• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.662-684
• /
• 1995

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength between various resin-bonded retainers and enamel according to the adhesive resins and retention types and observe the bond filure modes with scanning electron microscope(SEM). For this purpose, the followin eight sub-groups were tested in shear bond strength : 1) electrochemically etched group(Verabond) using Panavia EX and Superbond C&B 2) tin-plated group(PG-S) using Panavia EX and Superbond C&B 3) salt-treated group(Verabond) using Panavia EX and Superbond C&B 4) meshtreated group(Verabond) using Panavia EX and Superbond C&B. Thermocycling test was conducted on the condition of 15 second dwell time each in $5^{\circ}C$ and $55^{\circ}C$bath. Shear bond strength was measured by Instron Universal Testing Machine(medel 1125). The obtained results were as follows : 1. After thermocycling, the shear bond strengths of tin-plated group and electrochemically etched group were significantly greater than those of salt-treated group and mesh-treated group. And the shear bond strength of Panavia EX was greater than that of Superbond C&B with salt-treated group and tin-plated group(p<0.05). 2. Before thermocycling, electrochemically etched group using Superbond C&B produced the greatest shear bond strength(p<0.01). 3. The shear bond strength of electrochemically etched group using Superbond C&B was significantly decreased after thermocycling(p<0.01). 4. In observation of bond failure modes before thermocycling, Panavia EX highly exhibited enamel fracture. Tin-plated group using Superbond C&B adhesive failure between metal and resin and electrochemically etched group using Superbond C&B exhibited adhesive failure between enamel and rdsin. 5. In observation of failure modes after thermocycling, Panavia EX exhibited cohesive failure and Superbond C&B exhibited adhesive failure between resin and metal.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.449-474
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro shear bond strengths to enamel and the failure sites of three ceramic brackets and one metal bracket in combination with light cured orthodontic adhesive. The brackets were divided into four groups. Each ceramic bracket group had different bonding mechanisms with adhesive. Group A; metal bracket with foil-mesh base (control group) Group B; ceramic bracket with micromechanical retention Group C; ceramic bracket with chemical bonding Group D; ceramic bracket with mechanical retention and chemical bonding. Forty extracted human lower first premolars were prepared for bonding and 10 brackets for each group were bonded to prepared enamel surfaces with $Transbond^{\circledR}$ light cured ortho dontic adhesive. Twenty four hours after bonding, the Instron universal testing machine was used to test the shear bond strength of brackets to enamel. After debonding, brackets and enamel surfaces were examined under stereoscopic microscope to determine the failure sites, Statistical analysis of the data was carried out with ANOVA test and $Scheff\acute{e}$ test using SPSS PC+. The results were as follows. 1 . There were statistically significant differences in mean shear bond strengths of three ceramic bracket groups (p < 0.05). Shear bond strengths of group C and D were significantly higher than that of group B and shear bond strength of group C was significantly higher than that of group D. 2. Group C and D both had significantly higher shear bond strengths than metal bracket (group A), but there were no significant differences in shear bond strengths between group A and B (p < 0.05). 3. The failure sites of four bracket groups were also different. Group C and D failed primarily at enamel-adhesive interface, but group A and B failed primarily at bracket base-adhesive interface. 4. Among all ceramic bracket groups, group B was very similar to metal bracket in the aspect of shear bond strength and failure site.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.41-46
• /
• 2009

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. The poor chemical bonding of a denture base resin to cast titanium framework often introduces adhesive failure and increases microleakage. PURPOSE. This study evaluated the shear bond strengths of a heat cure denture base resin to commercially pure titanium, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and a cobalt-chromium alloy using two adhesive primers. MATERIAL AND MATHODS. Disks of commercially pure titanium, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and a cobalt-chromium alloy were cast. Specimens without the primer were also prepared and used as the controls. The shear bond strengths were measured on a screw-driven universal testing machine. RESULTS. The primers significantly(P < .05) improved the shear bond strengths of the heat cure resin to all metals. However, the specimens primed with the Alloy $primer^{(R)}$(MDP monomer) showed higher bond strength than those primed with the MR $bond^{(R)}$(MAC-10 monomer) on titanium. Only adhesive failure was observed at the metal-resin interface in the non-primed specimens, while the primed specimens showed mixed failure of adhesive and cohesive failure. CONCLUSIONS. The use of appropriate adhesive metal primers makes it possible not only to eliminate the need for surface preparation of the metal framework before applying the heat cure resins, but also reduce the need for retentive devices on the metal substructure. In particular, the Alloy $primer^{(R)}$, which contains the phosphoric acid monomer, MDP, might be clinically more acceptable for bonding a heat cure resin to titanium than a MR $bond^{(R)}$, which contains the carboxylic acid monomer, MAC-10.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.378-395
• /
• 1994

