• Analytical Science and Technology
• /
• v.11 no.6
• /
• pp.485-494
• /
• 1998

Ternary and quaternary alloys composed of Mo-Ru-Rh-Pd were prepared and their crystal structure and quantitative chemical compositions were analysed by XRD, WDX, EDX and ICP/AES. The results of X-ray diffraction studies showed that the alloys were crystallized in hexagonal close packing, well known as ${\varepsilon}$-phase with $P6_3/mmc$ of space group. The optimum accelerating voltage for Zr~Cd(40~48) analyzed by EPMA using PET crystal was found to be 15 kV and the linear regression coefficient(R) of atomic number and X-ray intensity was approximately 0.998 without Tc standard specimen. The WDX results of alloys of Mo and Pd by linear regression equations were detected to be 0.1% lower compared to WDX analysis results using standard specimen, while Ru, Rh were detected 3% higher. These alloys were completely dissolved in mixed acid of 12.5 mL HCl and 1 mL $HNO_3$, at $220^{\circ}C$ for 22 hours using autoclave with PTFE vessel. There was no reprecipitating phenomnon when diluted 100 times with 1N-HCl. The results of ICP/AES analysis deviated less than 4% comparing with those of normal WDX analysis.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.36-43
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness and the fluoride content of enamel and dentin around fluoride- or non fluoride-containing restorations. Forty extracted human teeth were used and prepared cervical cavities on proximal surface. Experimental teeth were divided into five groups . Group 1 : Prime & Bond NT and Z100, Group 2 Prime & Bond NT and F2000, Group 3 : Scotchbond Multi-purpose and Z100, Group 4 : Scothcbond Multi-purpose and F2000, Group 5 : Fuji II LC. The cavities were filled with dentin adhesives and restorative materials. After each tooth was bisected, one half was tested microharaness and the other half was analyzed the fluoride at the enamel and dentin by an EPMA-WDX device. The results were as follows; 1. There was no statistical difference among the microhardness of enamel surface in all group. 2. The microhardness at dentin of $100{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and $20{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Grocup 4 was lower than that of normal dentin (p>0.05). 3. There was no statistical difference among the fluoride content of enamel surface in all group. 4. The fluoride content at the dentin of $30{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and 5 were higher than those at $100{\;}\mu\textrm{m}{\;}and{\;}200{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and normal dentin (p<0.05). 5. At the dentin of $30{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point, Group 2 showed higher fluoride content than Group 1 and 3, and Group 5 showed higher fluoride content than other groups.