• 제목/요약/키워드: Fishing fisheries

검색결과 1,592건 처리시간 0.023초

정치망 어구어법의 개발에 관한 연구-I - 현용어구의 흐름에 대한 형상 변화 - (A Study on Improvement for Fishing Gear and Method of Pound Net - I - Net Shapes of the Commerical Net in the Flow -)

  • 윤일부;이주희;권병국;조영복;유제범;김성훈;김부영
    • 수산해양기술연구
    • /
    • 제40권4호
    • /
    • pp.268-281
    • /
    • 2004
  • 본 연구는 실제 정치망 어장에서의 조류에 따른 어구 형상 변형을 추정하고, 그 변형을 최소화시키며 어구의 기본 기능을 유지시키는데 필요한 수중 현상과 어구 내부용적을 적절하게 유지할 수 있는 설계의 기본 자료를 얻기 위한 목적으로 회류 수조에서 모형실험을 실시하였으며, 흐름에 따른 대뜸의 멍줄에 작용하는 장력, 정치망 내의 유속변화와 그물형상의 변화를 측정하였다. 1. 유속이 0.0m/s에서 0.6m/s로 증가 할 때에 유속 (v)에 따른 장력(R)의 실험식은 운동장 조상의 경우 R=$19.58v^{1.98}$($r^2$=0.98) 원통 조상인 경우, R=$26.90v^{1.72}$($r^2$=0.95)이었다. 2. 유속변화는 흐름이 망내부를 통과함에 따라 감소하여 운동장이 조상인 경우, 제1원통내부에서 0.1m/s일 때 약 70%, 0.2m/s일 때 60%, 0.3m/s일 때 약 50%, 0.4~0.6m/s에서는 약 40%정도로 초기유속에 비해 감소하였다. 원통이 조상측일 경우, 제2원통을 통과한 흐름은 초기 유속의 약 30~60%로 급격히 감소하였고, 제1원통에서는 약 20~30% 비탈그물에서는 약 10~20%정도 감소하였고, 운동장내에서 다시 유속이 증가하였다. 3. 운동장이 흐름의 조상측인 경우, 운동장그물의 기울기 변화량은 0~70$^{\circ}$까지, 비탈그물은 0~63$^{\circ}$까지 변화하였고, 조하측인 제2원통은 0~47$^{\circ}$까지 변화하였다. 유속이 증가함에 따른 까래그물의 깊이 변화는 초기 깊이에 보다 제1원통과 제2원통이 약 0~45%정도, 비탈그물이 약 0~37% 정도로 감소하였다. 4. 원통이 흐름의 조상측인 경우, 제2원통의 기울기 변화량은 약 0~70$^{\circ}$까지, 비탈그물은 약 0~55$^{\circ}$까지, 조하측인 운동장은 0~50$^{\circ}$까지 였다. 까래그물의 깊이 변화는 초기 깊이와 비교해서 제1원통은 약 0~35%, 제2원통은 약 0~20%, 비탈그물은 약 0~35%까지 감소하였으며, 유속이 0.5m/s이상에서 비탈그물이 원통 입구까지 부상하여, 원통 입구를 90%이상 막았다. 5. 어구의 변형을 최소화하고 전개용적을 증가시키기 위해서는 입구 및 운동장 부분에서는 힘출의 저조시 수심 위치에 중량추를 부착하고, 운동장 바깥쪽과 제1원통의 섶장과 까래그물 제2원통의 바깥쪽, 비탈그물의 까래에 부가 중량추를 부착하는 것이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.

일본 어류 양식업의 발전과정과 산지교체에 관한 연구 : 참돔양식업을 사례로 (A study on Development Process of Fish Aquaculture in Japan - Case by Seabream Aquaculture -)

