• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2012년 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.655-666
• /
• 2012

Remodeling is a process which creates a new environment based on the formal building. So we should reflect residents' demands faithfully and complement weak points of the formal building throughly, after grasping many problems, when we have a plan to do a remodeling. This study aims to make decision for remodeling company using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process).

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 2014

많은 엔젤 투자자들이 초기단계기업에 투자하는 것을 주저하고 있다. 초기단계기업은 대부분 매출이 없고, 개발단계이거나 시장진입초기단계인 경우가 많아서 기업 가치를 정량적으로 평가할 수 없기 때문이다. 따라서 엔젤 투자자들이 기업을 평가하고 투자의사를 결정하는 경우 기업가의 성향에 의존 할 수밖에 없는 경우가 많다. 이에 본 연구는 엔젤 투자자의 투자의사결정요인에 영향을 주는 기업가적 특성의 요인과 그 중요도를 도출하였다. 연구방법은 엔젤 투자클럽, 벤처캐피털리스트, 기업 대표 및 임원 등의 엔젤 투자자 전문가 그룹 20인을 선정하여 델파이 기법(Delphi Technique)에 따라 설문조사를 실시하였다. 3차에 걸친 조사 결과 투자의사결정요인 중에서 기업가적 특성에 해당하는 요인으로 신뢰성, 위험감수성, 열정, 인내력, 진실성, 리더십, 창업경험, 조직관리능력, 혁신성, 인맥(네트워크)의 10개의 요소들을 도출하였다. 또한 도출된 기업가적 특성 요소의 중요도를 분석하기 위하여 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 이론에 근거하여 각 요소에 대한 쌍대비교(Pair-wise Comparison)를 통하여, 그 중요도를 분석한 결과 신뢰성(18.1%), 진실성(15.9%), 리더십(11.7%), 조직관리능력(10.0%), 인맥(네트워크)(9.5%), 열정(9.1%), 인내력(8.4%), 혁신성(8.1%), 창업경험(5.3%), 위험감수성(3.9%)의 순으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 의의는 투자자의 투자 의사 결정에 영향을 주는 요인들 중에서 초기 단계의 기업에 가장 큰 영향 요인이라 할 수 있는 기업가적 특성 요인을 도출하여 중요도를 비교함으로써 엔젤 투자의 불확실성으로 인하여 생기는 한계를 다소나마 줄이고, 엔젤 투자자의 판단에 도움을 줄 수 있다는 점이다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.181-190
• /
• 2014

Background: Demands are recently rising for the securement of procedural justification of policy decision-making. This study aims to improve the procedure of making a decision to expand health insurance benefit package from the perspective of building a social consensus. Methods: Major priority principles were firstly derived through literature search. Weights for such principles were calculated through an analytic hierarchy process, based upon the survey conducted for the health policy experts. Priority for 11 non-covered services was assessed by applying the weights as above to the results of the questionnaire survey targeted at people including members of related committees or societies. Results: Weights for priority principles were in the order of 'severity/urgency (0.428)', 'cost-effectiveness (0.318)', 'substitutability (0.164),' and 'accountability (0.090)'. What was obtained by applying these weights to the results of the questionnaire survey was considerably in line with what health experts classified those items into 3 groups depending on their own judgement of service necessity (consistent with 9 services out of 11). Conclusion: Results of the study are suggestive as to how far a brief assessment by experts could be utilized in case there are constraints on time and expenses in implementing all the process to secure procedural justification. Various attempts and endeavors need to be made to secure procedural justification that will not mar efficiency of decision-making in the days to come.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회:발표자료
• /
• pp.369-385
• /
• 2001

A R&D project evaluation method has been applied for the national nuclear R&D projects in a developing-country setting. In the methodology, Saaty's analytic hierarchy process model is used to evaluate and rank of the selected nuclear R&D project which have a wide range of objectives and characteristics. The criteria used for evaluation related specifically to the Korea's evaluation needs and culture, and they are weighted according to their relative importance as perceived by the evaluator of the R&D project. As a real-world case of evaluation, we elicited and reproduced the evaluation process of the nuclear R&D projects which is going under the research process. As the results of the paper suggests, the methodology can be applied to the evaluation of the R&D projects and has much potential.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.145-152
• /
• 2010

Under limited resources such as budgets and experts, it is necessary to make decisions for promotion strategy of standardization work items in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). This paper focuses on a method of setting standardization promotion strategies for each item of personal information security standardization. As a decision making tool, the Importance Performance Anaysis (IPA) is applied and analyzed to the decision processes. The results are showed and illustrated for useful inputs to practical policy making in the field of standardization activities.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.158-164
• /
• 2007

