• 생물환경조절학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.174-186
• /
• 1996

This study was carried out in order to understand the plan, design, constructing and actual condition of management of modernized horticultural facilities in Kyungpook Province which had been constructed from 1992 to 1995 funded by Government support. The aim of this study is to provide reference data for success of the forth project. It was performed by making up a question about driving of project and management condition of equipment after constructing. The results obtained from this study are as follows: 1. 73.5% of facilities horticulture farmhouse recognized that the prospect of greenhouse is bright, but 92.5% of the farmhouse also recognised that they need technical consultation on protected horticulture farming. Therefore, technical educations would must be enhanced about foundation of greenhouse and cultivation technique. 2. The holding times of explanatory meetings, cause of understanding to farmhouse, were one or two times in greenhouse construction, and 62.5% of the farmhouse expressed the insufficiency at the explanation and educational data. For this reason, it was judged that the construction contract had been delayed more than 5 months in 49.3% of the farmhouse after the decision of project budget. 3. In constructing after a contract, the rates of construction delay is 53.4% and defect occurrence is 41.1%. The biggest reasons of construction delay was insufficiency of worker and materials supply. Each percentage is 29.1%. And the reason of defect occurrence is badness of machinery equipment(62.9% ). 4. In management of greenhouse, a pipe-constructed plastic film greenhouse changes plastic film every one and three years because of sticking dust on plastic film. It was needed to about in cleaning technique of coverings. Because that used 3-5 years only half of the expected life span. 5. The order of broken rating in the subsidiary equipment is like this lollop ventilator (42.8%), a general control system(33.3%) especially, in the case of a general control system, the rate of all family can control is 52.7%. so, it is time to develop easy control equipment which every one could use as soon as possible. 6. When choose heat generator as decide capacity, the most priority is the mount of heat generator the percent is 45.5% heat generator and as decide model, the private purchase's percent is 77.3%. It is higher than a public bidding heat generator the percent is 22.7% heat generator when it compare with a public bidding. In the case of $CO_2$ generator, using rate is only 19.0%. The using rate is very low, so it needs education how to use depends on the way of the subsidiary equipment. 7. In the case of seedlings, it is asked to use factory-processed seedling effectively. because it's difficult to get security of labors(58.8%), hoped crops (55.9%) access same crops(29.4%) much more and changing of crops depends on market situation. that is the main reason the lack of knowhow.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.131-159
• /
• 2014

Corporate rebranding has been evident in the qualitative corporate rebranding studies as an imposed organizational change that induces mixed reactions and ambivalent attitudes among consumers. Corporate rebranding for the established and familiar corporate brands leads to more ambivalent attitudes as these companies represent larger targets for disparaging information. Consumers are found to hold both positive and negative reactions toward companies and brands that they are familiar with. Nevertheless, the imposed change assumption and ambivalent attitude, in particular corporate rebranding, have never been widely explored in the quantitative corporate rebranding studies. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive empirical examination of the ambivalence towards rebrandingrebranded brand attitude-purchase intention relationships. The author proposes that corporate rebranding for familiar corporate brands is a double-edged sword that not only raises the expectation for better performance, but also induces conflicted and ambivalent attitudes among consumers. These consumers' ambivalent attitudes are influenced by both the parent brands-related and general attitude factors which further affect their rebranded brand attitude and purchase intention. A total of 156 useable questionnaires were collected from Malaysian working adults; and two established Malaysian airfreight operators were utilized as the focal parent brands. The study found a significant impact of prior parent brand attitudes on ambivalence towards rebranding (ATR). The parent brand attitudes served as anchors in influencing how new information was processed (Mazaheri et al., 2011; Sherif & Hovland, 1961) and closely related to behavioral intention (Prislin & Quellete, 1996). The ambivalent attitudes experienced were higher when individuals held both positive and negative reactions toward the parent brands. Consumers also held higher ambivalent attitudes when they preferred one of the parent brands; while disliked the other brand. The study also found significant relationships between the lead brand and the rebranded brand attitude; and between the partner brands and ATR. The familiar but controversial partner brand contributed significantly to the ambivalent attitudes experienced; while the more established lead brand had significant impact on the rebranded brand attitude. The lead and partner brands, though both familiar, represented different meanings to consumers. The author attributed these results to the prior parent brand attitudes, the skepticism and their general ambivalence toward the corporate rebranding. Both general attitude factors (i.e. skepticism and general ambivalence towards rebranding) were found to have significant positive impacts on ATR. Skeptical individuals questioned the possibility of a successful rebranding (Chang, 2011) and were more careful with their evaluations toward 'too god to be true' or 'made in heaven' pair of companies. The embedded general ambivalent attitudes that people held toward rebranding could be triggered from the associative network by the ambiguous situation (Prislin & Quellete, 1996). In addition, the ambivalent rebranded brand attitude was found to lower down purchase intention, supporting Hanze (2001), Lavine (2001) and van Harreveld et al. (2009)'s studies. Ambivalent individuals were found to prefer delay decision making by choosing around the mid-ranged points in 'willingness to buy' scale. The study provides several marketing implications. Ambivalence management is proven to be important to corporate rebranding to minimize the ambivalent attitudes experienced. This could be done by carefully controlling the parent brands-related and general attitude factors. The high ambivalent individuals are less confident with their own conflicted attitudes and are motivated to get rid of the psychological discomfort caused by these conflicted attitudes (Bell & Esses, 2002; Lau-Gesk, 2005; van Harreveld et al., 2009). They tend to process information more deeply (Jonas et al., 1997; Maio et al., 2000; Wood et al., 1985) and pay more attention to message that provides convincible arguments. Providing strong, favorable and convincible message is hence effective in alleviating consumers' ambivalent attitudes. In addition, brand name heuristic could be utilized because the rebranding strategy sends important signal to consumers about the changes that happen or going to happen. The ambivalent individuals will pay attention to both brand name heuristic and rebranding message in their effort to alleviate the psychological discomfort caused by ambivalent attitudes. The findings also provide insights to Malaysian and airline operators for a better planning and implementation of corporate rebranding exercise.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제3권4호
• /
• pp.89-116
• /
• 2008