  • 송정헌
    • 수산경영론집
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.75-90
    • /
    • 2003
  • When we think of fundamental problems of the aquaculture industry, there are several strict conditions, and consequently the aquaculture industry is forced to change. Fish aquaculture has a structural supply surplus in production, aggravation of fishing grounds, stagnant low price due to recent recession, and drastic change of distribution circumstances. It is requested for us to initiate discussion on such issue as “how fish aquaculture establishes its status in the coastal fishery\ulcorner, will fish aquaculture grow in the future\ulcorner, and if so “how it will be restructured\ulcorner” The above issues can be observed in the mariculture of yellow tail, sea scallop and eel. But there have not been studied concerning seabream even though the production is over 30% of the total production of fish aquaculture in resent and it occupied an important status in the fish aquaculture. The objectives of this study is to forecast the future movement of sea bream aquaculture. The first goal of the study is to contribute to managerial and economic studies on the aquaculture industry. The second goal is to identify the factors influencing the competition between production areas and to identify the mechanisms involved. This study will examine the competitive power in individual producing area, its behavior, and its compulsory factors based on case study. Producing areas will be categorized according to following parameters : distance to market and availability of transportation, natural environment, the time of formation of producing areas (leaderㆍfollower), major production items, scale of business and producing areas, degree of organization in production and sales. As a factor in shaping the production area of sea bream aquaculture, natural conditions especially the water temperature is very important. Sea bream shows more active feeding and faster growth in areas located where the water temperature does not go below 13∼14$^{\circ}C$ during the winter. Also fish aquaculture is constrained by the transporting distance. Aquacultured yellowtail is a mass-produced and a mass-distributed item. It is sold a unit of cage and transported by ship. On the other hand, sea bream is sold in small amount in markets and transported by truck; so, the transportation cost is higher than yellow tail. Aquacultured sea bream has different product characteristics due to transport distance. We need to study live fish and fresh fish markets separately. Live fish was the original product form of aquacultured sea bream. Transportation of live fish has more constraints than the transportation of fresh fish. Death rate and distance are highly correlated. In addition, loading capacity of live fish is less than fresh fish. In the case of a 10 ton truck, live fish can only be loaded up to 1.5 tons. But, fresh fish which can be placed in a box can be loaded up to 5 to 6 tons. Because of this characteristics, live fish requires closer location to consumption area than fresh fish. In the consumption markets, the size of fresh fish is mainly 0.8 to 2kg.Live fish usually goes through auction, and quality is graded. Main purchaser comes from many small-sized restaurants, so a relatively small farmer and distributer can sell it. Aquacultured sea bream has been transacted as a fresh fish in GMS ,since 1993 when the price plummeted. Economies of scale works in case of fresh fish. The characteristics of fresh fish is as follows : As a large scale demander, General Merchandise Stores are the main purchasers of sea bream and the size of the fish is around 1.3kg. It mainly goes through negotiation. Aquacultured sea bream has been established as a representative food in General Merchandise Stores. GMS require stable and mass supply, consistent size, and low price. And Distribution of fresh fish is undertook by the large scale distributers, which can satisfy requirements of GMS. The market share in Tokyo Central Wholesale Market shows Mie Pref. is dominating in live fish. And Ehime Pref. is dominating in fresh fish. Ehime Pref. showed remarkable growth in 1990s. At present, the dealings of live fish is decreasing. However, the dealings of fresh fish is increasing in Tokyo Central Wholesale Market. The price of live fish is decreasing more than one of fresh fish. Even though Ehime Pref. has an ideal natural environment for sea bream aquaculture, its entry into sea bream aquaculture was late, because it was located at a further distance to consumers than the competing producing areas. However, Ehime Pref. became the number one producing areas through the sales of fresh fish in the 1990s. The production volume is almost 3 times the production volume of Mie Pref. which is the number two production area. More conversion from yellow tail aquaculture to sea bream aquaculture is taking place in Ehime Pref., because Kagosima Pref. has a better natural environment for yellow tail aquaculture. Transportation is worse than Mie Pref., but this region as a far-flung producing area makes up by increasing the business scale. Ehime Pref. increases the market share for fresh fish by creating demand from GMS. Ehime Pref. has developed market strategies such as a quick return at a small profit, a stable and mass supply and standardization in size. Ehime Pref. increases the market power by the capital of a large scale commission agent. Secondly Mie Pref. is close to markets and composed of small scale farmers. Mie Pref. switched to sea bream aquaculture early, because of the price decrease in aquacultured yellou tail and natural environmental problems. Mie Pref. had not changed until 1993 when the price of the sea bream plummeted. Because it had better natural environment and transportation. Mie Pref. has a suitable water temperature range required for sea bream aquaculture. However, the price of live sea bream continued to decline due to excessive production and economic recession. As a consequence, small scale farmers are faced with a market price below the average production cost in 1993. In such kind of situation, the small-sized and inefficient manager in Mie Pref. was obliged to withdraw from sea bream aquaculture. Kumamoto Pref. is located further from market sites and has an unsuitable nature environmental condition required for sea bream aquaculture. Although Kumamoto Pref. is trying to convert to the puffer fish aquaculture which requires different rearing techniques, aquaculture technique for puffer fish is not established yet.

  • PDF