Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.281

THE EFFECT OF ADHESIVE PROPERTY ON MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH TO HUMAN DENTIN  

Kim, Hyoun-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Hyun-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.29, no.3, 2004 , pp. 281-287 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of adhesive property on microtensile bond strength and to determine the failure mode. Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were prepared using low-speed diamond saw. The dentin was etched with 37％ phosphoric acid. The following adhesives were applied to the etched dentin to manufacturer's directions： Scotchbond Multi-Purpose in group SM, Prime＆Bond NT in group NT, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose followed by Tetric-flow in group TR. After adhesive application, a cylinder of resin-based composite was built up on the occlusal surface. Each tooth was sectioned vertically to obtain the $1{\;}{\times}{\;}1\textrm{mm}^2$ "sticks". Microtensile bond strength were determined. Each specimen was observed under stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to examine the failure mode. Data were analyzed using one way ANOVA. The results of this study were as follows：1. The microtensile bond strength value were：group SM ($18.98{\pm}3.01MPa$). group NT ($16.01{\pm}4.82MPa$) and group TR ($17.56{\pm}3.22MPa$). No significant statistical differences were observed among the groups (P>0.05). 2. Most of specimens showed mixed failure. In group TR, there was a higher number of specimens showing areas of cohesive failure in resin.
Keywords
Microtensile bond strength; Adhesive; Dentin; Stereomicroscope; Scaning eletron microscope; Failure mode;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63(12):1396 1399, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as 'filled adhesives' : literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30(4):249 57, 1999
3 Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72(10):1434 1442, 1993   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Tani C, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S. Effect of filler content on bonding efficacy of 4 META MMA/TBB bonding agent. Dent Mater J 13(2):131 37, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Rada RE. The versatility of flowable composites. Dent Today, 1998 Apr;17(4):78 83   PUBMED
6 Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins LR, Dias CT, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3(4):315 324, 2001
7 Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 27(4): 265 274, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Figueiredo Reis A, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM, Chan DC. The effects of filling techniques and a low viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent 31(1):59 66, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66(11):1636 1639, 1987   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 26(2):95 110, 1995
11 Frankenberger R, Lopes M, Perdigao J, Ambrose WW, Rosa BT. The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives. Dent Mater 18(3):227 238, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kanca J 3rd. One step bond strength to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 10(1):5 8, 1997   PUBMED
13 Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9(4):167 173, 1996   PUBMED
14 Kemp Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69(6):1240 1243, 1990   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
15 Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 6(6):295 298, 1993   PUBMED
16 Fortin D, Swift EJ Jr, Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 10(4):253 258, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 14(3):212 221, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15(2):128 137, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. The influence of water storage and C factor on the dentin resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater 17(3):268 276, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21(1);17 24, 1996
21 Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129 (5):567 577, 1998   DOI
22 Nakabayashi N. Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int. 1991 Feb;22(2):73 4
23 Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on post operative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 17(2):103 111, 1986
24 Perdigao J, Swift EJ Jr, Gomes G, Lopes GC. Bond strengths of new simplified dentin enamel adhesives. Am J Dent 12(6):286 290, 1999   PUBMED
25 Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Tensile bond strength of filled and unfilled adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 13(2):73 76, 2000   PUBMED
26 Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 9(3):100 104, 1996   PUBMED
27 Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of a micro tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10(4):236 240, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Kanca J Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5(4):213 215, 1992   PUBMED
29 Montes MA, de Goes MF, da Cunha MR, Soares AB. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 29(6):435 441, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Miyazaki M, Ando S, Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater 11(4):234 238, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systems. Oper Dent 26(1):44 47, 2001
32 Nunes MF, Swift EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of adhesive composition on microtensile bond strength to human dentin. Am J Dent 14(6):340 343, 2001   PUBMED
33 Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Jacoby T, Wataha JC, Pashley D. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of class II cavities, in vitro. Dent Mater 17(4):316 321, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 25(6):441 458, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Kemp Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 67(5):841 845, 1988   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn