• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제21권9호
• /
• pp.125-131
• /
• 2021

Detecting fraudulent insurance claims is difficult due to small and unbalanced data. Some research has been carried out to better cope with various types of fraudulent claims. Nowadays, technology for detecting fraudulent insurance claims has been increasingly utilized in insurance and technology fields, thanks to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in addition to traditional statistical detection and rule-based methods. This study obtained meaningful results for a fraudulent insurance claim detection model based on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) technologies, using fraudulent insurance claim data from previous research. In our search for a method to enhance the detection of fraudulent insurance claims, we investigated the reinforcement learning (RL) method. We examined how we could apply the RL method to the detection of fraudulent insurance claims. There are limited previous cases of applying the RL method. Thus, we first had to define the RL essential elements based on previous research on detecting anomalies. We applied the deep Q-network (DQN) and double deep Q-network (DDQN) in the learning fraudulent insurance claim detection model. By doing so, we confirmed that our model demonstrated better performance than previous machine learning models.

• 사물인터넷융복합논문지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 우리나라에서 매년 증가하고 있는 노인장기요양기관의 부당청구 맥락과 부당청구 예방을 위한 대책들이 어떠한지를 탐색하기 위해서 언론기사를 활용한 텍스트 마이닝 분석을 실시하였다. 기사는 뉴스 빅테이터 분석 시스템인 빅카인즈에서 수집하였고, 수집기간은 노인장기요양보험이 시행된 2008년 7월부터 2022년 2월 28일까지로 약 15년간이다. 이 기간 동안 '노인요양+부당청구', '장기요양+부당청구', 등의 키워드로 총 2,627개의 기사가 수집되었고, 이중 중복된 기사를 제외한 총 946개가 선정되었다. 본 연구의 텍스트마이닝 분석결과로 첫째, 모든 구간(2008.7.1-2022.2.28)에서 가장 높은 빈도로 언급된 상위 10위 키워드는 노인장기요양기관, 부당청구, 국민건강보험공단, 노인장기요양보험, 장기요양급여(비용), 노인요양시설, 보건복지부, 노인, 신고, 포상금(지급)의 순으로 나타났다. 둘째, N-gram 분석결과 장기요양급여(비용)과 부당청구, 부당청구와 노인장기요양기관, 허위와 부당청구, 신고와 포상금(지급), 노인장기요양기관과 신고 등의 순으로 나타났다. 셋째, TF-IDF 분석은 빈도분석의 결과와 유사하게 나타났지만, 신고, 포상금(지급), 증가 등은 순위가 상승하였다. 상기 분석결과를 바탕으로 노인장기요양기관 부당청구 예방을 위한 방향성을 제시하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제53권
• /
• pp.207-229
• /
• 2012

In IP 7 and LCCP 201, Law Commission considers the insured's duty of good faith after the formation of the contract. This article intends to review and analyse the legal implications of proposals in IP 7 and LCCP 201. The results of analysis are following. First, Law Commission propose to end the remedy of avoidance under MIA 1906 section 17, because avoidance of past claims is unprincipled, impractical and unnecessarily harsh. Secondly, LC proposes that an insured who makes a fraudulent claim should forfeit the whole claim which the fraud relates, but that the fraud should not invalidate previous and legitimate claims. Thirdly, LC proposes to introduce a statutory right for the insurer to claim damages for the reasonable, foreseeable costs of investigate a fraudulent claim in specific circumstances and that damages would be limited to those cases where the insurer can show an actual, net loss. Finally, LC provisionally propose that an express fraud clause should be upheld in business insurance, whereas in consumer insurance, any term which purports to give the insurer greater rights in relation to fraudulent claims that those set out in statute would be of no effect.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제67권
• /
• pp.119-142
• /
• 2015

