• Journal of Nutrition and Health
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 1976

몇가지 식물성유지(植物性油脂)와 동물성유지(動物性油脂)의 영양가(營養價)를 비교평가(比較評價)하기 위하여 7종의 동(動), 식물유(植物油) 10%를 90% 기초사료(基礎館料)에 혼합한 시험식이(試驗食餌)를 쥐 32마리, 병아리 32마리에 4주간 섭취(攝取)시켜 성장률(成長率), 식이섭취량(食餌攝取量) 및 식이효율, 영양소이용율(營養素利用率), 질소축척율(窒素蓄積率), 혈청(血淸)콜레스테롤 함량(含量), 간지방함량(肝脂肪含量), 각 지방의 지방산(脂肪酸) 조성(造成)을 조사연구(調査硏究)해본 결과(結果) 아래와 같이 결론(結論)을 얻었다. 1. 성장률(成長率)은 각 처리구간에 통계적(統計的)인 유의차(留意差)는 인정(認定)되지 않았으나 쥐 실험(實驗)에서는 콩기름군, 채종유군, 옥수수 기름군, 동물성지방근의 증체량(增滯量)이 다른 시험군보다 좋았고 옥수수군과 동물성지방군이 병아리 실험(實驗)에서는 더 좋았다. 한편 지방 10%를 첨가한 군의 성장률(成長率)이 대조군보다 일반적으로 우수하였으나 병아리의 경우에 있어서 어유(魚油)군의 증체율(增滯率)은 좋지 않았다. 2. 식이섭취량(食餌攝取量)에 있어서는 쥐나 병아리에 있어서 공(共)히 옥수수 기름군이 가장 많았으며 어유(魚油)군의 섭취량(攝取量)이 두 실험동물(實驗動物) 다 가장낮았다. 이결과로 미루어 보면 어유(魚油)에는 식이의 기호성(嗜好性)을 저하(低下)시키는 인자(因子)가 들어 있든지 어떤 유독성분(有毒性分)이 함유(含有)되어 있을지 모른다. 식이효율면에서는 쥐 실험에서는 콩기름군, 병아리에 있어서는 윽수수 기름군이 가장 좋았으며 두 실험동물 다같이 대조군의 식이효율(食餌?率)이 가장 낮았으나 통계적(統計的)인 유의성(留意性)은 인정(認定)되지 않았다. 3. 영양소(營養素) 이용율중(利用率中) 지방이용율은 대체로 일반식이 내의 륵지방(肋脂肪)보다는 지방질(脂肪質) 첨가식이내(添加食餌內)의 륵지방(肋脂肪)이 흡수율(吸收率)이나 이용률(利用率)이 더 우수함을 보여주었고, 근소축적률(筋素蓄積率)은 쥐에 있어서는 어유(魚油)군이 73.5%, 병아리에 있어서는 채종유군이 52.1%로 가장 높았으며 또한 쥐에서는 참기름군이 66.0%, 병아리에서는 대조구가 33.4로 가장 낮았으나 각 구별 통계적(統計的)인 차이는 없었다. 4. 쥐 실험(實驗)에서만 실시된 간지방(肝脂防) 함량측정(含量測定)은 채종유군의 그것이 다른 군보다 높았으며 옥수수기름, 콩기름, 참기름, 들기름, 동물유, 어유의 순서였으나 통계적(統計的)인 유의성(留意性)은 인정(認定)되지 않았고 일반적(一般的)으로 식물성 유지급여군의 간지방함량(肝脂肪含量)이 다른 군보다 높았다. 5. 혈청(血淸)콜레스테롤 함량(含量)은 쥐에 있어서는 채종유군이 가장 높았으며 참기름군이 비교적(比較的) 높은 수치(數値)를 나타냈고, 병아리실험에서는 동물유군이 어유, 콩기름, 참기름, 들기름, 옥수수기름, 채종유, 대조군보다 높았으나 통계적(統計的)인 유의차(留意差)는 없었다.6. 지방산조성(脂肪酸造成)은 동물성유지는 대체로 palmitic acid, myristic acid함량이 많았으며 식물성유는 Linoleic acid 와 oleic acid가 많았고 옥수수기름이 필수지방산인 Linoleic acid 함량이 54.7%로 가장많았으며 특히 들기름이 2중 결합 3개인 Linolenic acid가 58.4%로 다른 식물성기름보다 월등히 높았다. 한편 식물성 기름에는 Arachidonic acid 가 소량있으나 동물유(動物油)나 어유(魚油)에서는 분석(分析)되지 못했다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.75-90
• /
• 2003

When we think of fundamental problems of the aquaculture industry, there are several strict conditions, and consequently the aquaculture industry is forced to change. Fish aquaculture has a structural supply surplus in production, aggravation of fishing grounds, stagnant low price due to recent recession, and drastic change of distribution circumstances. It is requested for us to initiate discussion on such issue as “how fish aquaculture establishes its status in the coastal fishery\ulcorner, will fish aquaculture grow in the future\ulcorner, and if so “how it will be restructured\ulcorner” The above issues can be observed in the mariculture of yellow tail, sea scallop and eel. But there have not been studied concerning seabream even though the production is over 30% of the total production of fish aquaculture in resent and it occupied an important status in the fish aquaculture. The objectives of this study is to forecast the future movement of sea bream aquaculture. The first goal of the study is to contribute to managerial and economic studies on the aquaculture industry. The second goal is to identify the factors influencing the competition between production areas and to identify the mechanisms involved. This study will examine the competitive power in individual producing area, its behavior, and its compulsory factors based on case study. Producing areas will be categorized according to following parameters : distance to market and availability of transportation, natural environment, the time of formation of producing areas (leaderㆍfollower), major production items, scale of business and producing areas, degree of organization in production and sales. As a factor in shaping the production area of sea bream aquaculture, natural conditions especially the water temperature is very important. Sea bream shows more active feeding and faster growth in areas located where the water temperature does not go below 13∼14$^{\circ}C$ during the winter. Also fish aquaculture is constrained by the transporting distance. Aquacultured yellowtail is a mass-produced and a mass-distributed item. It is sold a unit of cage and transported by ship. On the other hand, sea bream is sold in small amount in markets and transported by truck; so, the transportation cost is