• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제40권6호
• /
• pp.748-753
• /
• 2013

Background Nasal reconstruction is one of the most difficult challenges for the head and neck surgeon, especially in the case of complex full thickness defects following malignant skin tumor resection. Full-thickness defects require demanding multi-step reconstruction. Methods Seven patients underwent surgical reconstruction of full-thickness nasal defects with a bi-pedicled forehead flap shaped appropriately to the defect. Patients were aged between 58 and 86 years, with a mean age of 63.4 years. All of the tumors were excised using traditional surgery, and in 4 of the patients, reconstruction was performed simultaneously following negativity of fresh frozen sections of the margins under general anesthesia. Results Nasal reconstruction was well accepted by all of the patients suffering non-melanoma skin tumors with acceptable cosmetic outcomes. The heart-shaped forehead flap was harvested in cases of subtotal involvement of the nasal pyramid, while smaller defects were reconstructed with a wing-shaped flap. No cartilaginous or osseous support was necessary. Conclusions This bi-pedicled forehead flap was a valid, versatile, and easy-to-implement alternative to microsurgery or multi-step reconstruction. The flap is the best indication for full-thickness nasal defects but can also be indicated for other complex facial defects in the orbital (exenteratio orbitae), zygomatic, and cheek area, for which the availability of a flap equipped with two thick and hairless lobes can be a valuable resource.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.301-304
• /
• 2007

33세 남자가 심와부 불편감을 주소로 내원하여 흉부컴퓨터단층촬영과 심초음파에서 좌심방 내 점액 종으로 수술적 절제하였다. 12개월 후 외래추적 검사에서 첫 번째 수술과 관계없는 부위인 우심방 내 점액종이 발견되어 재수술하였으며 10개월간 재발 없이 지내고 있다. 우리나라에서는 좌심방 내 점액종 제거 후 재발된 좌심방 내 점액종은 보고된 적이 있지만, 우심방에 재발된 경우는 보고된 바가 없어 치험례를 보고한다.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2015

The purpose of the present review is to give an overview of the association between alcohol intake and the risk of developing cancer. Two large-scale expert reports; the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute of Cancer Research (AICR) report from 2007, including its continuous update project, and the International Agency for Research of Cancer (IARC) monograph from 2012 have extensively reviewed this association in the last decade. We summarize and compare their findings, as well as relate these to the public health impact, with a particular focus on region-specific drinking patterns and disease tendencies. Our findings show that alcohol intake is strongly linked to the risk of developing cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, oesophagus, colorectum (in men), and female breast. The two expert reports diverge on the evidence for an association with liver cancer and colorectal cancer in women, which the IARC grades as convincing, but the WCRF/AICR as probable. Despite these discrepancies, there does, however, not seem to be any doubt, that the Population Attributable Fraction of alcohol in relation to cancer is large. As alcohol intake varies largely worldwide, so does, however, also the Population Attributable Fractions, ranging from 10% in Europe to almost 0% in countries where alcohol use is banned. Given the World Health Organization's prediction, that alcohol intake is increasing, especially in low- and middle-income countries, and steadily high in high-income countries, the need for preventive efforts to curb the number of alcohol-related cancers seems growing, as well as the need for taking a region- and gender-specific approach in both future campaigns as well as future research. The review acknowledges the potential beneficial effects of small doses of alcohol in relation to ischaemic heart disease, but a discussion of this lies without the scope of the present study.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.279-297
• /
• 2021

Purpose: Various changes in nutrition, metabolism, immunity, and psychological status occur through multiple mechanisms after gastrectomy. The purpose of this study was to predict disease status after gastrectomy by analyzing diseases pattern that occur or change after gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using nationwide claims data. Patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy or endoscopic resection were included in the study. Eighteen target diseases were selected and categorized based on their underlying mechanism. The incidence of each target disease was compared by dividing the study sample into those who underwent gastrectomy (cases) and those who underwent endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (controls). The cases were matched with controls using propensity score matching. Thereafter, Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate intergroup differences in disease incidence after gastrectomy. Results: A total of 97,634 patients who underwent gastrectomy (84,830) or endoscopic resection (12,804) were included. The incidence of cholecystitis (P<0.0001), pancreatitis (P=0.034), acute kidney injury (P=0.0083), anemia (P<0.0001), and inguinal hernia (P=0.0007) were higher after gastrectomy, while incidence of dyslipidemia (P<0.0001), vascular diseases (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and atherosclerosis; P<0.0001, P<0.0001, and P=0.0005), and Parkinson's disease (P=0.0093) were lower after gastrectomy. Conclusions: This study identifies diseases that may occur after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

• 대한종양외과학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.102-107
• /
• 2018

