• 동아시아경상학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.43-54
• /
• 2022

Purpose - Government-funded research institutes are important national institutions socially and nationally but academic studies on Korean government-funded research institutes are scarce, especially in areas of human resources and organization. This study investigated the effects of job characteristics on organizational commitment, resilience, and organizational citizenship behavior for organizational members of government-funded research institutes in the field of science and technology. Research design, data, and methodology - Literature review on the effects of job characteristics on organizational commitment, resilience and organizational citizenship behavior for organizational members of government-funded research institutes in the field of science and technology. Based on the review, exploratory propositions were proposed to conduct future empirical study. Result - In this study, based on the results of previous studies, it was presumed that job characteristics would affect organizational commitment, and organizational commitment would affect resilience and organizational citizenship behavior. In addition, proposition on the mediating role of resilience on both organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior was formulated. Conclusion - It was propositioned that job characteristics would affect organizational commitment, and organizational commitment would affect resilience and organizational citizenship behavior. Resilience, along with the direct effect of organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behavior, would play a role in mediating organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제50권4호
• /
• pp.665-677
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status and investigate relevant indicators so that R&D performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes can proceed. A suitable performance evaluation model was presented based on the surveyed indicators. Based on the presented performance evaluation model, the importance was analyzed to calculate the weight for each indicator of the performance evaluation model. Methods: The method applied in this study presented a performance evaluation model based on the organizational performance evaluation cases of advanced overseas countries. By using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, the weight of each indicator of the performance evaluation model was studied. Results: As a result of examining the indicators necessary for the evaluation model, focusing on overseas cases, 13 evaluation items were derived. A weight was calculated for the importance of the study results. And the scientific/technical research results showed the highest excellence. Conclusion: Key indicators of performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes were derived and presented through detailed modeling in three stages. A realistic model that can objectively evaluate the performance of government-funded research institutes was proposed using the AHP technique.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2008

The enormous budget of government and manpower are invested to the government funded institutes every year. The R&D investment focused on input has to be turned toward the investment based on the effectiveness of R&D activities. Measuring the efficiency of research activities is required in order to evaluate the effectiveness of R&D investment in these institutes. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the relative efficiency of research activities performed in 19 government funded research institutes. CCR/BCC model and DEA/AR model were applied to get the relative efficiency of 19 institutes. Assurance regions for the weight of output attributes were obtained by using the underlined concept of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We used input and output data items describing research activity of 19 government funded research institutes. The results of this study are expected to become a basis of the R&D investment decision of the government.

• 한국산업융합학회 논문집
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2022

A systematic support system that develops technology support policies for SMEs (Small and Medium sized Enterprises) and solves technical problems faced by SMEs will increase the productivity and competitiveness of SMEs. To this end, it is necessary to identify the types and level of technology required for SMEs, and to find ways to utilize the technologies possessed by government-funded research institutes leading technology development. It is important to develop a new production technology and to establish a cooperation system between SMEs and government- funded research institutes to solve various pending problems.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보통신학회 2017년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.587-590
• /
• 2017

본 논문에서는 사이버 침해 위협 빈도가 점점 증가하고 있는 정부출연연구기관의 정보보안 현황 및 문제점을 조사하여 정보보안에 대한 중요성을 강조하고, 정부출연연구기관 간의 정보보안 비교분석을 통해 개선방안을 마련하고자 한다. 이를 위해 정부출연연구기관의 정보보안 정책, 조직, 예산 등 정보보안과 관련된 데이터를 바탕으로 문제점을 파악하고 개선방안을 제안하여 향후 정부출연연구기관의 안정적인 정보보안 인프라 구축 기반을 마련하는데 기여하고자 한다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.171-189
• /
• 2011

