• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.53-79
• /
• 2010

The study was originated from recognition that project participants' satisfaction should be Improved to raise project performance and to make progress of a successful project since the above dissatisfaction was operated as a danger factor of the project. The study selected one large-scale sample project and attempted measuring characteristics of the project, participants' satisfaction and project performance with the whole project participants. The study analyzed correlations between individual level (team members) and group level (development team), and examined what effect a sub project manager under complicated hierarchical organization of the large-scale project, namely PL (project leader)'s leadership style had on each individual project participant's satisfaction and what effect project uncertainty in organization/technology environment had on project participants' satisfaction and project performance. The study verified that development team (group) had an effect on team member (individual)-level project participants' satisfaction by disclosing that there was a significant dispersion among groups within project participants' satisfaction by each individual. It is analyzed that it is necessary to make improvement through approach by each pertinent team to raise individual-level project participants' satisfaction. The study also verified PL's ideal leadership under strict methodology and hierarchical control of the large-scale project. Based on the verification of the hypotheses, the results of the analysis were produced as follows. First, the development team affects the satisfaction level that an individual has when he/she participates in a project. This suggests that the satisfaction with project participation should be improved at the team level. In addition, the project management style and leadership orientation of the manager of a sub project who is mostly affected by the team proved to have a direct influence on the satisfaction with project participation and project performances. Second, both the performance-oriented leadership and the relationship-oriented leadership of the PL of the development team were verified to have a significant effect on the satisfaction of the team members associated with project participation. In other words, when the team members recognize that the PL of the development team shows both the performance-oriented leadership and the relationship-oriented leadership, their satisfaction with project participation increases accordingly. Third, it was verified that the uncertainty of the organizational environment significantly affects the satisfaction level when the PL of the development team exerts a relationship-oriented and performance-oriented leadership. The higher the uncertainty of the organizational environment is, the more the satisfaction with project participation decreases whereas the relationship-oriented leadership has a more positive effect on the satisfaction than the performance-oriented leadership style. Fourth, when the PL of the development team exerts the relationship-related and performance-related leadership, the uncertainty of the technological environment has a significant influence on the satisfaction level. The higher the uncertainty of the technological environment is, the more the satisfaction