCRT and tomotherapy with 2.5 and 5 cm jaws were estimated as 2.1, 2.7, and 3.9 cGy, respectively. Conclusion: For tomotherapy, scattering radiation was more important due to the high monitor unit values. Therefore, selecting a smaller jaw size for tomotherapy may reduce the fetal dose. however, evaluation of risk should be individually performed for each patient.

• 대한두경부종양학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한두경부종양학회 2008년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.271-271
• /
• 2008

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.219-227
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This study evaluated the treatment effectiveness and proper radiation dose of helical tomotherapy (HT) in spine oligometastases from gastrointestinal cancers. Materials and Methods: From 2006 to 2010, 20 gastrointestinal cancer patients were treated with HT for spine oligometastases (31 spine lesions). The gross tumor volume (GTV) was the tumor evident from magnetic resonance imaging images fused with simulation computed tomography images. Clinical target volume (CTV) encompassed involved vertebral bodies or dorsal elements. We assumed that the planning target volume was equal to the CTV. We assessed local control rate after HT for 31 spine metastases. Pain response was scored by using a numeric pain intensity scale (NPIS, from 0 to 10). Results: Spine metastatic lesions were treated with median dose of 40 Gy (range, 24 to 51 Gy) and median 5 Gy per fraction (range, 2.5 to 8 Gy) to GTV with median 8 fractions (range, 3 to 20 fraction). Median biologically equivalent dose (BED, ${\alpha}/{\beta}$ = 10 Gy) was 52 $Gy_{10}$ (range, 37.5 to 76.8 $Gy_{10}$) to GTV. Six month local control rate for spine metastasis was 90.3%. Overall infield failure rate was 15% and outfield failure rate was 75%. Most patients showed pain relief after HT (93.8%). Median local recurrence free survival was 3 months. BED over 57 $Gy_{10}$ and oligometastases were identified as prognostic factors associated with improved local progression free survival (p = 0.012, P = 0.041). Conclusion: HT was capable of delivering higher BED to metastatic lesions in close proximity of the spinal cord. Spine metastases from gastrointestinal tumors were sensitive to high dose radiation, and BED (${\alpha}/{\beta}$ = 10 Gy) higher than 57 $Gy_{10}$ could improve local control.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2019

Purpose: This study conducts a comparative evaluation of the skin dose in CyberKnife (CK) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT) to predict the accurate dose of radiation and minimize skin burns in head-and-neck stereotactic body radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Arbitrarily-defined planning target volume (PTV) close to the skin was drawn on the planning computed tomography acquired from a head-and-neck phantom with 19 optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) attached to the surface (3 OSLDs were positioned at the skin close to PTV and 16 OSLDs were near sideburns and forehead, away from PTV). The calculation doses were obtained from the MultiPlan 5.1.2 treatment planning system using raytracing (RT), finite size pencil beam (FSPB), and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for CK. For HT, the skin dose was estimated via convolution superposition (CS) algorithm from the Tomotherapy planning station 5.0.2.5. The prescribed dose was 8 Gy for 95% coverage of the PTV. Results and Conclusions: The mean differences between calculation and measurement values were $-1.2{\pm}3.1%$, $2.5{\pm}7.9%$, $-2.8{\pm}3.8%$, $-6.6{\pm}8.8%$, and $-1.4{\pm}1.8%$ in CS, RT, RT with contour correction (CC), FSPB, and MC, respectively. FSPB showed a dose error comparable to RT. CS and RT with CC led to a small error as compared to FSPB and RT. Considering OSLDs close to PTV, MC minimized the uncertainty of skin dose as compared to other algorithms.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제34권
• /
• pp.13-20
• /
• 2022

