Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.20910/JASE.2016.10.4.105

Study on Foreign Military Authority Recognition Questionsets (MARQs)  

Roh, Jin Chul (School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Korea Aerospace University)
Goo, Bon Wook (Defense Acquisition Program Administration)
Ko, Joon Soo (Defense Acquisition Program Administration)
Publication Information
Journal of Aerospace System Engineering / v.10, no.4, 2016 , pp. 105-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
The world is currently confronted with regional conflicts among nations that seek to protect their territory. The associated counter-terrorism activities and international business flows can be increased through airworthiness-recognition tasks that are related to aircraft exports, dispatch troops, and overseas bases. It is important to establish airworthiness-recognition processes between foreign military authorities to minimize the potential for sovereign national positions and responsibilities. For this study, the military airworthiness recognition between recognition partners was surveyed to secure flight safety for the development and operation of aircrafts. The analysis of the U.S. and European Military Authority Recognition Questionsets (MARQs) in this paper introduces the rules, inspection capabilities, production process, and certification of the airworthiness authority. The regulatory activities, which are required by the Korea Military Airworthiness Authority (MAA) with respect to foreign MAAs, can be reduced by the implementation of the MARQ.
Keywords
Airworthiness; Recognition; Inspection; Production; Certification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 The Korean National Assembly, Act On The Flight Safety Certification Of Military Aircrafts, 2009. 4. 1.
2 Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Regulation On The Flight Safety Certification Of Military Aircrafts, 2009.12.11
3 EDC, European Military Airworthiness Document 'Recognition', 2014.8.21.
4 US Army, Regulation 700-142(Type Classification, Materiel Release, Fielding, and Transfer), 2013. 1.17.
5 US Army, Regulation 70-62(Airworthiness Qualification of US Army Aircraft Systems), 2000. 7. 7.
6 US Navy, OPNAVINST 3710.7 (Standardization General Flight And Operating Instructions), 2004. 4. 1
7 US Navy, NAVAIRINST 13034.1(Flight Clearance Policy For Air Vehicles And Aircraft Systems), 2004. 9.28.
8 Department of Defense, Directive 5030.61, 2013. 5.24.
9 US Air Force, Policy Directive 62-6, 2010. 6.11.
10 Joon soo Ko, Kyungmok Kim, "Certification Criteria and Safety Assessment for High Altitude Long Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicle", Journal of Aerospace System Engineering, Vol 10, No 2, 2016
11 US Army, Regulation 95-1(Flight Regulations), 2008.11.12
12 US Army, CNAFINST 4790.2(The Naval Aviation Maintenance Program (NAMP)), 2013. 6.15.
13 US Army, Regulation 750-1(Army Materiel Maintenance Policy), 2013. 9.12.
14 Department of Defense Joint Service Specification Guide 2001 Air Vehicle, 2000. 4. 15.
15 US Air Force, Instruction 62-601, 2010. 6.11.
16 Heekweon Yoon, Sangchul Lee, "A Study on the Airworthiness Certification of korean Indigenously Developed Military Aircrafts", Journal of Aerospace System Engineering, Vol 1, No 2, 2007
17 Department of Defense , Directive 5030.61, 2013. 5.24.