• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.289-299
• /
• 2017

Because of its unique ordnance or operational requirements, military aircraft has potential risks different from civil aircraft. This explains why there is no global document for military airworthiness and each nation has its own sovereign authority. But harmonized airworthiness activities among authorities are required to reduce cost and time for recent multinational programs. In this study, we show the airworthiness policy of the European Military Airworthiness Authorities and U.S. DOD Authorities which facilitate recognition of certificates and approvals issued by any other authorities. And we propose future works for Korea military airworthiness society to develop organizational recognition system.

• International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.54-62
• /
• 2014

The Air and Space Interoperability Council (ASIC) has adopted the European Defence Agency (EDA) process for inter-regulatory military airworthiness authority recognition. However, there are gaps in the application of this process to nations outside of the European Union. This paper proposes a model that can effectively map diverse technical airworthiness regulatory frameworks. This model, referred to as the Product-Behaviour-Process (PBP) Bow-Tie model, provides the systematic structure needed to represent and compare regulatory frameworks. The PBP Bow-Tie model identifies key points of difference that need to be addressed, during inter-agency recognition between the two regulatory authorities. With the intention to adopt global use of the EDA process, the proposed PBP Bow-Tie model can be used as a basis for the successful recognition of regulatory frameworks outside of the European Union. Iris plots produced from the implementation of this model are presented, and proposed as a suitable means of illustrating the outcome of an assessment, and of supporting the comparisons of results. A comparative analysis of the Australian Defence Force and New Zealand Defence Force airworthiness regulatory frameworks is used as a case study. The case study clearly illustrates the effectiveness of the model in discerning regulatory framework differences; moreover, it has offered an opportunity to explore the limitations of the Iris plot.

• 항공우주시스템공학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.105-114
• /
• 2016

국가간의 지역충돌, 영토, 보호, 대테러 그리고 국제 무역 흐름에 직면한 현 세계는 항공기 수출, 부대파견 및 해외 주둔에 연관되어 감항인증 업무가 증가될 수 있다. 주권 국가의 위치와 책임을 최소화하기 위해서 외국 군 당국사이의 감항인증 절차를 확립하는 것은 중요하다. 이 연구는 항공기 개발 및 운영을 위한 비행 안전을 확보하기 위한 인정 파트너 사이의 군 감항 인정을 연구하였다. 이 논문은 감항 당국의 역할, 감독능력, 생산절차 및 인증의 소개로 미국 및 유럽 군 당국의 인정의제를 분석하였다. 군 당국인정인제를 기본으로, 다른 외국 군당국과 한국군감항당국에 의해 요구되는 규정활동을 감소할 수 있다.