목 적: 비인두암 (Nasopharyngeal cancer) 방사선 치료 시 Tomotherapy을 이용한 IMRT는 종양 조직에 정확한 선량을 전달하며 정상조직에는 급격한 선량 감소의 효과가 있지만 MU가 높고 Beam On Time이 긴 단점이 있다. 본 연구는 Helical IMRT (Tomotherapy)와 VMAT (Linac : 2Arc), Split VMAT (Linac : 4Arc)의 치료계획을 시행하여 종양 및 정상 조직, 저 선량 분포의 차이를 분석하고 Split VMAT의 효율성을 평가해 보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 본원의 비인두암 환자 10명을 대상으로 하였으며 3개 치료계획 (Helical IMRT, VMAT, Split VMAT)을 비교하였다. Helical IMRT 치료 계획은 Precision^® (Version 1.1.1.1, Accuray, USA)을 이용하였고 VMAT, Split VMAT 치료계획은 Pinnacle3^® (Version 9.10, Philips, USA)을 이용하였다. 선량은 Daily Dose 2.4 Gy (GTV + 0.3 cm) / 2 Gy (CTV + 0.3 cm) 16 Fx으로 Total Dose 38.4 Gy / 32 Gy를 적용하였고 GTV + 0.3 cm (P_GTV)가 V_38.4Gy이 95%가 되도록 처방하였다. VMAT은 360° 2Arc, Split VMAT은 좌, 우, 상, 하로 Field를 나누고 360° 4Arc, 6MV를 사용하였다. 평가는 종양 및 정상조직, 저 선량 영역의 차이를 비교하여 치료 계획의 Quality를 평가하였고 Beam On Time을 비교하여 효율성을 평가하였다. 결 과: 대상 환자들의 3개 치료계획 (Helical IMRT, VMAT, Split VMAT)의 평가 항목 평균 값은 P_GTV의 H.I (Homogeneity Index)는 (1.04, 1.11, 1.1), P_CTV의 C.I (Conformity Index)는 (1.03, 0.99, 1.00)이었다. RT Parotid Gland의 평균 선량 (Gy)은 (14.54, 17.06, 14.76), LT Parotid Gland의 평균 선량 (Gy)은 (14.32, 17.32, 15.09), P_Cord (Spinal Cord + 0.3 cm)의 최대 선량 (Gy)은 (20.57, 22.59, 21.06), Brain Stem의 최대 선량 (Gy)은 (22.35, 23.99, 21.68)이었다. 50% isodose curve (cc)는 (1332, 1132.5, 1065.2)이었다. Beam On Time (sec)은 (373.7, 130.7, 254.4)이었다. 결 론: Split VMAT은 두경부치료에 많이 사용하는 Helical IMRT와 비교했을 때 유사한 치료계획 Quality를 보이면서도 저 선량 영역을 줄여주며 Beam On Time이 줄어든 결과를 보여주었고 VMAT보다 좋은 결과를 보였다. Split VMAT은 비인두암 뿐만 아니라 다른 두경부암에서도 효과적이라 사료된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.206-215
• /
• 2013

Purpose: Re-irradiation (re-RT) is considered a treatment option for inoperable locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) after prior radiotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-RT using Helical Tomotherapy as image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in recurrent HNC. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with recurrent HNC and received re-RT were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were locoregional control and toxicities. Results: The median follow-up period of total 9 patients was 18.7 months (range, 4.1 to 76 months) and that of 3 alive patients was 49 months (range, 47 to 76 months). Median dose of first radiotherapy and re-RT was 64.8 and 47.5 $Gy_{10}$. Median cumulative dose of the two courses of radiotherapy was 116.3 $Gy_{10}$ (range, 91.8 to 128.9 $Gy_{10}$) while the median interval between the two courses of radiation was 25 months (range, 4 to 137 months). The response rate after re-RT of the evaluated 8 patients was 75% (complete response, 4; partial response, 2). Median locoregional relapse-free survival after re-RT was 11.9 months (range, 3.4 to 75.1 months) and 5 patients eventually presented with treatment failure (in-field failure, 2; in- and out-field failure, 2; out-field failure, 1). Median OS of the 8 patients was 20.3 months (range, 4.1 to 75.1 months). One- and two-year OS rates were 62.5% and 50%, respectively. Grade 3 leucopenia developed in one patient as acute toxicity, and grade 2 osteonecrosis and trismus as chronic toxicity in another patient. Conclusion: Re-RT using Helical Tomotherapy for previously irradiated patients with unresectable locoregionally recurrent HNC may be a feasible treatment option with long-term survival and acceptable toxicities.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.145-149
• /
• 2013