Many insurers have traditionally incorporated "fraud clauses" into insurance policies, setting out the consequences of making a fraudulent claim. Even in the absence of an express terms, English courts provide insurers with a remedy for a fraudulent claim. However, the law in this area is complex, convoluted and confused. English Law Commission think that the law in this area needs to be reformed for three reasons; (1) the disjunctive between the common law rule and section 17 generates unnecessary disputes and litigation, (2) increasingly, UK commercial law must be justified to an international insurance society, and (3) the rules on fraudulent claims are functioned as a deterrent if they are clear and well-understood. In order for these purposes, English Law Commission recommends a statutory regime to the effect that, when an insured commits fraud in relation to a claim, the insurer should (1) have no liability to pay the fraudulent claim and be able to recover any sums already paid in respect to the claim, and (2) have the option to treat the contract as having been terminated with from the time of the fraudulent act and, if chosen the option, be entitled to refuse all claims arising after the fraud, but (3) remain liable for legitimate losses before the fraudulent act. LC is not recommending a complete restatement of the law on insurance fraud generally. For example, LC does not seek to define fraud, instead, recommends the introduction of targeted provisions to confirm the remedies available to an insurer who discovers a fraud by a policyholder.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.163-177
• /
• 2024

연구배경: 본 연구는 부당청구 예방형 자율점검제 시범사업의 "개선요청 통보 및 모니터링" 중재활동이 의료기관의 중재 실시 전과 후 청구건수와 청구총진료비 청구행태에 있어서의 변화를 검증하고자 하였다. 방법: 자료는 건강보험심사평가원의 2021년 7월부터 2022년 2월까지 시범사업 항목인 '정맥 내 일시주사(KK020)'를 청구한 기관 중 예방형 자율점검제 대상기관으로 선정된 1,129개 의료기관의 청구자료와 신고 현황자료를 활용하였다. 비교 대상을 선정하기 위해 1:3 비율로 성향점수매칭을 사용하였고, 청구행태 변화를 검증하기 위해 대응표본 t-검정과 t-검정을 실시하였다. 또한 청구행태 변화에 차이가 있는 경우 이에 영향을 미치는 요인분석을 위하여 회귀분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 중재 실시 전과 후의 청구행태는 실험군의 모든 의료기관 종별에서 청구건수와 청구총진료비가 유의하게 감소하였고, 의원의 대조군에서는 유의한 증가를 보였다. 의료기관 및 의사 특성에 따른 중재 실시 전·후 청구행태는 실험군은 의원의 의사 연령 40세 미만을 제외하고 모든 종별에서 유의하게 감소하였다. 대조군은 종합병원과 병원은 개원기간에서, 의원은 표시과목에서 일부 유의한 감소가 있었고, 의사 50세 이상 남성에서 유의하게 증가한 것으로 나타났다. 실험군 대상 의료기관의 청구행태에 변화에 대한 회귀분석 결과, 모든 종별에서 중재 실시 전과 후에 청구건수와 청구총진료비가 유의하게 감소하였다. 또한 의료기관과 의사 특성에서 병원은 개원기간이 길수록 유의한 증가를 나타났고, 의원은 소재지역과 표시과목(기타)에서 유의한 감소를 보였다. 결론: 실험군의 부당청구 예방형 자율점검제의 중재 실시 이후 청구경향의 변화가 연구가설대로 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 이는 제도 시행 직후에 의료기관 스스로 청구행태를 개선하고, 교정하는 사전예방적 활동의 효과가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대조군에서도 통보 대상기관 위주의 제도운영방식에도 불구하고 일부 유의한 감소가 나타난 것은 예방형 자율점검제의 간접적인 효과로 볼 수 있다. 따라서 비대상기관에도 청구행태 개선활동이 이루어질 수 있도록 적극적인 홍보와 교육, 간담회 등의 추가적인 지원과 지속적인 모니터링이 필요하다. 이를 통해 부당청구가 감소될 수 있도록 예방형 자율점검제를 확대하는 것이 바람직하다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제69권
• /
• pp.407-426
• /
• 2016

The Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MIA 1906) has been a successful piece of legislation, having rarely been amended and having established, or served as an influence in the development of, the basis of marine insurance legislation in several countries. However, it has been recognised that some parts of the MIA 1906 have begun to show their antiquated nature, especially where established principles which were once thought to reflect undoubted propositions of law are now being openly criticised. Since 2006, the Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission (the 'Law Commissions') have been engaged in a major review of insurance contract law, finally leading to the Insurance Act 2015. The Insurance Act 2015 received Royal Assent on 12 February 2015, and was based primarily on the joint recommendations of the Law Commissions. The 2015 Act made substantial changes to several main areas of marine insurance law & practice: (i) the replacement of the pre-contractual duty of disclosure with a duty to make a "fair presentation of the risk"; (ii) the abolition of the "insurance warranty" under the Marine Insurance Act 1906, s.33, and provision of a new default remedy of suspension of liability until the breach is cured; (iii) partial codification of the fraudulent claims rule in insurance contract law, etc. The Act did not provide for any new statutory duty for insurers to investigate or pay claims in a timely fashion, although this may be revisited in the next Parliament. Moreover, the Law Commissions have reopened their consideration of the doctrine of insurable interest. The 2015Actmay not then signal the end of the legislative programme in this area.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제47권
• /
• pp.129-156
• /
• 2010

Since the 1970s, international construction employers have commonly requested first demand guarantees upon their contractors as a form of security for due performance of their works. Contractors prefer the greater protection offered by more traditional forms of security requiring presentation of an arbitral award or other evidence of the caller's entitlement to compensation. Many contractors nonetheless feel that they have no alternative but to provide these unconditional guarantees in order to compete. However, these unconditional first demand guarantees are controversial and have given rise to numerous disputes both in arbitration and litigation. Disputes arising from first demand guarantees can be broken down into a) applications to prevent a perceived fraudulent or otherwise unfair or improper calling of a guarantee, b) claims arising from such abusive calls and c) claims relating to the consequences of such calls even if the call itself may not be abusive as such. The contractors should carefully assess the risk of an abusive call being made bearing in mind the difficulties he may face in seeking to prevent such a call. He should also bear in mind the difficulties, delays and cost he is likely to encounter in seeking to recover any monies wrongfully called. One option would be to provide that the call can only be made once and to the extent that the employer's damages have been assessed or even incurred or even for the default to have been established by an arbitral tribunal or court. Another option would be to provide that any call be accompanied by a decision of a competent and impartial third party stating that the contractor is in breach. For example, such a requirement could be incorporated into a construction contract based on the FIDIC Conditions by submitting this decision to a Dispute Adjudication Board. Another option would be to provide for the "ICC Counter-Guarantee Scheme". In sum, there would appear to be room for compromise between the employer and the contractor in respect of first demand guarantees by conditioning the entitlement to call such guarantees to the determination of a competent and impartial third party.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.137-177
• /
• 2007

The medical expenses review system in Korea has developed under fee-for-service system with its own unique structure. The importance of reviewing medical expenses has been emphasized, as the size of medical expenditures moving through the health insurance legal context and its weight in the national economy have increased very rapidly. It is, however, analyzed that the feuds and arguments continue among the stakeholders for the lack of laws supporting the medical expenses review system. The medical expenses review is a series of administrative procedures, deciding whether claims from medical care institutions to the insurer are legal and valid or not. It mainly controls the increase of unnecessarily excessive health insurance claim and prevents fraudulent claim and abuse and checks the less use or unsuitable use of medical resources. It also works a function guarantees medical benefits for the appropriate treatment according to the object of health insurance system as a social insurance scheme. The dispute on legal base of the medical expenses review is about the source of law in the medical expenses review. There are the Health Insurance Act and administrative laws as jus scriptum and the guidelines of review as administrative orders. The medical expenses review should reflect various factors, such as the development of medical healthcare technologies, the health expenditures distribution, the financial situation of the health insurance, and the evaluation on the level of appropriate benefits. It is also likely to adapt to the traits of characters of medicine, and trends and transition, Besides it should judge the legality and the validity of medical benefits expenditures by synthesizing these all factors. And the evaluation system of appropriateness of medical benefits was administrative procedure which was consecutive with reviewing the medical expenses system and it was intended to make up for the result of reviewing the medical expenses in more comprehensive levels.