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various metal surface treatments and adhesive systems on the flexural bond strength of composite resin to Au-Ag-Cu-Pd alloy. The specimens were divided into nine groups by the combinations of surface treatment methods and adhesive systems. The types of surface treatment in this study were alumina blasting only, alumina blasting-Sn plating, alumina blasting-heating and three kinds of adhesive system used in this study were Silicoater system(Heraeus Kulzer GmbH,Germany), Superbond C & B(Sun Medical Co.,Ltd.,Japan) and Cesead opaque primer(Kurary Co.,Ltd.,Japan). After surface treatments and adhesive systems were applied, each specimen was built up with Dentacolor composite resin (Heraeus Kulzer GmbH,Germany). Four-point flexural bond strength was measured by Instron universal testing machine (Model 4301,U.S.A.) and modes of failure were observed by SEM(JEOL,SSM-840A,Japan). The obtained results were as follows: 1. The group that was bonded with Superbond C & B after alumina blasting-heating shelved the highest bond strength with significant difference among the groups, except the group with Cesead opaque primer after alumina blasting-Sn plating(P<0.05). 2. In the groups bonded with Cesead opaque primer, there was significant difference only in the bond strength between the alumina blasting-Sn plating group and alumina blasting group, where the former showed a higher bond strength(P<0.05). 3. In the groups bonded with Silicoater system, there were no significant differences in bond strength regardless of the surface treatment method(P<0.05). 4. In SEM evaluation, the groups of high bond strength, especially bonded with Superbond C & B after alumina blasting-heating and Cesead opaque primer after alumina blasting-Sn plating, revealed mainly cohesive-adhesive failure, whereas the others showed the tendency of adhesive failure.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.289-296
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths and failure sites of metal brackets bonded with chemically cured adhesive and light-cured adhesive. 10 brackets were bonded on prepared enamel surfaces with $Transbond^{circledR}$ (Unitek/3M; U.S.A.) light-cured orthodontic adhesive and another 10 brackets were bonded with $Ortho-one^{\circledR}$ (Bisco:U.S.A.) chemically cured orthodontic adhesive. 24 hours after bonding, the Instron universal testing machine was used to measure the shear bond strengths. The failure sites were examined under streoscopic microscope. The results were as follows: 1 . The mean shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded with light-cured adhesive was lower than that of metal brackets bonded with chemically cured adhesive, but the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). 2. Regardless of the type of adhesives, the brackets were failed primarily at the bracket base-adhesive interface. 3. Bonding of metal brackets with light-cured adhesive is considered to be clinically acceptable.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.955-974
• /
• 1998

적절한 전단접착강도를 가지면서 법랑질손상과 브라켓파절을 적게 일으키는 브라켓-접착제의 그룹을 찾아내기 위하여 전단접착강도, 법랑질손상, 브라켓탈락양상, 브라켓 주위의 밀봉과 법랑질-접착제-브라켓 사이의 긴밀도를 연구하였다. 교정치료 목적으로 발치한 240개의 치아를 각각 10개씩 24개의 군으로 나누어서 브라켓을 접착한 후 48시간 후에 전단접착강도를 측정하고 브라켓 탈락 양상을 조사하였다. 또한 브라켓 주위의 밀봉과 법랑질-접착제-브라켓 사이의 긴밀도를 평가하기 위하여 브라켓이 접착된 치아를 반으로 자른 후 주사전자현미경상에서 관찰하였다. 6종류의 브라켓과 4종류의 접착제가 사용되었으며 브라켓은 Image, Plastic, Crystaline, Fascination, Transcend, metal bracket을 사용하였으며 접착제로는 No-mix, Light-Bond, OrthoLC, Superbond C&B가 사용되었다. 이와같은 연구로부터 다음과 같은 결론을 내렸다. 1. 전단접착강도는 Fascination-Light Bond 군에서 36.58 Kg(410.07 Kg/$cm^2$)으로 가장 높았으며 Image-OrthoLC 군에 서 8.93 B◎ (75.51 Kg/$cm^2$)으로 가장 낮았다. OrthoLC를 접착제로 사용하였을 때 전단접착강도는 다른 접착제를 사용하였을 때 보다 비교적 낮았다. 2. 접착제의 종류에 관계없이 Fascination bracket의 전단접착강도는 비교적 높았으며 Image, Plastic bracket의 전단접착강도는 비교적 낮았다. Crystaline, Transcend bracket의 전단접착강도는 metal bracket의 전단접착강도와 비슷하거나 낮았다. 3. 전단접착강도와 법랑질 파절, 브라켓 파절은 상관관계가 있었으며, 접착강도가 증가할수록 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절은 증가하였다. 4. OrthoLC를 접착제로 사용하였을 때 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절은 일어나지 않았으나 Superbond C&B를 접착제로 사용하였을 때는 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절의 빈도가 높았다. 5. No-mix, Light-Bond를 접착제로 사용하였을 때 브라켓 주위의 밀봉과 법랑질-접착제-브라켓의 긴밀도는 양호하였다. 접착제의 종류에 관계없이 Ceramic bracket에서 접착제-브라켓의 긴밀도는 양호하였다. 6. 적절한 전단접착강도를 가지면서 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절을 일으키지 않는 군은 Crystaline-No mix, Crystaline Light Bond, Crystaline-OrthoLC, metal-No mix, metal-Light Bond, metal-OrthoLC군이였다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.281-287
• /
• 2004