with project participation decreases whereas the performance-oriented leadership has a more positive effect on the satisfaction than the relationship-oriented leadership style. The result of the research on the uncertainty of the project environment suggests that when the development team leader exerts a relationship-oriented and performance-oriented leadership style, the uncertainty of the organizational environment has a significant effect on the satisfaction with project participation; the higher the uncertainty of the organizational environment, the more the satisfaction level decreases, and the relationship-oriented leadership style affects the satisfaction level more positively than the performance-oriented leadership style. In addition, when the development team leader displays a relationship-oriented and performance-oriented leadership style, the uncertainty of the technological environment has a significant effect on the satisfaction with project participation; the higher the uncertainty of the technological environment. the more the satisfaction level decreases. The performance-oriented leadership style as well affects the satisfaction level more positively than the relationship-oriented leadership style. Based on the above results, the research provides the following implications when handling multiple concurrent projects. First, the satisfaction with the participation in the multiple concurrent projects needs to be enhanced at the team (group) level. Second. the manager of the project team, particularly the middle managers should have both a performance-oriented and relationship (task and human)-oriented attitude and exert a consolidated leadership in order to improve the satisfaction of team members with project participation and their performances. Third, as the uncertainty factor of the technological and organizational environment among the characteristics factors of the project has room for methodological improvement depending on one's effort even though there are some complications, we need to continuously prevent and control the risks resulting from the uncertainties of the technological and organizational environment of the project in order to enhance the satisfaction of project participation and project performances. Fourth, the performance (task)-oriented leadership is required when there is uncertainty in a technological environment while the relationship (human)-oriented leadership is required when there is uncertainty in an organizational environment. This research has the following limitations. First, this research intended to select one large-sized sample project and measure the project characteristics, the satisfaction of all the participants associated with project participation, and their performances. Therefore, it is inappropriate to generalize and apply the result of this result onto other numerous projects. Second, as this case study entailed a survey to measure the characteristics factors and performance of the project, since the result value was based on the perception of project team members, the data may have insufficient objectivity. Third, though this research targeted on all the project participants, some development teams did not provide sufficient data and questionnaires were collected from some specific development teams among the 23 development teams, causing a significant deviation in the response rate among the development teams. Therefore, we need to continuously conduct the follow-up researches making comparisons among the multiple projects, and centering on the characteristics factors of the project and its satisfaction level.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.72-105