KAs information and knowledge are increasingly becoming more important in the knowledge-driven society, knowledge management, as a very important management paradigm, is securing firm position in private and public sectors. Complying with this paradigm, government-funded research institutes in science-technology sector are actively utilizing knowledge management by employing knowledge management system and evaluating its applications' performance. The purpose of this study is to develop evaluation items and measurement indices to rationally measure knowledge management performance of the government-funded research institutes and to verify the feasibility of applying these evaluation items and indices. To achieve this research goal, the evaluation model of knowledge management performance was constructed by reviewing and integrating the existing studies, and subsequently, evaluation areas, evaluation items, measurement indices were derived from this evaluation model. Also, the feasibility analysis on the evaluation items and measurement indices was performed by means of FGI(Focus Group Interview) with the knowledge management experts belonging to Korean government-funded institutions in science-technology sector. The implications of this study are as follows : in theoretical perspective, this study has proposed a criterion frame to evaluate knowledge management performance, and has rationally drawn evaluation items and measurement indices from the criterion frame. And in practical perspective, this study has improved the validity and practicality of the measurement indices, which can lead to more reasonable and easier evaluation of knowledge management performance of the government-funded research institutes.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.84-92
• /
• 2020

In order to analyze the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, four independent variables (organization size, organization age, evaluation system, organization location) and goal ambiguity were empirically analyzed. Although there are existing studies on institutional evaluation, which is the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, there are differences in research in that it is an empirical analysis analyzed from the perspective of goal ambiguity and that the evaluation system, which is the specificity of institutional evaluation, is included in the analysis. As a result of the analysis, organizational location was the only independent variable that had a direct significant effect on organizational performance, and goal ambiguity showed a significant mediating effect for all independent variables. This indicates that goal ambiguity plays an important role in the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, and to reduce this, increase the size of the organization, pay attention to establishment of the organization for organizational age, and that it is desirable to have an independent research group in the government department for the organization location. In addition, it was supported that the improvement effect of the evaluation system is proceeding in a desirable direction in terms of goal ambiguity.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2017년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1213-1244
• /
• 2017

This study used a resource-based perspective to analyse the effects of organizational composition on the R&D performance of science and technology government-funded research institutes (GFRIs). We assumed that the composition of each GFRI would eventually be regarded as absorptive capacity and act as a moderating variable between R&D investment and performance. We used a panel generalized least squares (GLS) model with fixed effects to analyse panel data from 115 Korean GFRIs between 2011 and 2015. Our findings show that R&D investment of GFRIs has a direct and positive effect on performance. We also analysed how organizational composition can moderate the effect of R&D investment on performance. The findings provide evidence that organizational composition plays a moderating role between R&D investment and performance. Finally, this study discusses policy implications, its limitations, and also highlights future research directions.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.51-68
• /
• 2015

The objective of this study is to empirically examine the relationship between creativity and performance in 10 government- funded research institutes of industrial science and technology. In order to analyze the relationship, the institutes are categorized into the high performance group and the low performance group based on research paper and patents The study uses discriminant analysis to identify the factors causing the difference between the two groups. The results show that there is no significant difference of individual creativity between the two groups whereas there is significant difference of group creativity and organization creativity. The study suggests that performance of government-funded research institutes depends on group and organizational creativity.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제66호
• /
• pp.105-155
• /
• 2020

연구기록은 그 관리의 중대한 필요성에도 불구하고 연구기록의 정의와 범위, 연구기록의 관리 주체 등 관리의 핵심요소에 대한 논란이 많은 기록유형이다. 연구기록은 관리하기 까다롭다는 이유로 사각지대에 방치되어 왔으나, 이를 잘 관리한다면 나중에 무한한 이차적 활용이 가능한 잠재적 가치가 큰 기록으로 평가되고 있다. 특히 정부출연연구기관은 연구기관이자 공공기관으로서 이러한 연구기록을 체계적으로 관리해야 하는 책임이 있다. 이에 본 연구는 정부출연연구기관 연구기록의 체계적인 관리를 위해 연구기록 평가의 필요성을 환기시키고 국내 정부출연연구기관에서 근무하는 기록연구사 11명과 인터뷰를 진행함으로써 정부출연연구기관의 현재 연구기록 관리 및 평가 현황을 파악하였다. 그 결과로 연구기록의 평가의 개선방안을 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 우선 현행 기록 평가체계의 관점에서 이를 연구기록 평가체계에 그대로 적용하는 것은 실효성의 문제가 있음을 지적하였다. 이에 연구기록의 특성과 가치를 고려한 평가가 필요하다고 보았으며 연구기록의 평가목적, 평가의 주체, 평가방식, 평가시점, 평가도구 및 평가기준이 지향해야 할 방안을 제안하였다.