최근 기업은 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅에 핵심 기술이자 신기술 적용 제품인 RFID를 도입하여 재고관리, 공정효율성, 비용절감, 제품의 신뢰성 등을 통해 경영활동의 효율성과 고객 만족도를 향상시키고자 제품을 도입하고 있다. 그러나 신제품(솔루션) 도입 시 기업은 많은 위험요소를 안고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 RFID 구매자들에게 존재하는 구매 위험, 공급자의 속성과 정보, 구매의사결정 단계 및 구매 행동 등 이론적 배경을 근거로 연구문제를 돌출하고 이를 분석하여 시사점을 제시함으로서 RFID 공급사 및 산업마케터들의 마케팅전략을 수립에 도움이 되고자 시작되었다. 연구 결과, (1)신규 구매의 경우 제품의 신뢰성, 기술명세의 정확성, 단순 재구매의 경우 가격의 적절성이 중요한 속성으로 나타났고, (2)정보원천은 두(신규 구매와 단순 재구매) 경우 모두 제품 성능 테스트결과, 조직 내의 기술자, 그리고 타사 구매자들의 의견 및 견본확인 등을 통해 정보를 얻고, (3)구매위험지각 정도는 신규구매의 경우에는 기능상의 문제 발생 가능성과 같은 성과 위험, 수리 및 투자비용 상의 손실 가능성과 같은 재정적 위험 등, 단순재구매의 경우에는 보다 나은 제품 구매에 대한 기회 손실과 같은 미래 기회 손실 위험 등이 나타났고, (4)구매센터의 역할은 신규구매의 경우에는 사용부서, 기획부서 구매부서 순이고, 단순재구매의 경우에는 사용부서, 구매부서 순이며, (5)구매의사결정단계별 영향력은 두 경우 모두 단계별 차이를 보이고 있으나 경영층 보다 사용부서, 기획부서, 구매부서의 비중이 높게 나타났다.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국벤처창업학회 2008년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.257-282
• /
• 2008

최근 기업은 유비쿼터스 컴퓨팅에 핵심 기술이자 신기술 적용 제품인 RFID를 도입하여 재고관리, 공정효율성, 비용절감, 제품의 신뢰성 등을 통해 경영활동의 효율성과 고객만족도를 향상시키고자 제품을 도입하고 있다. 그러나 신제품(솔루션) 도입 시 기업은 많은 위험요소를 안고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 RFID 구매자들에게 존재하는 구매 위험, 공급자의 속성과 정보, 구매의사결정 단계 및 구매 행동 등 이론적 배경을 근거로 가설을 설정하고 이를 분석하여 시사점을 제시함으로서 RFID 공급사 및 산업마케터들의 마케팅전략을 수립에 도움이 되고자 시작되었다. 연구 결과, (1) 신규 구매의 경우 제품의 신뢰성, 기술명세의 정확성, 단순재구매의 경우 가격의 적절성이 중요한 속성으로 나타났고, (2) 정보원천은 두(신규 구매와 단순재구매) 경우 모두 제품 성능 테스트결과, 조직 내의 기술자, 그리고 타사구매자들의 의견 및 견본확인 등을 통해 정보를 얻고, (3) 구매위험지각 정도는 신규구매의 경우에는 기능상의 문제 발생 가능성과 같은 성과 위험, 수리 및 투자비용상의 손실 가능성과 같은 재정적 위험 등, 단순재구매의 경우에는 보다 나은 제품구매에 대한 기회 손실과 같은 미래 기회 손실 위험 등이 나타났고, (4) 구매센터의 역할은 신규구매의 경우에는 사용부서, 기획부서 구매부서 순이고 단순재구매의 경우에는 사용부서, 구매부서 순이적, (5) 구매의사결정단계별 영향력은 두 경우 모두 단계별 차이를 보이고 있으나 경영층 보다 사용부서, 기획부서, 구매부서의 비중이 높게 나타났다.