Purpose: Cardiotoxicity is a serious late complication of breast cancer treatment. Individual treatment risk of specific drugs has been investigated. However, studies on the evaluation of the composite risk of chemotherapeutic agents are limited. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of breast cancer patients who received adjuvant treatment and had available serial echocardiography results. Patients were assigned to subgroups based on chemotherapy containing anthracyclines (A), anthracyclines and taxanes (A+T), and radiotherapy (RT). The development of cardiac disease and serial ejection fraction (EF) were reviewed. EF decline up to 10% from baseline was considered grade 1 cardiotoxicity and EF decline >20% or absolute value <50% was considered grade 2 cardiotoxicity. The most recent medical records and echocardiography results over 1 year of chemotherapy completion were also reviewed. Late cardiotoxicity was defined as a lack of recovery of EF decline or aggravated EF decline from baseline. Results: In total, 123 patients were evaluated. A small reduction in EF was observed after chemotherapy in both chemotherapy groups. There were no significant differences between groups A and A+T in EF decline following chemotherapy. We could not find any differences in composite risk between the chemotherapy groups and the RT group during follow-up. Late cardiotoxicity was seen in 15.45% of patients. During follow-up, three patients were diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy. Conclusion: There was no significant composite risk elevation following adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, late cardiotoxicity was considerable and further research in this direction is necessary.

• Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.159-168
• /
• 2023

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for diagnosis of cardiac tumours is histopathological examination. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a valuable non-invasive, radiation-free tool for identifying and characterizing cardiac tumours. Our aim is to understand CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours by distinguishing benign vs. malignant tumours compared to the gold standard. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to December 2022, and the results were reviewed by 2 independent investigators. Studies reporting CMR diagnosis were included in a meta-analysis, and pooled measures were obtained. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tools from the National Institutes of Health. RESULTS: A total of 2,321 results was obtained; 10 studies were eligible, including one identified by citation search. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis, which presented a pooled sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 94%, a diagnostic odds ratio of 185, and an area under the curve of 0.98 for CMR diagnosis of benign vs. malignant tumours. Additionally, 4 studies evaluated whether CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours matched specific histopathological subtypes, with 73.6% achieving the correct diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published systematic review on CMR diagnosis of cardiac tumours. Compared to histopathological results, the ability to discriminate benign from malignant tumours was good but not outstanding. However, significant heterogeneity may have had an impact on our findings.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제57권2호
• /
• pp.169-177
• /
• 2024

Background: Pericardial effusion (PE) is a serious condition in cancer patients, primarily arising from malignant dissemination. Pericardial window formation is a surgical intervention for refractory PE. However, the long-term outcomes and factors associated with postoperative survival remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 166 oncology patients who underwent pericardial window formation at Samsung Medical Center between 2011 and 2023. We analyzed survival and PE recurrence regarding surgical approach, cancer type, and cytopathological findings. To identify factors associated with survival, we utilized Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results: All patients had tumors documented in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, including lung (61.4%), breast (9.6%), gastrointestinal (9.0%), hematologic (3.6%), and other cancers (16.4%). Surgical approaches included mini-thoracotomy (67.5%) and thoracoscopy (32.5%). Postsurgical cytopathology confirmed malignancy in 94 cases (56.6%). Over a median follow-up duration of 50.0 months, 142 deaths and 16 PE recurrences occurred. The 1-year overall and PE recurrence-free survival rates were 31.4% and 28.6%, respectively. One-year survival rates were significantly higher for thoracoscopy recipients (43.7% vs. 25.6%, p=0.031) and patients with negative cytopathology results (45.1% vs. 20.6%, p<0.001). No significant survival difference was observed between lung cancer and other types (p=0.129). Multivariate analysis identified New York Heart Association class, cancer stage, and cytopathology as independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: This series is the largest to date concerning window formation among cancer patients with PE. Patients' long-term survival after surgery was generally unfavorable. However, cases with negative cytopathology or earlier tumor stage demonstrated comparatively high survival rates.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.375-380
• /
• 2010

배경: 심장의 원발성 종양은 아주 드문 질환이다. 이중 대부분의 경우는 양성인 점액종이고 이는 조기의 수술적인 치료로 거의 완치되는 반면 육종과 같은 악성종양은 수술적 제거가 어렵고 예후도 안 좋은 것으로 알려져 있다. 본원에서는 심장 종양으로 수술적인 치료를 했던 환자를 모아서 분석해 보았다. 대상 및 방법: 1993년 8월부터 2008년 12월까지 심장 종양으로 수술적인 치료를 하였던 28명의 환자를 대상으로 의무 기록 검토를 통한 후향적 분석을 하였다. 결과: 환자의 연령은 20세에서 76세 사이로 평균 $54.2{\pm}15.6$세였다. 남자가 11명(39%), 여자가 17명(61%)이었다. 15예(54%)에서 심부전의 증상 호전을 위해 응급 수술을 시행하였다. 술 전 주 증상은 호흡곤란이 15예(54%)로 제일 많았다. 전 환자에서 술 전 심장초음파로 진단이 되었다. 수술 시 종양의 크기는 장축이 2∼40 cm의 범위로 평균 $7.0{\pm}6.9$ cm였으며 종양의 부착부위는 18예(64%)에서 심방중격에, 9예(32%)에서 좌심방에, 2예(7%)에서 승모판막윤에, 2예(7%)에서 좌심실에 위치하고 있었다. 수술은 전 환자에서 양 심방절개를 통해 접근하였고 25예(89%)에서 완전절제가 가능하였다. 조직검사에서 육종이 4예(14%), 지방종이 1예(4%), 점액종이 23예(82%)였으며 완전절제를 못했던 3예는 모두 육종이었다. 술 후 사망은 없었다. 외래 추적은 24예(86%)에서 가능했으며 평균 추적 기간은 $46.8{\pm}42.7$개월이었다. 추적 환자 중 만기 사망은 조직검사에서 육종이었던 3명이 있었다. 육종으로 수술했던 환자로 재발 혹은 타 조직으로 전이하여 1예에서 2차례 재수술, 1예에서 전이 부위 절제술, 1예에서는 항암치료만을 했던 환자였다. 평균 재발 및 전이기간은 각각 $12.7{\pm}10.8$개월, $20.5{\pm}16.8$개월이었다. 결론: 심장 종양의 대부분인 점액종은 색전 등의 위험을 야기할 수 있으므로 조기에 수술함이 원칙이고 수술적 제거로 근본적인 치료가 가능하다. 악성종양인 육종은 발견 시 이미 상당히 진행되어 있는 경우가 많고 주위 조직으로의 침윤이 심해 수술적인 제거가 어려운 경우가 많다. 그러나 심부전 증상 등의 증상완화를 위해서는 가능한 부위의 절제를 함으로써 환자의 향후 삶의 질을 높일 수 있는 방편으로 보인다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.222-227
• /
• 2013

