• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.682-700
• /
• 2012

Over the last several years, Korea has increasingly adopted design-build for public construction projects. There is a much greater awareness of the need to change to a system based on 'Value for Money', which is high on the government's agenda. A whole life performance bid evaluation model is proposed to aid decision makers in the selection of a design-builder. This is based on the integration of a framework using an analytic hierarchy process, as the bid awarding system is being changed from one based on the lowest price to one based on best value over the life-cycle. Key criteria such as whole life cost, service life planning and design quality are important through the key stages of the evaluation process. The model uses a systematic and holistic approach, which enables the public sector client to make better decisions in design-builder selection, which will deliver whole life benefits based on long-term cost-effectiveness.

• Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.16-23
• /
• 2016

The use of inappropriate procurement methods to deliver construction projects has long been acknowledged as a major source of poor project performance and is particularly problematic for the Libyan Construction Industry. Poor procurement method selection has been recognised as a major contributory factor to frequent time and cost overruns. This paper offers a way of selecting specific procurement methods to maximize successful project performance. The methodology involves an intensive review of relevant literature, followed by a semi-structured questionnaire survey. The key findings of the study reveal that 11 out of its 12 common selection criteria exhibit a significant contribution to one or more project performance criteria (time, cost and quality). Project clients should therefore prioritise these criteria when selecting a design-bid-build method. Knowledge of the criteria that contribute positively to project performance will also enable clients to work out, prior to and during construction, the best measures and provisions for successful project outcomes.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 9th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.669-677
• /
• 2022

In this paper, different types of traditional project delivery methods in the construction industry were explored and a comparative analysis against Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) were performed. The advantages of IPD method for all parties, owner/engineer/architect/general contractor, were explored by reviewing the most recent literature. The literature suggests that IPD method should be the dominating project delivery method and diluting the conventional methods such as Design-Bid-Build due to more collaborative and mutually beneficial ways of doing construction; IPD is newer and a more comprehensive method to capture the intrinsic values of project collaboration. This paper presents a comparison of the commonly used methods of project delivery, Design-bid-build, CMAR, & Design-Build and addresses their advantages and disadvantages in differing project scopes and sizes. Several industry leaders with experience in the four types of project delivery addressed were surveyed. The survey results show an overwhelming desire for future projects to go toward IPD from the contractor/owner/RDP. The biggest obstacle facing a project from using IPD appears to be trust.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회 1부
• /
• pp.207-209
• /
• 2011

Numerous reports show that alternative project delivery systems (PDSs) such as design-build (DB), construction management at risk (CMR), and design-build-maintain (DBM) are increasingly used in many countries. This study compared characteristics of each PDS (design-bid-build (DBB), DB, CMR, or DBM) by analyzing quantitative data from 9 research articles. In order to compare characteristics between DBB and alternative PDSs, the study is based on principal 3 factors - Time, Cost, and Quality. DB shows the best performance in the time part and also the cost performance depending on facility type and project size. The performance of quality has minor difference among different PDSs. These results support the fact that using an appropriate PDS by the characteristic of a project makes high value of efficiency and productivity.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2009년 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.211-216
• /
• 2009

Bidding systems in the domestic public construction work have been amended many times since the lowest-bidding system was implemented in 1951. However, this hasn't had much success. Competition in technical development among companies has declined as the contracts for buildings are given to company which submits the lowest price without considering traits of projects. In addition, as the construction market turns to the limitless competition system due to FTA(Free Trade Agreement), advanced techniques are needed to promote the national competitive power. Considering the needs of the times, Korean government announced that "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contracts (Design-Build)" are included to 4 existing bidding systems in October 2007. Thus this study aims to suggest devised the evaluation criteria including major items for evaluating bidders, in order to establish and revitalize the best-value bid system successfully.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.52-60
• /
• 2018