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 전북 완주군 동상면 대아리 산1-2번지의 도유림인 속칭 가막골 금낭화군락지의 천연보호구역적 가치를 검토하는 한편 금낭화군락지의 적정 생육환경을 구명하고 이를 바탕으로 금낭화군락지의 보전을 위한 기초자료를 제공할 목적으로 시도 되었다. 이를 위해 문헌 및 인터넷조사를 통해 '금낭화의 형태적 생태적 특성'과 '국내 천연기념물 초본군락의 지정현황 및 문제점'을 살펴보는 한편 현지조사를 통해 금낭화군락의 광환경, 토양환경, 식생조건 등을 조사 분석하여 가막골 금낭화군락지의 천연보호구역적 가치를 파악하고자 한 연구 결과는 아래와 같다. 국내 금낭화 자생군락지를 분석한 결과, 금낭화는 전국의 산지에 고루 분포되고 있으며 이 중 완주 가막골 금낭화군락지의 서식규모는 매우 큰 것으로 나타났다. 또한 금낭화군락지 분포에 대한 문헌 및 현지조사 결과, 준고냉지에서 생육이 월등하며, 생육왕성기인 5월의 풍부한 강수량은 금낭화 생육에 매우 필수적인 것으로 보아 가막골 금낭화군락지는 매우 전형적 기상여건을 보이는 서식지라 판단된다. 한편 금낭화 고밀도분포 군락의 환경 분석 결과, 전석지(轉石地) 토양을 기반으로 고도 300~375m의 범위에 있었으며 평균고도는 344.5m이고 자생지의 좌향(坐向)은 북향 또는 북서향도 포함되나 북동향(NE)이 압도적이었으며 평균 경사는 $19.5^{\circ}$로 나타났다. 또한 광조건 분석 결과, 4월부터 8월까지 생육기간인 5개월간 군락 내 광도는 평균 30,810Lux 이었으며, 생육 초기에는 낮았고 후기로 갈수록 광도는 상승하는 경향이었다. 금낭화 자생조건은 4~5월 생육기에는 약 14,000~18,000Lux 정도의 광조건이었으며, 개화 이후에는 상대적으로 광도 증가와는 관련 없이 결실이 이루어지는 것으로 판단된다. 토양환경 분석 결과, 토양산도(pH)는 표토, 5.2~6.1, 심토, 5.2~6.2로 거의 유사한 범위를 보였으며 표토의 평균 토양pH는 5.54, 심토는 5.58로 이 조건은 비교대상 군락지와 거의 유사하고 전형성이 큰 것으로 추정됨에 따라 가막골의 토양 안정성은 매우 높다고 판단된다. 식생환경 분석 결과, 조사구별 금낭화의 개체수는 13~52개체까지 심한 편차를 보였으나 군락내 발견된 분류군(taxa)은 총 126종류로 순수군락을 유지하면서도 높은 종다양성이 확인되었다. 그리고 대아수목원 금낭화군락지는 금낭화, 미나리냉이, 거북꼬리, 이삭여귀, 물봉선 등이 우점하는 식물사회로 확인되었으며 군락내 식별종(Differential species)은 물봉선, 꼭두서니, 칡, 산딸기와 고추나무, 광대싸리, 개다래로 밝혀짐에 따라 지형 및 토양습도에 따라 전형적 하위군락으로 구분되는 것으로 판단된다. 이와 같은 결과를 종합할 때, 완주군 동상면 대아리 가막골 금낭화군락지는 탁월한 관상성을 가진 자생식물의 서식처임을 확인할 수 있고, 본 군락은 전국분포상의 금낭화 자생군락으로는 국내 최대 규모로 추정되며 기상 및 지형, 토양조건과 식생환경이 군락지의 지속적인 생육 환경을 보장할 수 있는 매우 탁월한 서식지로 판단된다. 따라서 전형적 서식조건과 지속가능성이 큰 가막골 금낭화군락은 당연히 천연보호구역적 가치가 매우 큰 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제70권1호
• /
• pp.7-16
• /
• 1985

임목(林木)의 주체성인(主體成因)인 수간(樹幹)에 대한 각종(各種) 성장인자간(成長因子間)의 정준상관(正準相關)과 그의 관계적(關係的) 배경(背景) 및 수간(樹幹)의 총합적(總合的)인 변동분석(變動分析)에 의(依)한 수간적(樹幹的) 특징(特徵)을 파악(把握)함에 있어, 그의 최적기법(最適技法)을 탐색(探索)하기 위한 시도(試圖)로서 일본(日本)잎갈나무(Larix leptolepis)에 주성분(主成分) 및 정준상관분석법(正準相關分析法)을 도입적용(導入適用)하고, 얻어진 결과(結果)를 다음과 같이 요약(要約)한다. 1) 정형수(正形數)($x_8$)를 제외(除外)한 모든 성장인자(成長因子) 즉(卽), 수고(樹高)($x_1$), 지하고(枝下高)($x_2$), 망고(望高)($x_3$), 흉고직경(胸高直徑)($x_4$), 중앙직경(中央直徑)($x_5$), 수관폭(樹冠幅)($x_6$) 및 간재적(幹材積)($x_7$) 등(等)의 각(各) 인자간(因子間)에 강약간(強弱間)의 상관(相關)이 있으며, 특(特)히 흉고직경(胸高直徑), 수고(樹高) 및 중앙직경(中央直徑) 등(等)은 간재적(幹材積)과 고도(高度)의 상관(相關)이 있다(표(表) l 참조(參照)). 2) (1) 상장성장인자(上長成長因子)인 수고(樹高), 지하고(枝下高) 및 망고(望高) 등(等)의 합성변량(合成變量)과 간재적간(幹材積間), (2) 비대성장인자(肥大成長因子)인 흉고직경(胸高直徑), 중앙직경(中央直徑) 및 수관폭(樹冠幅) 등(等)의 합성변량(合成變量)과 간재적간(幹材積間), (3) 상장(上長) 및 비대성장인자(肥大成長因子)를 총망라(總網羅)한 6개인자(個因子)의 합성변량(合成變量)과 간재적간(幹材積間)의 정준상관계수(正準相關係數)와 정준변량(正準變量)이 각각(各各) $${(1)\;{\gamma}_{u1,v1}=0.82980^{**},\;\{u_1=1.00000x_7\\v_1=1.08323x_1-0.04299x_2-0.07080x_3}\\{(2)\;{\gamma}_{u1,v1}=0.98198^{**},\;\{u_1=1.00000x_7\\v_1=0.86433x_4+0.11996x_5+0.02917x_6}\\{(3)\;{\gamma}_{u1,v1}=0.98700^{**},\;\{u_1=1.00000x_7\\v1=0.12948x_1+0.00291x_2+0.03076x_3+0.76707x_4+0.09107x_5+0.02576x_6}$$ 등(等)과 같이 되어, 어느 경우(境遇)에서도 고도(高度)의 정준상관(正準相關)을 가지며, (1)의 경우(境遇)에는 수고(樹高)가, (2)의 경우(境遇)에는 흉고직경(胸高直徑)이, (3)의 경우(境遇)에는 흉고직경(胸高直徑)과 수고(樹高)가 각각(各各)의 정준상관(正準相關)에 절대적인 기여(寄與)를 하는 것으로서, 각종(各種) 질적성장(質的成長)의 총합특성(總合特性)은 이들 인자(因子)의 막강한 영향력(影響力)에 의해서 형성(形成)되며, 특(特)히 (3)의 경우에서 간재적(幹材積)과의 정준상관(正準相關)에 미치는 흉고직경(胸高直徑)의 영향력(影響力)은 기타(其他)의 인자(因子)에 비(比)하여 판이(判異)하게 큰 것으로 밝혀지고 있다(표(表) 2 참조(參照)). 