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate prognostic factors for survival from first relapse (SFFR) in stage I-III breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: From June 1994 to June 2008, 3,835 patients were treated with surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer at Samsung Medical Center. Among them, a total of 224 patients died by June 2009, and 175 deaths were of breast cancer. Retrospective review was performed on medical records of 165 patients who met the inclusion criteria of this study. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done on survivals according to variables, such as age, stage, hormone status of tumor, disease-free interval (DFI), sites of first failure, number of organs involved by recurrent disease (NOR), application of salvage treatments, and existence of brain or liver metastasis (visceral metastasis). Results: Patients' median overall survival time was 38 months (range, 8 to 123 months). Median SFFR was 17 months (range, 5 to 87 months). Ninety percent of deaths occurred within 40 months after first recurrence. The patients with SFFR ${\leq}1$ year had tendency of triple-negativity, shorter DFI (${\leq}2$ years), larger NOR (>3), visceral metastasis for first relapse than the patients with SFFR >1 year. In multivariate analysis, longer DFI (>2 vs. ${\leq}2$ years), absence of visceral metastasis, and application of salvage treatments were statistically significant prognosticators for longer SFFR. Conclusion: The DFI, application of salvage treatments, and visceral metastasis were significant prognostic factors for SFFR in breast cancer patients.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.179-187
• /
• 2015

환자가 죽음에 임박했을 때 환자, 보호자, 의사 사이에서 심폐소생술에 대한 논의는 피할 수 없는 주제이다. 환자가 회복 불가능한 말기의 암환자인 경우에는 환자의 품위 있는 죽음을 고려하여 심폐소생술을 시행하지 않음(Do-not-resuscitate, DNR)을 결정하게 된다. 그러나 DNR에 대한 선택은 환자와 보호자의 심폐소생술과 DNR의 의미 및 그 결과에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 한다. DNR에 대하여 환자, 보호자, 의료진이 상담을 할 때는 환자의 질환이 더 이상 치료가 불가능하며, 심폐소생술이 환자의 생명을 연장시키는 것이 아니라 죽음의 과정을 연장시키는 것이며, 심폐소생술 이후에 삶의 질이 급격히 나빠질 수 있는 상황이라는 합의가 필요하다. 충분한 이해는 환자 또는 보호자가 품위 있는 죽음을 위한 DNR을 선택하도록 한다. 국내에서는 DNR 자체 보다는 이미 생명유지장치를 가지고 있는 환자에서의 생명유지장치의 제거에 대한 법적인 문제가 2차례 발생하면서 사회적으로 품위 있는 죽음에 대한 일반 대중의 관심이 이전보다 증가하였다. 환자와 의료진을 대상으로 한 설문에서는 DNR에 대한 인식과 의지가 80년대에 비해 2000년대 초반에 이르러 상당히 증가하였으나, 실제 의료 현장에서는 DNR의 결정에 있어 환자가 직접 관여를 하는 경우는 많지 않았고 DNR 작성 시점과 사망 시점과의 시간 간격이 1주 이내로 환자가 관여를 하거나 임종시기의 의료를 결정하기에는 너무 짧은 문제가 있었다. 이러한 문제는 조기 완화의료의 확산을 통하여 개선이 가능할 것으로 생각된다. 일부에서는 DNR이라는 용어보다는 자연적인 죽음을 허용함(Allow-Natural-Death)이라는 용어로 바꾸어서 설명하는 것이 이해를 돕고 선택의 갈등을 줄인다는 보고를 하여 DNR 논의와 결정에 있어서 적절한 시기 이외에도 환자와 보호자에게 많은 어려움이 있다는 것을 보여 주고 있다. DNR은 말기암환자에서 품위 있는 죽음을 위해 고려해야 하는 사항이며, 임상에서 DNR이 잘 시행되도록 임상적, 제도적 노력이 필요하다.