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of adhesive property on microtensile bond strength and to determine the failure mode. Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were prepared using low-speed diamond saw. The dentin was etched with 37％ phosphoric acid. The following adhesives were applied to the etched dentin to manufacturer's directions： Scotchbond Multi-Purpose in group SM, Prime＆Bond NT in group NT, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose followed by Tetric-flow in group TR. After adhesive application, a cylinder of resin-based composite was built up on the occlusal surface. Each tooth was sectioned vertically to obtain the $1{\;}{\times}{\;}1\textrm{mm}^2$ "sticks". Microtensile bond strength were determined. Each specimen was observed under stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to examine the failure mode. Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA. The results of this study were as follows：1. The microtensile bond strength value were：group SM ($18.98{\pm}3.01MPa$). group NT ($16.01{\pm}4.82MPa$) and group TR ($17.56{\pm}3.22MPa$). No significant statistical differences were observed among the groups (P>0.05). 2. Most of specimens showed mixed failure. In group TR, there was a higher number of specimens showing areas of cohesive failure in resin.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.333-342
• /
• 2004

기존의 가시광선 중합기와 비교해서 plasma are light와 LED) 방식의 중합기를 이용해 브라켓을 치아표면에 접착한 후 탈락시키는 실험을 시행해 각각의 중합방식별로 전단결합강도와 접착파절양상을 비교함으로써 임상에서의 유용성을 평가하고자 하였다. 교정치료를 위해 발거한 상, 하악 소구치 60개를 윈통형의 레진블록에 매몰하여 시편을 제작하였다. 광중합형 접착레진인 Transbond XT를 이용하여 광중합 방식별로 조건(가시광선 중합기는 40초, LED방식의 중합기는 20춘, 그리고 plasma arc light 방식의 중합기는 3초)에 따라 브라켓을 접착한 후 만능물성실험기로 전단결합강도를 측정하고 브라켓 기저면을 광학현미경으로 관찰해 접착파절양상을 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 가시광선 중합방식과 LED 중합방식으로 중합시킨 군간에 전단결합강도의 유의성 있는 차이는 없지만 plasma arc Light방식으로 중합시킨 군은 앞의 두 군에 비해 유의성이 있게 작은 간을 나타내었다(p>0.05). 2. 가시광선 중합방식으로 중합한 군과 LED방식을 이용한 군에서는 파절양상이 거의 유사하게 나타났다. 두 군 모두 잔류접착제가 치아면에만 있는 경우가 제일 적은 비율을 도였으며 브라켓 기저면에 50% 이상의 집착제가 남아 있는 양상이 더 큰 비율을 보였다. 3. Plasma arc light 로 중합시킨 경우에는 접착제가 브라켓 기저면에 50% 이하로 남아있는 양상이 큰 비율로 나타났으며 잔류 접착제 전체가 치아면에 남아 있는 경우는 15%였다. 이상의 실험결과 plasma arc light를 이용한 중합 방식이 가시광선이나 LED 방식을 이용한 중합 방식에 비해 유의성 있게(p>0.05) 낮은 전단결합강도를 보였으나 세 방식 모두 인상적으로 사용하기에 충분한 전단결합강도를 보여 유용하게 사용할 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.262-272
• /
• 2022

PURPOSE. This study aimed to analyze the shear bond strength between the 3D-printed denture base and the chairside relining material, according to the surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Cylindrical specimens were prepared using DENTCA Denture Base II. The experimental groups were divided into 6 (n = 10): no surface treatment (C), Tokuyama Rebase II Normal adhesive (A), sandblasting (P), sandblasting and adhesive (PA), sandblasting and silane (PS), and the Rocatec system (PPS). After bonding the chairside relining material to the center of the specimens in a cylindrical shape, they were stored in distilled water for 24 hours. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure mode was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope. Shear bond strength values were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's honest significant difference test was used for post-hoc analysis (P < .05). RESULTS. Group PPS exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength than all other groups. Groups P and PA displayed significantly higher bond strengths than the control group. There were no significant differences between groups PS and A compared to the control group. Regarding the failure mode, adhesive failure occurred primarily in groups C and A, and mixed failure mainly in groups P, PA, PS, and PPS. CONCLUSION. The shear bond strength between the 3D-printed denture base and the chairside relining material exhibited significant differences according to the surface treatment methods. It is believed that excellent adhesive strength will be obtained when the Rocatec system is applied to 3D-printed dentures in clinical practice.

• 접착 및 계면
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.6-13
• /
• 2020

The objective of the current study is to characterize the long-term stability and efficacy of a structural adhesive assembly under static load. An apparatus was designed to be used in the Instron tensile test machine that would allow for real time modeling of the failure characteristics of an assembly utilizing a moisture- cure adhesive which was bonded to concrete. A regression model was developed that followed a linear - natural log function which was used to predict the expected life of the assembly. Evaluations at different curing times confirmed the structure was more robust with longer cure durations prior to loading. Finally, the results show that under the conditions the assembly was tested, there was only a small amount of inelastic creep and the regression models demonstrated the potential for a stable structure lasting several decades.