• 임상간호연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.85-98
• /
• 2010

Purpose: This study was aimed to investigate the awareness and attitudes towards withdrawal of the life-sustaining treatment among nurses, physicians, and the families of intensive care unit (ICU) patients in general hospitals. Methods: The data were collected using a questionnaire from 80 ICU nurses, 80 physicians, and 80 families of ICU patients in general hospitals. Data were collected from February 22nd to May 31st, 2010. Rusults: ICU nurses, physicians, and families of ICU patients felt that objective and ethical guidelines were needed in making a decision to withdraw the life-sustaining treatment. The main reason for withdrawal of the life-sustaining treatment was found that the patients could not recovered despite many efforts. The role of nurses in decision making process on withdrawal of the life-sustaining treatment was considered very positive from the view of physicians and family members. The most important role of nurses for those patients in ICU was found to try their best to care for the patients. Conclusion: ICU nurses should play a major coordinating role in communication among patients, their families, and medical teams. Also, an appropriate roles of nurses in the process of the withdrawal of the life-sustaining treatment should be established.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.119-126
• /
• 2021

근대5종 경기는 기구 없이 하는 운동과 기구를 사용하는 운동 그리고 동물과 함께하는 운동은 물론 사람과 사람이 경쟁하는 운동뿐만 아니라 정적운동과 동적운동을 포함하는 운동 종목이다. 근대5종 경기 선수들의 윤리적인 문제는 열악한 환경과 경제적 이유와도 관계가 있으며 운동선수의 윤리인식과 태도, 그리고 정신은 스포츠 선수의 심적 환경에 많은 영향을 주고 있다. 본 연구에서는 현대 스포츠에서 중요한 문제로 다르고 있는 윤리적인 문제들의 개선 방향을 검토하고자 질적 연구방법을 적용하여 근대5종 경기의 스포츠 정신과 윤리성을 탐색하고자 하였다. 스포츠에서 보상주의는 경기력 향상이나 기록 갱신의 원인이 되기도 하지만 때로는 왜곡된 선수상의 형성 원인이 되기도 한다. 에어도핑은 선수의 건강이나 공정성의 논란과 함께 스포츠선수의 정신적 육체적 손상과 폐해를 야기할 수 있는 윤리적 문제를 안고 있다. 금지약물을 복용하는 선수나 이를 방치하거나 종용하는 지도자나 감독자의 책임과 윤리문제는 매우 중요한 사안으로 다루어지고 취급되어야한다. 스포츠 현장에서 선수나 감독 지도자의 경기실적에 종속된 보수체계가 선수나 지도자의 생계와 연관이 있기 때문에 공정하고 정의로운 경기진행을 위해 성과에만 매달리는 선수육성에서 탈피하여 이념과 논리에서 합리적으로 인식되는 윤리성회복을 강조함으로써 비윤리성문제가 극복되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권9호
• /
• pp.592-601
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 간호사의 윤리적 갈등과 관련된 국내 연구 동향과 간호윤리교육 현황을 분석하여 향후 간호윤리 교육의 방향성을 제시하고자 시도되었다. 국내 4개 데이터베이스에서 '간호사', '윤리', '도덕', '생명윤리', '갈등', '민감성', '고뇌', '딜레마', '이슈', '가치관'의 단어 조합으로 검색한 결과 2000년부터 2021년 12월까지 591편의 논문이 확인되었고, 이 중 111편의 논문을 최종 분석하였다. 간호윤리교육 현황은 간호교육 인증평가원에 등록된 4년제 학사학위프로그램 운영 203개교 중 184개교를 대상으로 분석하였다. 연구 결과 간호사 대상 윤리적 갈등과 관련된 연구는 꾸준히 증가하고 있고, 종합병원 간호사를 대상으로 한 양적연구가 가장 많았다. 주요 주제어는 도덕적 민감성, 도덕적 고뇌, 윤리적 딜레마, 생명의료 윤리의식 등으로 확인되었다. 간호윤리교육은 68% 대학에서 전공과목으로 운영하고 있었고, 과반수의 대학에서 1학점 또는 2학점으로, 주로 1, 2학년에 개설하였다. 본 연구 결과 사회적 변화에 따라 간호사가 경험하는 윤리적 갈등은 증가하고 있어, 대학의 간호윤리교육 비중은 더 확대되어야 하고, 교육 효과의 지속성을 위해 학년별 단계별 교육모형 구축이 필요함을 확인하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.451-460
• /
• 1996