3) 상장성장인자(上長成長因子)인 수고(樹高), 지하고(枝下高) 및 망고(望高) 등(等)의 합성변량(合成變量)과 비대성장인자(肥大成長因子)인 흉고직경(胸高直徑), 중앙직경(中央直徑) 및 수관폭(樹冠幅) 등(等)의 합성변량간(合成變量間)의 정준상관계수(正準相關係數)와 정준변량(正準變量)이 $${\gamma}_{u1,v1}=0.78556^{**},\;\{u_1=1.20569x_1-0.04444x_2-0.21696x_3\\v_1=1.09571x_4-0.14076z_5+0.05285z_6$$와 같이 됨에 따라, 각종 상장성장인자(上長成長因子)와 비대성장인자간(肥大成長因子間)의 고도(高度)의 정준상관(正準相關)에 있어 수고(樹高)와 흉고직경(胸高直徑)만의 기여도(寄與度)가 극(極)히 현저한 것으로서, 상장성장(上長成長)의 총합특성(總合特性)은 수고(樹高)에 의해서, 비대성장(肥大成長)의 총합특성(總合特性)은 흉고직경(胸高直徑)에 의해서 각각(各各) 형성(形成)된다는 사실(事實)이 확인(確認)된 것이다. 따라서 양인자(兩因子)에 대한 간재적계측(幹材積計測)에 있어서의 필수유력인(必須有力因子)로서의 과학성(科學性)이 입증(立證)된 것이라 생각한다(표(表) 2 참조(參照)). 4) 수간(樹幹)의 8개성장인자(個成長因子) 즉(卽), 8차원(次元)의 정보(情報)(특성치(特性値))를 설정(設定)된 유효목표(有效目標) 85%에 따라 3차원(次元)으로 간략화(簡約化)된 총합특성치(總合特性値) 즉(卽), 제(第) 1 ~ 제(第) 3 주성분(主成分)은 다음과 같다. 제(第) 1 주성분(主成分)($Z_1$); $Z_1=0.40192x_1+0.23693x_2+0.37047x_3+0.41745x_4+0.41629x_5+0.33454x_60.42798x_7+0.04923x_8$ 제(第) 2 주성분(主成分)($Z_2$) ; $z_2=-0.09306x_1-0.34707x_2+0.08372x_3-0.03239x_4+0.11152x_5+0.00012x_6+0.02407x_7+0.92185x_8$ 제(第) 3 주성분(主成分)($Z_3$) ; $Z_3=0.19832x_1+0.68210x_2+0.35824x_3-0.22522x_4-0.20876x_5-0.42373x_6-0.15055x_7+0.26562x_8$ 제(第) 1 주성분(主成分)($Z_1$)은 기여율(寄與率)이 63.26%나 되는 매우 높은 정보흡수력(情報吸收力)을 가진 "크기의 인자(因子)(size factor)"로서, 그의 주성분득점(主成分得點)(principal component score)은 인자부하량(因子負荷量)이 매우 높은 간재적(幹材積), 흉고직경(胸高直徑), 중앙직경(中央直徑) 및 수고(樹高) 등(等)에 의해써 결정(決定)되며, 제(第) 2 주성분(主成分)($Z_2$)은 입체적(立體的) 형상(形狀)의 지표(指標) 즉(卽), 수간(樹幹)의 입체적(立體的) 상사성(相似性)과 완구도(完溝度)를 나타내주는 "형상(形狀)의 인자(因子)(shape factor)"로서, 그의 score는 정형수(正形數)의 절대적(絶對的)인 영향력(影響力)에 의(依)해서 형성(形成)되며, 제(第) 3 주성분(主成分)($Z_3$)은 상장성장(上長成長)과 비대성장(肥大成長)과의 역관계(逆關係)의 현상(現象) 즉(卽), 수간(樹幹)의 세장(細長)(또는 굵고 짧음)의 정도를 표시(表示)하는 성장형상(成長形狀)의 지표(指標)로서, 이는 제(第) 2의 "형상(形狀)의 인자(因子)"가 된다. 이상(以上) 3개주성분(個主成分)은 그의 누적기여율(累積寄與率)이 88.36%로서 만족스러운 정보흡수역량(情報吸收力量)을 지니고 있다(표(表) 3 참조(參照)). 5) 본(本) 연구(硏究)에 적용(適用)된 주성분(主成分) 및 정준(正準) 상관분석법(相關分析法)은 적극적(積極的)인 이용개발(利用開發)에 따라서는 삼림계측(森林計測)(임목성장(林木成長)), 지위판정분류(地位判定分類), 삼림(森林) 및 임산업(林産業)의 경영진단(經營診斷), 임산가공(林産加工)(품(品))의 생산관리(生産管理) 및 기지(其地) 총합특성치(總合特性値)의 산정(算定)을 필요(必要)로 하는 분야(分野)에 많은 기여(寄與)가 있을 것으로 사료(思料)된다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.83-104
• /
• 1981

Hemodialysis is essential treatment for the chronic renal failure patient's long-term cure and for the patient management before and after kidney transplantation. It sustains the endstage renal failure patient's life which didn't get well despite strict regimen and furthermore it becomes an essential treatment to maintain civil life. Bursing implementation in hemodialysis may affect the significant effect on patient's life. The purpose of this study was to obtain the basic data to solve the hypotension problem encountable to patient and the blood loss problem affecting hemodialysis patient'a anemic states by incomplete rinsing of blood in coil through all process of hemodialysis. The subjects for this study were 44 patients treated hemodialysis 691 times in the hemodialysis unit, The .data was collected at Gang Nam 51. Mary's Hospital from January 1, 1981 to April 30, 1981 by using the direct observation method and the clinical laboratory test for laboratory data and body weight and was analysed by the use of analysis of Chi-square, t-test and anlysis of