의료용 선형가속기 (linear accelerator)와 나선형 컴퓨터 단층 촬영 장치 (helical computed tomography scanner)의 결합 장치인 토모테라피는 세기 변조 방사선 치료 (intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT))의 큰 혁신을 이끌었다. 토모테라피 치료 과정에서, Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) 영상획득은 치료 환자의 정확한 자세 정렬을 위해 치료 전 또는 후에 이용된다. 그러나 이는 환자의 총 선량을 증가시키는 결과를 만들며, 본 연구는 이처럼 MVCT 영상 획득 시 증가되는 선량을 Cylindrical "Cheese" Phantom을 이용하여 측정, 비교하였다. 각각의 pitch 별로 (1, 2, 3 mm) 동일한 개수의 slice (10 slice), 그리고 동일한 length (약 9 cm)를 scanning하여, 이때의 선량 (MVCT Scanning Dose)을 A1SL ion chamber를 이용하여 측정하였다. 측정 결과 동일한 Slice 개수 (각각의 pitch 당 10개)일 때, MVCT scanning dose의 평균값은 각각 (pitch 1, 2, 3mm) 2.24 cGy, 1.02 cGy, 0.81 cGy가 측정되었다. 동일한 length에서 MVCT scanning dose의 평균값은 각각 (pitch 1, 2, 3mm) 2.47 cGy, 1.28 cGy, 0.88 cGy가 측정되었다. 이는 할당된 pitch와 scanning length가 MVCT scanning dose에 큰 영향을 미치는 가장 중요한 매개 변수임을 말하며, pitch는 MVCT scanning dose와 역비례 관계를 나타냈다. 때문에 적절한 pitch와 scanning length의 선택으로 치료 선량 외의 추가 선량을 최소로 줄여야 하겠다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.193-198
• /
• 2014

본 연구의 목적은 새로 개발된 2차원 토모테라피 선량측정 시스템의 가능성을 알아보는 것이다. 방사선이 조사되면 가시광성을 내보내는 인광판을 원통형 물팬텀에 삽입하였다. 치료계획장치에서 원 모양, C자 모양, 다중표적 3종류의 가상의 표적을 만들고 각 표적에 10 Gy의 방사선을 전달하도록 하였다. 원통형 팬텀을 토모테라피 치료테이블위에 올려놓고 치료계획대로 방사선을 조사하였다. CCD카메라로 쵤영된 모든 프레임은 누적되었고 각 픽셀은 선량으로 변환되었다. 인광판으로부터 나온 영상은 치료계획장치에서 계산된 선량분포와 비교하였다. 선량기울기(dose rate)와 픽셀값의 관계그래프는 선량기울기 900 MU/min 까지 포화(saturated)되지 않았다. 인광판의 선형성 보정이 개선된다면 인광판과 CCD카메라를 이용한 토모테라피의 2차원 선량측정이 유용할 것으로 기대한다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.252-259
• /
• 2013

Purpose: To report the results of dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using Tomotherapy and four-box field conformal radiotherapy (CRT) for pelvic irradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received a short course preoperative chemoradiotherapy (25 Gy in 5 fractions) on the pelvis using Tomotherapy, between July 2010 and December 2010, were selected. Using their simulation computed tomography scans, Tomotherapy and four-box field CRT plans with the same dose schedule were evaluated, and dosimetric parameters of the two plans were compared. For the comparison of target coverage, we analyzed the mean dose, $V_{nGy}$, $D_{min}$, $D_{max}$, radical dose homogeneity index (rDHI), and radiation conformity index (RCI). For the comparison of organs at risk (OAR), we analyzed the mean dose. Results: Tomotherapy showed a significantly higher mean target dose than four-box field CRT (p = 0.001). But, $V_{26.25Gy}$ and $V_{27.5Gy}$ were not significantly different between the two modalities. Tomotherapy showed higher $D_{max}$ and lower $D_{min}$. The Tomotherapy plan had a lower rDHI than four-box field CRT (p = 0.000). Tomotherapy showed better RCI than four-box field CRT (p = 0.007). For OAR, the mean irradiated dose was significantly lower in Tomotherapy than four-box field CRT. Conclusion: In locally advanced rectal cancer, Tomotherapy delivers a higher conformal radiation dose to the target and reduces the irradiated dose to OAR than four-box field CRT.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.1687-1692
• /
• 2015

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is an endemic disease within specific regions in the world. Radiotherapy is the main treatment. In recent decades, intensity-modulated radiation therapy has undergone a rapid evolution. Compared with two-dimensional radiotherapy and/or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, evidence has shown it may improve quality of life and prognosis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In addition, helical tomotherapy is an emerging technology of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Its superiority in dosimetric and clinical outcomes has been demonstrated when compared to traditional intensity-modulated radiation therapy. However, many challenges need to be overcome for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the future. Issues such as the status of concurrent chemotherapy, updating of target delineation, the role of replanning during IMRT, the causes of the main local failure pattern require settlement. The present study reviews traditional intensity-modulated radiation therapy, helical tomotherapy, and new challenges in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.