The ethical issue is one of the most important themes in both science and environmental education. Especially related to the right of other species, animal dissection has been brought about two contradictory attitudes. In spring 1996, a survey was conducted to assess the status of animal dissection in secondary schools and the awareness of 94 biology teachers and 422 secondary students toward animal dissection. And the meaning of animal dissection in biology class was discussed in terms of environmental education. The findings were as follows: First, most of students(96.6%) had participated once or twice to animal dissection experiments(eg. fish, frog, shellfish, cuttlefish and chicken). And about half of teachers (57.4$\sim$64.9%) and some students(41.9%) felt ethical conflict in animal dissection. Second, many teachers(81.0%) and students(87.1%) thought that animal dissection was effective method to achieve the goal of biology education, but they needed more consideration on the respect for life in animal dissection experiment. Third, many teachers(88.3%) had students, who objected to animal dissection, participate obligatorily or passively. Fourth, teachers and students thought that audio-visual media such as video(teachers 63.5%, students 39.7%), computer simulations(teachers 31.7%, students 28.1%) and models(teachers 22.2%, students 24.1%) could be effective as alternatives. These findings suggest that animal dissection experiment, although it is needed to achieve the goal of biology education, requires careful consideration on the rights of animal and the respect for life, and alternatives for students who object to animal dissection in biology class.

• 마케팅과학연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.49-58
• /
• 2010

企业社会责任已经成为学者们进行研究的一个重要课题. 多数认为企业社会责任对企业去定义他们在社会中的责任是必要的, 并且为他们的商业活动提供社会和道德标准. 其结果是, 相当数量的零售商已经采用企业社会责任为一个战略工具来宣传他们的商业活动. 为此, 本研究企图探索美国消费者在他们对零售商主观的感知和评估的基础上在道德购买和消费中的态度和行为. 本文的目的包括: 1)测定参与者对零售商企业社会责任的认知度. 2)评定参与者如何评估零售商企业社会责任. 3)测定参与者对零售商企业社会责任的评估过程是否影响他们对零售商的态度. 4)评定参与者对零售商企业社会责任的态度是否影响他们的购买行为. 本文并没有关注实际的零售商企业社会责任表现. 因为消费者的决定过程是基于个体的评定而不是实际的事实. 本研究调查了美国大学生对零售商企业社会责任的认知和评估. 本研究的参与者是56名来自美国东南大学的大学生. 他们的年龄在18岁到26岁之间. 使用开放性译码和选择性译码进行内容分析. 我们收集和分析了超过100张单倍行距的答复. 使用两步骤的译码(即开放性译码和选择性译码. 译码结果和分析笔记用来理解参与者对企业社会责任的认知和从书写的回复中提炼出来包括直接引用的答案所支持的伦理购买行为. 为保护参与者隐私, 这里使用的都是化名. 参与者被要求写下有关零售商, 他们对企业社会责任问题的认识和评估一个零售商的企业社会责任表现. 大部分应答者(n=28)表明他们对企业社会责任有一定的认识但是不觉得需要按这个要求去做. 少数应答者(n=8)表明他们对企业社会责任有一定的认识但是基本不关心. 结果表明当大学生评估零售商的几页社会责任表现时, 他们使用企业社会责任的三个纬度: 员工支持, 社区支持和环境支持. 我们发现如何对待和支持员工是一个评估零售商的企业社会责任的重要准则. 应答者表明作为一个员工和零售商有好的经历会使他们对此零售商有积极的感知和态度. 和员工支持相关的有四个主题: 根据员工表现的奖励和惩罚, 工作环境, 员工教育和训练课程, 以及员工和员工家人折扣. 良好的赏罚机制被认为是一个重要的属性. 和工作环境相关的因素包括: 零售商如何良好的遵守与工作时间相关的规则, 午餐时间和休息同样被认为是重要的属性之一. 有关社区支持, 有三个方面: 对当地社区销售比率的贡献, 对慈善组织的财政贡献和对社区大型活动的支持. 在环境方面, 有两个主题: 循环利用和销售有机或绿色产品. 在回复中有提到, 零售商正在尝试去做对环境友好所能做的. 一位应答者提到这个公司正在创造有环保设计的店铺. 并且能在这家公司的网站上轻松的找到为帮助环境所做的事情的信息. 应答者还注意到这些店铺可提供有机和亲环境产品. 应答者在此类中还提到关于这个公司如何使用环保的杯子和他们如何帮助新奥尔良的居民重建家园. 应答者注意到零售商为购买产品的消费者提供可再使用的袋子. 一位应答者说一家零售商通过提供有机棉来使他们的产品帮助环境. 在分析应答者之后, 我们发现参与者对零售商的企业社会责任的评估影响他们对零售商的态度. 然而, 在态度和购买行为之间有显著的差异. 尽管参与者对零售商的企业社会责任有积极的态度, 但资金和时间的缺乏也影响他们的购买行为. 总体来看, 一半的应答者(n=28)提到在购物时企业社会责任表现影响他们的购买决定. 本研究的结果为零售商针对消费者提高他们的形象而考虑企业社会责任提供了支持. 本研究暗示出消费者根据员工, 社区和环境三方面的支持来评估零售商. 评估, 态度和购买行为似乎是密切相关的. 也就是说, 评估是基于消费者对零售商企业社会责任的认识. 这些认识可以影响他们对零售商的态度从而进一步影响他们的购买行为. 参与者同时表明企业社会责任会使他们对零售商印象良好但是并不会影响他们的购买行为. 在参与者中, 价格和便利似乎超越了企业社会责任的重要性. 本文还讨论了此研究的启示, 对未来研究的建议和研究的局限.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.50-54
• /
• 2014