varience. The results obtained an follows; A. On clinical laboratory data and other data by dialysis Procedure. The average initial body weight was 2.37 ± 0.97kg, and average body weight after every dialysis was 2.33 ± 0.9kg. The subject's average hemoglobin was 7.05±1.93gm/dl and average hematocrit was 20.84± 3.82%. Average initial blood pressure was 174.03±23,75mmHg and after dialysis was 158.45±25.08mmHg. The subject's average blood ion due to blood sample for laboratory data was 32.78±13.49cc/ month. The subject's average blood replacement for blood complementation was 1.31 ±0.88 pint/ month for every patient. B. On the hypotensive state and the coping approaches occurrence rate of hypotension was 28.08%. It was 194 cases among 691 times. 1. In degrees of initial blood pressure, the most 36.6% was in the group of 150-179mmHg, and in degrees of hypotension during dialysis, the most 28.9% in the group of 40-50mmHg, especially if the initial blood pressure was under 180mmHg, 59.8% clinical symptoms appeared in the group of“above 20mmHg of hypotension”. If initial blood pressure was above 180mmHg, 34.2% of clinical symptoms were appeared in the group of“above 40mmHg of hypotension”. These tendencies showed the higher initial blood pressure and the stronger degree of hypotension, these results showed statistically singificant differences. (P=0.0000) 2. Of the occuring times of hypotension,“after 3 hrs”were 29.4%, the longer the dialyzing procedure, the stronger degree of hypotension ann these showed statistically significant differences. (P=0.0142). 3. Of the dispersion of symptoms observed, sweat and flush were 43.3%, and Yawning, and dizziness 37.6%. These were the important symptoms implying hypotension during hemodialysis accordingly. Strages of procedures in coping with hypotension were as follows ; 45.9% were recovered by reducing the blood flow rate from 200cc/min to 1 00cc/min, and by reducing venous pressure to 0-30mmHg. 33.51% were recovered by controling (adjusting) blood flow rate and by infusion of 300cc of 0,9% Normal saline. 4.1% were recovered by infusion of over 300cc of 0.9% normal saline. 3.6% by substituting Nor-epinephiine, 5.7% by substituting blood transfusion, and 7,2% by substituting Albumin were recovered. And the stronger the degree of symptoms observed in hypotention, the more the treatments required for recovery and these showed statistically significant differences (P=0.0000). C. On the effects of the changes of blood pressure and osmolality by albumin and hemofiltration. 1. Changes of blood pressure in the group which didn't required treatment in hypotension and the group required treatment, were averaged 21.5mmHg and 44.82mmHg. So the difference in the latter was bigger than the former and these showed statistically significant difference (P=0.002). On the changes of osmolality, average mean were 12.65mOsm, and 17.57mOsm. So the difference was bigger in the latter than in the former but these not showed statistically significance (P=0.323). 