우리나라의 공공건설공사는 입찰을 통해 공사를 발주하고 있으나 하지만 입찰의 특성상 참여자들간의 담합이 발생할 수 있다. 이에 따른 입찰담합은 발주자에게 손해를 가하는바, 이를 배상할 수 있도록 적절한 가상경쟁가격을 산정해야 한다. 이와 관련하여 계량경제학적 방법이 일반적으로 활용되고 있으나 건설공사, 특히 설계 시공일괄입찰의 특성상 여러 한계와 쟁점이 발생할 수밖에 없다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 설계 시공일괄입찰에서 합리적인 가상경쟁가격을 추정할 수 있는 방안을 제안한다. 이는 입찰 참가자가 제출한 설계도서로부터 한계비용을 도출하고, 입찰 참가자의 기술 수준과 경쟁업체의 기술 수준 및 입찰 형태에 따라 입찰율에 따른 요인을 검토하여 가상경쟁가격을 추정하는 방법이다. 본 연구에서 제안한 방법을 토대로 설계 시공일괄입찰 낙찰자 결정 방식의 특성이 반영된 합리적인 가격이 도출될 수 있으며, 답함에 따른 손해액 산정뿐만 아니라 실제 입찰 과정에서의 참고자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이라 판단된다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 9th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.11-17
• /
• 2022

Design-bid-build (DBB) is the most common project delivery method among highway projects. State Highway Agencies (SHAs) usually apply a low-bid approach to select contractors for their DBB projects. In this approach, the Federal Highway Agency suggests SHAs heighten contractors' competition to lower bid prices. However, these attempts may become ineffective due to collusive bidding arrangements among certain contractors. One common strategy is the rotation of winning bidders of a group of contractors who bid on many of the same projects. These arrangements may also be specific to a particular region or vary in time. Despite the practices' adverse effects on bidding outcomes, an effective model to detect red-flag bidding patterns is lacking. This study fills the gap by proposing a novel framework that utilizes pattern mining techniques and statistical tests for unusual pattern detection. A case study with historical data from an SHA is conducted to illustrate the proposed framework.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.86-96
• /
• 2015

기존연구에서 Design-Build(이하 "DB")가 Design-Bid-Build(이하 "DBB")발주방식보다 비용측면에서 우월하다고 하는 이유는 설계변경이 적기 때문이다. 그러나 만약 DBB가 낙찰률이 낮아 이것을 만회하기 위해 설계변경을 발생시켰다면, DB가 설계변경이 적기 때문에 우월하다는 것은 잘못된 판단이다. 따라서 이러한 판단의 오류를 확인하기 위해 발주방식과 설계변경, 혹은 낙찰률과 설계변경의 영향관계만 분석하던 두 종류의 연구들을 종합적으로 분석하는 것을 시도했다. 또한 경로분석기법을 통해 프로젝트 타입 별로 발주방식과 낙찰률이 설계변경에 미치는 효과크기를 동시에 비교함으로써 낙찰률의 매개효과를 검증하였다. 그 결과 특정 프로젝트 타입에서는 발주방식과 설계변경 사이에 낙찰률이 개입하여 매개효과를 발생시키고 있으므로, DB가 DBB보다 설계변경이 적기 때문에 우월하다고 판단할 수 없음을 검증하였다. 이로써 발주방식이 낙찰률을 통해 설계변경에 작용하는 원리를 밝히고, 낙찰률의 정체성을 기존 연구와는 다른 관점에서 규명하였다. 이를 바탕으로 프로젝트 특성에 따른 매개효과를 고려한 발주방식 선정과 성과측정에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이라고 기대한다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.332-337
• /
• 2013

Various project delivery methods have been utilized by owners over the years to maximize project performance. The design-build delivery method is being increasingly used due to the advantages it can offer to an engineering construction industry. Numerous studies have advocated the use of design/build over the traditional design/bid/build delivery approach. This study represents comprehensive analysis of 40 projects from the construction industry and shows that design/build method may not provide all the benefits to project performance. This study found timesaving was a definitive advantage of design/build project delivery, but the positive effects of cost changes was not convincing. Based on the results of the study, the project management expertise and experience of the contractor may have a greater impact on project performance outcomes than focusing on project delivery strategy only.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 9th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.18-24
• /
• 2022

State highway agencies (SHAs) typically apply a competitive procurement procedure to select contractors for their design-bid-build projects. Since the level of competition affects construction bid prices and project outcomes, the Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) suggests SHAs seek ways to improve competition among contractors continuously. However, they rarely conduct an empirical assessment of the current competition level necessary to identify room for improvement. Besides the number of bidders on a project, other factors such as winning or losing rates among the contractors in previous projects can also indicate the degree of competition; only a few contractors may have won the majority of the projects in a specific region. However, few studies have investigated such factors. This paper proposes a network analysis-based approach to evaluating contractor competition levels of highway projects using historical bid tabulation data. The proposed method provides insights into overall competition levels, the determination of competitive contractors, and winning rate distribution among contractors.