It is becoming increasingly important for medical doctors to have a thorough understanding of human genetics and the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic testing, counseling, and treatment. As genetic engineering and technology evolves, medical doctors will find themselves called in to counsel patients about a rapidly increasing number of diseases for which genetic testing and treatments are available. Medical doctors will need to master a new set of principles and clinical skills. A lack of knowledge about these issues and problems may lead to serious, lifelong or even fatal negative effects on patients. Medical genetics has moved from the study of rare conditions to the illumination of disorders that impact the entire spectrum of medical practice. This study demonstrates several areas in which medical genetics is clearly an important tool in medical practice and the necessity of establishing new curriculum for clinical genetic education in Korea. Medical students nearing graduation may lack genetic knowledge that is essential for daily practice because genetics has little or no place in clinical teaching. Medical schools should make extensive curriculum changes to increase students' awareness of clinical genetics and its ethical implications. The medical school curriculum will need creative new approaches to keeping up with the rapid pace of evolution of clinical genetics.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.7-10
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The experience by a researcher highlighted steps is guided by a specific ethical codes of conduct. The purpose of the current study is to discuss the fabrication and falsification of data as the key ethical misconduct committed by many researchers focus on their causes and impact in the research field. Research design, data and methodology: To obtain suitable textual resource, the current study used content analysis to closely take a look at the fabrication and falsification based on prior research in the realm of publication ethics. As a result, the current authors could collect and understand adequate textual data from appropriate prior resources. Results: The Research misconduct is a common practice in different countries across the world. Based on the findings from this study, data fabrication or falsification have a grievous impact on all the stakeholders of a study. The unethical behavior affects the parties concerned both psychologically and financially. Conclusions: It is, therefore, recommended that researchers should be held accountable. This can be done through different means, including raising awareness of vulnerability to data fabrication and falsification. The government and research institute should also advocate for effective policies guiding research studies across the world.