Supply Chain Management (SCM) system is a critical investment that can affect the competitiveness and performance of a company. Selection of a right SCM system is one of the critical issues. This paper presents the characteristic factors of SCM system and a Fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision-making model for SCM system evaluation and selection. This study focuses on quantitative factors, applying the fuzzy concept to various evaluative factors. The proposed model can systematically construct the objectives of SCM system selection to achieve the business goals. A empirical example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed model and the model can help a company to make better decision-making in the SCM system selection problem.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2020

국방 무기체계 연구개발 과정에서 관련 규정이나 지침에 명시되지 않았지만, 연구개발 주관기관 내부적으로도 합리적인 대안 선택의 문제가 많이 발생한다. 대안 선택에 있어서 합리적인 과정이 적용되지 않으면 사업진행에 차질을 초래할 수 있으며, 이로 인해 사업기간 연장이나 추가 자원이 투입되는 상황도 발생된다. 특히 국내 미사일 연구개발 시 시험평가를 위한 많은 의사결정 과제들이 도출되며, 대표적인 것 중의 하나가 시험장 선정의 문제이다. 대안이 되는 시험장의 우선순위만 판단해야 한다면 델파이 기법(Delphi Method)이나 분석적계층과정(Analytic Hirarchy Process)을 활용할 수 있지만, 비용의 투입요소가 고려된다면 자료포락분석(Data Envelopment Analysis) 더 적합하다. 본 연구에서는 미사일 시험 시 발생되는 다양한 의사결정의 문제들을 염출해 보고, 이를 합리적으로 해결할 수 있는 의사결정의 방법이 제시된다. 제시된 의사결정의 프레임워크(Framework)는 국외 시험장을 선정하는 문제와 연관하여 모의 사례연구(Simulated Case Study)로 적용 과정이 연구된다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2007년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2007

Recently a multi-attribute structure analysis method is one of the evident areas of important points in the decision support system analysis. This research developed an internet/intranet-based solution builder for a three-step decision support system using fuzzy-AHP in the view of 1) brainstorming far the idea generation, 2) fuzzy-AHP (fuzzy analytic hierarchy process) as a multi-attribute structured analysis method and 3) aggregation logic model to integrate the results of individual analysis. We applied this decision support system to the make-or-buy decision problem for school foodservice system considering the multi-attributes in the decision making. A computer program is developed and demonstrated it internet/intranet-based decision problem. It was known that this solution builder provides decision makers a good tool for mate-of-buy group decision making.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.544-549
• /
• 2008

교육행정정보시스템(NEIS)은 인터넷을 통하여 학교와 그 상위기관간의 행정 업무를 연계하기 위하여 정부에 의해 주도된 교육 분야의 혁신적 프로젝트이다. NEIS는 교육행정업무에 대한 재설계와 정보화 전략에 따라 행정서식을 표준화하여 교원의 업무를 경감시켜 보다 나은 품질의 교육을 제공하고 온라인을 통해 관련된 교육 문제를 해결하기 위해 도입되었다. 본 논문은 NEIS의 효과적인 활용에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 도출하여 이를 계층화하고, 다중 의사결정기법을 이용하여 핵심요인간의 상대적인 중요도 평가를 통해 NEIS의 효과적인 활용방안을 모색하고자 한다. 분석결과는 NEIS의 사용자들의 만족도 제고와 향후 NEIS의 개선 전략을 개발하는데 유용하게 사용될 수 있다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권11호
• /
• pp.843-851
• /
• 2020

This study focuses on identifying and prioritizing the broader performance measures for the service supply chains by taking the case of Majan Electricity Company, Sohar, in the Sultanate of Oman. For an examination of the uniformity of ultimate objectives and the priorities therein, two strata of respondents with a total of fourteen respondents were approached for their valuable insights. Suitable structured instruments were personally administered to elicit the insightful and worthy responses. The two multi-criteria decision-making techniques, namely, the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and the Best-Worst Method were used to reach a meaningful prioritization of the identified and refined broader performance measurement dimensions. The results show that there exists a minor gap between the two respondents' groups in terms of their prioritizations. The major finding points to the difference in terms of the topmost priorities as revealed by the two set of respondents. For one group of respondents, the customer satisfaction matters the most, whereas for the other group, it is the overall profitability that matters the most. This gap against the utopian state assists in concluding that there is a requirement to reorient the employees so as to have a shared and common understanding of the organizational priorities.