• Title/Summary/Keyword: Dynamic breakout strength

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Dynamic Shear Strength of Stirrup-reinforced Cast-in Anchors by Seismic Qualification Tests (스터럽 보강 선설치 앵커의 지진모의실험에 의한 동적 전단 저항강도 평가)

  • Kim, Tae Hyung;Park, Yong Myung;Kang, Choong Hyun;Lee, Jong Han
    • Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-76
    • /
    • 2018
  • An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the breakout strength of stirrup-reinforced cast-in anchors under dynamic shear loadings. The shear loadings were applied in the manner specified in the ACI 355.2 and ETAG 001 for the seismic qualification tests. Test specimens were fabricated with M36 anchor (edge distance, 180mm) reinforced with D10 stirrups (spacing, 100mm). The specimens reached almost the breakout strength and thereafter fracture of anchor occurred. Additional tests with M42 anchor (edge distance, 160mm) reinforced with D6 bars (spacing, 100mm) were also conducted. The experimental results showed that the dynamic shear strength was not less than the static resistance. Based on the test results, it was shown that ACI 318 and ETAG 001 specifications estimate the breakout strength of stirrup-reinforced anchors conservatively as more reinforcement is provided.

Dynamic shear strength of unreinforced and Hairpin-reinforced cast-in-place anchors using shaking table tests

  • Kim, Dong Hyun;Park, Yong Myung;Kang, Choong Hyun;Lee, Jong Han
    • Structural Engineering and Mechanics
    • /
    • v.58 no.1
    • /
    • pp.39-58
    • /
    • 2016
  • Since the publication of ACI 318-02, the concrete capacity design (CCD) method has been used to determine the resistance of unreinforced concrete anchors. The regulation of steel-reinforced anchors was proposed in ACI 318-08. Until ACI 318-08, the shear resistance of concrete breakout for an unreinforced anchor during an earthquake was reduced to 75% of the static shear strength, but this reduction has been eliminated since ACI 318-11. In addition, the resistance of a hairpin-reinforced anchor was calculated using only the strength of the steel, and a regulation on the dynamic strength was not given for reinforced anchors. In this study, shaking table tests were performed to evaluate the dynamic shear strength of unreinforced and hairpin-reinforced cast-in-place (CIP) anchors during earthquakes. The anchors used in this study were 30 mm in diameter, with edge distances of 150 mm and embedment depths of 240 mm. The diameter of the hairpin steel was 10 mm. Shaking table tests were carried out on two specimens using the artificial earthquake, based on the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC)'s Regulatory Guide 1.60, and the Northridge earthquake. The experimental results were compared to the current ACI 318 and ETAG 001 design codes.

Shear Resistance of Unreinforced Cast-In-Place Anchors in Uncracked and Cracked Concrete by Seismic Qualification Tests (지진모의실험에 의한 비균열 및 균열콘크리트에 매입된 비보강 선설치앵커의 전단 저항강도 평가)

  • Park, Yong Myung;Kim, Tae Hyung;Kim, Dong Hyun;Jo, Sung Hoon;Lee, Jong Han
    • Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction
    • /
    • v.27 no.3
    • /
    • pp.347-357
    • /
    • 2015
  • In this study, an experimental study was performed to evaluate the concrete breakout strength of unreinforced cast-in-place anchors by seismic qualification test under shear loading. The CIP anchors tested herein were 30mm in diameter with an edge distance of 150mm and an embedment depth of 240mm in uncracked and cracked concrete. The cracked specimen consisted of orthogonal and parallel crack to the loading direction, respectively. The dynamic loading sequence during the seismic qualification test was determined based on CSA N287.2, ACI 355.2 and ETAG 001 codes. After the dynamic loading, the static loading was applied until failure occurs. The shear resistance by seismic qualification tests showed almost the same strength as that obtained from the static tests in uncrcaked and cracked concrete, respectively. Meanwhile, the breakout depth did not reach $8d_0$, therefore the modified strength equation of ACI 318-11 could estimate properly the concrete breakout strength, which does not consider effective bearing length.