• 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-4
• /
• 2022

Although disaster research participants are in a more vulnerable state than general research participants, various ethical issues to be considered in the study may be overlooked due to the special situation of disaster. Therefore, research ethics should be considered to reduce damage to study participants and maximize benefits. In addition, from the perspective of researchers, ethical considerations should be applied in the disaster research process, so research ethics awareness should be established. In addition, at the health care institution and national level, it is necessary to prepare research ethics that reflect the Korean situation while meeting international standards in consideration of the characteristics of local communities. In Korea, after the Ferry Sewol accident in 2014, social interest in disaster mental health increased and the National Trauma Center was established in 2018, raising the need for disaster mental health ethics guidelines. Therefore, this review aims to discuss the significance of six items: specificity of the study, prior consent and autonomy, community participation, confidentiality and feedback provision, risk minimization, and research support. So far, the experience of disaster mental health research is not sufficient in South Korea. Therefore, the current guidelines are required to be continuously revised through practical experience in the future.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2013

지금까지 인터넷중독과 관련한 연구는 주로 (1)인터넷 과다 사용 (2)중독 (3)현실상황 장애의 매커니즘에 근거하여 이루어져 왔다. 이러한 접근은 인터넷중독에 대한 사회적 경각심을 부여할 뿐만 아니라 인터넷중독의 예방과 치료를 위한 심리적 정서적 접근 방법을 도입하는 근거로 활용되었다는 점에서는 매우 의미있는 작업이었다. 하지만 인터넷중독에 대한 근원적 탐구 즉, 인터넷을 어떤 목적으로 어떻게 이용할 것인지를 접근하는 인간의 가치체계와 근본적으로 관련이 있는 윤리적 접근은 부족하였다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 먼저 인터넷윤리와 관련하여 목적론적 윤리관, 의무론적 윤리관, 덕 윤리관, 책임 윤리관을 제시하였다. 또한, 네가지 윤리관을 적용하여 인터넷중독은 각각의 윤리관에 근거하여 정당성을 부여받을 수 없는 행위임을 주장하였다. 이러한 주장을 토대로 인터넷중독 예방 및 감소를 위한 개입 방안으로 인터넷윤리 교육의 필요성을 강조하고 지금까지 통속적 컴퓨터 윤리학 강좌에서 탈피하여 이론적 컴퓨터 윤리학으로서의 전환을 제안하였다.

• 영어영문학
• /
• 제55권6호
• /
• pp.1163-1191
• /
• 2009

As many critics do, this article starts from the premise that Charles Waddell Chesnutt wrote The Conjure Woman with a distinct socio-ethical view to ameliorating white readers' racism. For this purpose of social activism, first, the author uses a racially submissive genre and narrator- antebellum plantation-dialect fiction and an old ex-slave Julius-in order to win the attention of white racists, who constituted the majority of the reading public of postbellum America. Chesnutt then allows this seemingly submissive ex-slave consecutively to wage narrative battles against a Northern white capitalist, John. This fiction's structure is thus based on interracial narrative conflict. Granted, the result of these narrative battles is Julius's defeat. Even though he sometimes has narrative success through his manipulation of either his white female auditor's sentimentalism or the white capitalist's racial prejudice, it does not lead to any fundamental change in the white audience members' awareness: John still regards Julius's tacitly reformoriented tales merely as nonsensical ghost stories invented by the absurd imagination of a subservient, entertaining, and exploitable black coachman. Admitting his defeat, Julius relinquishes his original goal of deterring John's capitalist exploitation of both racial Others and the natural environment of the South and finally decides to serve the economic power of white capitalism. This self-defeating conclusion, however, should not be identified with Chesnutt's failure as an author. Rather, it should be understood as an interim result of the black author's earnest experiment with literary media best suited to his reform project. In fact, this narrative failure reveals Chesnutt's accurate diagnosis of the postbellum literary world: a black voice is still feebly heard and even easily buried by the whites' capitalist ambition and consequently intensifying racism. Conclusively, Julius's narrative failure should be positively evaluated as Chesnutt's one step further in his gradual and lifelong progress to a narrative goopher effectively to engage whites' imagination and sympathy for a vision of equal interracial coexistence.