• 대한임상검사과학회지
• /
• 제54권2호
• /
• pp.157-162
• /
• 2022

본 술기의 목적은 운동피질 주변에 발생한 뇌종양 환자의 수술에서 TceMEP로 인해 발생하는 위양성을 방지하고 수술 중 운동영역의 정확한 매핑과 피질척수로 보존하기 위함이다. 또한 검사과정에서 발생하는 시행착오를 줄이고 검사시간을 최소화하여 검사결과에 대한 빠른 피드백으로 수술하는 의사에게 정확한 정보를 전달함에 있다. 본 술기의 가장 중요한 요소는 첫번째로 일정 세기의 자극역치로 검사해야 하는 것과 두번째로는 일정 수준의 마취농도를 적정 수준으로 유지하는 것이 수술 중 발생하는 위양성을 막는 기본적이 요소이다. 세번째로는 수술하는 반대쪽 부위에 다중 채널을 이용한 기록전극의 설치로 최대한 많은 근육에서 TceMEP파형과 집접피질자극 및 직접피질하 자극에 대한 반응을 측정하는 것이다. 이런 조건들이 수술이 진행되는 동안 원활하게 유지된다면 검사에서 오는 위양성이 아닌 그 밖의 요인들에서 발생할 수 있는 원인들을 예측할 수 있다.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제29권7호
• /
• pp.954-958
• /
• 2000

In the removal of small subcortical lesion in the eloquent area like sensory-motor cortex, the prevention of neurologic deficit is important. We present our technique of identification of M-1, S-1 cortex in a case of subcortical granuloma located in sensorymotor cortex. To accurately localize mass, stereotactic craniotomy was planned. At the beginning of procedure, functional MRI of motor cortex was done with stereotactic headframe in place. Next, the stereotactic craniotomy about 4 cm was done under propofol anesthesia for cortical mapping. After reflection of dura, central sulcus was identified with phase-reversal response of intraoperative SEP(somatosensory evoked potential) of contralateral median nerve. Then the patient was awakened, and direct cortical stimulation was done. We observed the muscle contractions of elbow, hand and fingers and the paresthesia over forearm, hand, fingers on the M-1 and S-1 cortex. Through cortical mapping and stereotactic guidance, we concluded that the mass lie immediately posterior to central sulcus, then the mass was carefully removed through small transsulcal approach, opening about 1 cm of rolandic sulcus.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제61권3호
• /
• pp.363-375
• /
• 2018

Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) utilizes electrophysiological techniques as a surrogate test and evaluation of nervous function while a patient is under general anesthesia. They are increasingly used for procedures, both surgical and endovascular, to avoid injury during an operation, examine neurological tissue to guide the surgery, or to test electrophysiological function to allow for more complete resection or corrections. The application of IOM during pediatric brain tumor resections encompasses a unique set of technical issues. First, obtaining stable and reliable responses in children of different ages requires detailed understanding of normal age-adjusted brain-spine development. Neurophysiology, anatomy, and anthropometry of children are different from those of adults. Second, monitoring of the brain may include risk to eloquent functions and cranial nerve functions that are difficult with the usual neurophysiological techniques. Third, interpretation of signal change requires unique sets of normative values specific for children of that age. Fourth, tumor resection involves multiple considerations including defining tumor type, size, location, pathophysiology that might require maximal removal of lesion or minimal intervention. IOM techniques can be divided into monitoring and mapping. Mapping involves identification of specific neural structures to avoid or minimize injury. Monitoring is continuous acquisition of neural signals to determine the integrity of the full longitudinal path of the neural system of interest. Motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials are representative methodologies for monitoring. Free-running electromyography is also used to monitor irritation or damage to the motor nerves in the lower motor neuron level : cranial nerves, roots, and peripheral nerves. For the surgery of infratentorial tumors, in addition to free-running electromyography of the bulbar muscles, brainstem auditory evoked potentials or corticobulbar motor evoked potentials could be combined to prevent injury of the cranial nerves or nucleus. IOM for cerebral tumors can adopt direct cortical stimulation or direct subcortical stimulation to map the corticospinal pathways in the vicinity of lesion. IOM is a diagnostic as well as interventional tool for neurosurgery. To prove clinical evidence of it is not simple. Randomized controlled prospective studies may not be possible due to ethical reasons. However, prospective longitudinal studies confirming prognostic value of IOM are available. Furthermore, oncological outcome has also been shown to be superior in some brain tumors, with IOM. New methodologies of IOM are being developed and clinically applied. This review establishes a composite view of techniques used today, noting differences between adult and pediatric monitoring.