higher than yellow tail. Aquacultured sea bream has different product characteristics due to transport distance. We need to study live fish and fresh fish markets separately. Live fish was the original product form of aquacultured sea bream. Transportation of live fish has more constraints than the transportation of fresh fish. Death rate and distance are highly correlated. In addition, loading capacity of live fish is less than fresh fish. In the case of a 10 ton truck, live fish can only be loaded up to 1.5 tons. But, fresh fish which can be placed in a box can be loaded up to 5 to 6 tons. Because of this characteristics, live fish requires closer location to consumption area than fresh fish. In the consumption markets, the size of fresh fish is mainly 0.8 to 2kg.Live fish usually goes through auction, and quality is graded. Main purchaser comes from many small-sized restaurants, so a relatively small farmer and distributer can sell it. Aquacultured sea bream has been transacted as a fresh fish in GMS ,since 1993 when the price plummeted. Economies of scale works in case of fresh fish. The characteristics of fresh fish is as follows : As a large scale demander, General Merchandise Stores are the main purchasers of sea bream and the size of the fish is around 1.3kg. It mainly goes through negotiation. Aquacultured sea bream has been established as a representative food in General Merchandise Stores. GMS require stable and mass supply, consistent size, and low price. And Distribution of fresh fish is undertook by the large scale distributers, which can satisfy requirements of GMS. The market share in Tokyo Central Wholesale Market shows Mie Pref. is dominating in live fish. And Ehime Pref. is dominating in fresh fish. Ehime Pref. showed remarkable growth in 1990s. At present, the dealings of live fish is decreasing. However, the dealings of fresh fish is increasing in Tokyo Central Wholesale Market. The price of live fish is decreasing more than one of fresh fish. Even though Ehime Pref. has an ideal natural environment for sea bream aquaculture, its entry into sea bream aquaculture was late, because it was located at a further distance to consumers than the competing producing areas. However, Ehime Pref. became the number one producing areas through the sales of fresh fish in the 1990s. The production volume is almost 3 times the production volume of Mie Pref. which is the number two production area. More conversion from yellow tail aquaculture to sea bream aquaculture is taking place in Ehime Pref., because Kagosima Pref. has a better natural environment for yellow tail aquaculture. Transportation is worse than Mie Pref., but this region as a far-flung producing area makes up by increasing the business scale. Ehime Pref. increases the market share for fresh fish by creating demand from GMS. Ehime Pref. has developed market strategies such as a quick return at a small profit, a stable and mass supply and standardization in size. Ehime Pref. increases the market power by the capital of a large scale commission agent. Secondly Mie Pref. is close to markets and composed of small scale farmers. Mie Pref. switched to sea bream aquaculture early, because of the price decrease in aquacultured yellou tail and natural environmental problems. Mie Pref. had not changed until 1993 when the price of the sea bream plummeted. Because it had better natural environment and transportation. Mie Pref. has a suitable water temperature range required for sea bream aquaculture. However, the price of live sea bream continued to decline due to excessive production and economic recession. As a consequence, small scale farmers are faced with a market price below the average production cost in 1993. In such kind of situation, the small-sized and inefficient manager in Mie Pref. was obliged to withdraw from sea bream aquaculture. Kumamoto Pref. is located further from market sites and has an unsuitable nature environmental condition required for sea bream aquaculture. Although Kumamoto Pref. is trying to convert to the puffer fish aquaculture which requires different rearing techniques, aquaculture technique for puffer fish is not established yet.