2. Changes of blood pressure in the group infused albumin and in the group didn't required treatment in hypotension, were averaged 30mmHg and 21.5mmHg. So there was no significant differences and it showed no statistical significance (P=0.503). Changes of osmolality were averaged 5.63mOsm and 12.65mOsm. So the difference was smaller in the former but these was no stitistical significance (P=0.287). Changes of blood pressure in the group infused Albumin and in the group required treatment in hypotension were averaged 30mmHg and 44.82mmHg. So the difference was smaller in the former but there is no significant difference (P=0.061). Changes of osmolality were averaged 8.63mOsm, and 17.59mOsm. So the difference were smaller in the former but these not showed statistically significance (P=0.093). 3. Changes of blood pressure in the group iutplemented hemofiltration and in the Uoup didn't required treatment in hypotension were averaged 22mmHg and 21.5mmHg. So there was no significant differences and also these showed no statistical significance (P=0.320). Changes of osmolality were averaged 0.4mOsm and 12.65mOsm. So the difference was smaller in the former but these not showed statistical significance（P=0.199). Changes of blood pressure in the group implemented hemofiltration and in the group required treatment in hypotension were averaged 22mmHg and 44.82mmHg. So the difference was smatter in the former and these showed statistically significant differences (P=0.035). Changes of osmolality were averaged 0.4mOsm and 17.59mOsm. So the difference was smaller in the former but these not showed statistical significance (P=0.086). D. On the changes of body weight, and blood pressure, between the group of hemofiltration and hemodialysis. 1, Changes of body weight in the group implemented hemofiltration and hemodialysis were averaged 3.340 and 3.320. So there was no significant differences and these showed no statistically significant difference, (P=0.185) but standard deviation of body weight averaged in comparison with standard difference of body weight was statistically significant difference (P=0.0000). Change of blood Pressure in the group implemented hemofiltration and hemodialysis were averaged 17.81mmHg and 19.47mmHg. So there was no significant differences and these showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.119), But in comparison with standard deviation about difference of blood pressure was statistically significant difference. (P=0.0000). E. On the blood infusion method in coil after hemodialysis and residual blood losing method in coil. 1, On comparing and analysing Hct of residual blood in coil by factors influencing blood infusion method. Infusion method of saline 200cc reduced residual blood in coil after the quantitative comparison of Saline Occ, 50cc, 100cc, 200cc and the differences showed statistical significance (p < 0.001). Shaking Coil method reduced residual blood in Coil in comparison of Shaking Coil method and Non-Shaking Coil method this showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Adjusting pressure in Coil at OmmHg method reduced residual blood in Coil in comparison of adjusting pressure in Coil at OmmHg and 200mmHg, and this showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). 2. Comparing blood infusion method divided into 10 methods in Coil with every factor respectively, there was seldom difference in group of choosing Saline 100cc infusion between Coil at OmmHg. The measured quantity of blood loss was averaged 13.49cc. Shaking Coil method in case of choosing saline 50cc infusion while adjusting pressure in coil at OmmHg was the most effective to reduce residual blood. The measured quantity of blood loss was averaged 15.18cc.