• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.56-59
• /
• 2004

The hamstring tendons are popular for autografts in a variety of reconstructive procedures. The hamstring autografts are used widely for its potential advantages over the patella bone-tendon-bone(BTB) autograft, including lower graft site morbidity and easier harvesting technique. However, the use of hamstrings has potential disadvantages such as the damage of infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve, premature tendon amputation, and tendon split following inadequate hamstring identifications. In our studies, we used modified technique for harvesting the hamstring to decrease potential disadvantages. Reflected hamstring flap method seems to be easy and safe in avoiding nerve damage and tendon splitting. We recommend the reflected hamstring flap method for harvesting hamstring tendons.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.72-80
• /
• 1997

Numerous techniques of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been described in literature. All have inherent advantages and disadvantages. The central one-third patellar tendon and hamstring tendons are the most commonly used autogenous tissues for replacement of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Although the central one-third patellar tendon is considered to be 'the gold standard' for replacement of torn ACL. equivalent results have been reported using hamstring tendon grafts. Autogenous hamstring grafts provide adequate strength while avoiding donor site morbidity associated with bone-tendon-bone harvest. $EndoButton^{\circledR}$ femoral fixation allows precise femoral tunnel placement without a second incison. The purpose of this article is to describe surgical techniques using a quadrupled semitendinosus tendon and $EndoButton^{\circledR}$ fixation, and review the results of replacement of ACL.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.92-101
• /
• 2010

The Hamstring autograft and the bone patellar bone tendon autograft have been widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In recent years, use of hamstring autograft for ACL reconstrution has been increased. The reason seems to be the advantages of the hamstring tendon such as high ultimate tensile load, low donor site morbidity and development of graft fixation method. These theoretical advantages have been increased as studies have shown that hamstring tendons actually regenerate after harvesting for ACL reconstruction. However, the concerns have arisen regarding the disadvantages of hamstring harvest, which were weakness of tibial internal rotation, the loss of flexion strength. The flexion strength loss has been controversial, therefore it needs to study whether restoration of flexion strength after hamstring regeneration is or not. In this study, we reviewed the current research of concerns on the advantage and disadvantage of hamstring tendon autograft and the hamstring regeneration. Furthermore, we compared the earlier studies and experiences regarding Hamstring regeneration with our research.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.167-173
• /
• 2005

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterolateral structure (PLS) reconstruction using bilateral hamstring tendon autografts. Materials and Methods: From October 2002 to March 2004, ten patients were received PCL and PLS reconstruction simultaneously using bilateral hamstring autografts. PCL was reconstructed using ipsilateral hamstring tendon and fixed with cross pins and Intrafix (Mitek, Norwood, MA). PLS was reconstructed using contralateral hamstring tendon. The mean follow up was 17 months. Clinical assessments consisted of Lysholm knee scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation form and posterior stress radiographs. External rotation of tibia was evaluated at $30^{\circ}\;and\;90^{\circ}$ knee flexion using Noyes and Barber-Westin's classification. Contralateral harvest site morbity was evaluated using IKDC evaluation form and flexion power of the knee. Results: Mean posterior displacement of tibia using stress radiographs was improved from 13.3 mm to 3.7 mm. In tibial external rotation evaluation, 7 patients were functional, 2 patients were partially functional and one failure. The average Lysholm knee score improved from 54 preoperatively to 86 postoperatively. At the final IKDC evaluation, 8 patients were graded as nearly normal, 2 were graded as abnormal. In contralateral harvest site morbidity evaluation, 2 patients complained of numbness around the wound but negligible. Conclusion: PCL and PLS reconstruction using bilateral hamstring autografts was considered as a good treatment method with minimal contralateral harvest site morbidity.