• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.825-830
• /
• 2005

Traffic control is the center of the railway traffic control system. The main objective of railway traffic control system is to minimize delays, providing the customers with on-time train operating service according to the given train schedule. Particularly, within the station control area, the departure & arrival of train. the decision on the train priority and the shunting of train are decided by the authority of the local traffic controller. Therefore, it is necessary to have a lot of information and communications between each departments. And for such decision making of the local traffic controller, not only the communication between each stations are needed, but also the communication between other stations are needed too. In this paper, we have analyzed the main work of the local traffic controller in large scale stations and have designed the station traffic control system needed to be built within the station considering the local traffic. And we have proposed not only the communication with other system within station, but also the communication methods for communications with the neighboring stations.

• 한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.211-219
• /
• 2008

본 논문은 기존의 접근제어 모델을 확장하여 상황인식 기반 접근제어 모델을 제안하였다. 본 논문에서 xoRBAC와 CAAC와 같은 상황인식기반 보안모델에 대한 최근연구들을 조사하였다. 정확한 정책평가를 위해 기존의 CAAC 보안모델에 상황브로커와 파인더 컴포넌트를 추가하였다. 이 보안모델에 의해 더욱 명확한 정책결정을 위해 상황정보 및 상황결정정보를 보다 용이하게 수집할 수 있다. 또한, 접근된 자원에서 또 한번의 사용자 이벤트를 판단하여, 접근할 수 있는 모든 가능한 자원들을 제어하였다. 본 논문에서 제안된 보안모델은 역할에 따른 특정정책과 제약조정을 통해 다양한 보안등급 및 접근권한방식을 동적으로 제공할 수 있다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.85-98
• /
• 2014

Purpose - This study primarily aims to represent the current trend of research on CPFR as a promising supply chain collaboration program and proposes a new framework for analyzing any collaboration programs in terms of three key collaborative features. Research design, data, and methodology - This study employs a literature review of selected studies that conduct research on CPFR. CPFR is analyzed based on the proposed framework that characterizes collaboration programs in terms of three key collaborative features. Results - The analysis based on the proposed framework reveals that the current form of CPFR continues to have some collaborative features that are not fully utilized to create an advanced collaboration program. The literature review indicates that most past studies ignore critical issues including the dynamic nature of the multiple-stage supply chain system and negotiation process for collaborative agreement in CPFR implementation. Conclusions - Results indicate that CPFR can become a better supply chain collaboration program by incorporating coordinative cost payment and joint decision making processes. Based on observations on the existing literature of CPFR, this study indicates several important issues to be addressed by future studies.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.362-379
• /
• 2015

In this study, Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) construction schedule delay risk assessment methodology is developed and the construction delay risk is assessed for turnkey international NPP projects. Three levels of delay factors were selected through literature review and discussions with nuclear industry experts. A questionnaire survey was conducted on the basis of an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Relative Importance Index (RII) methods and the schedule delay risk is assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by severity and frequency of occurrence of delay factors. This study assigns four main delay factors to the first level: main contractor, utility, regulatory authority, and financial and country factor. The second and the third levels are designed with 12 sub-factors and 32 sub-sub-factors, respectively. This study finds the top five most important sub-sub-factors, which are as follows: policy changes, political instability and public intervention; uncompromising regulatory criteria and licensing documents conflicting with existing regulations; robust design document review procedures; redesign due to errors in design and design changes; and worldwide shortage of qualified and experienced nuclear specific equipment manufacturers. The proposed combined AHP-RII methodology is capable of assessing delay risk effectively and efficiently. Decision makers can apply risk informed decision making to avoid unexpected construction delays of NPPs.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.253-259
• /
• 2015

The fast neutron reactor BOR-60 is one of the key experimental facilities worldwide to perform large-scale tests of fuel, absorbing, and structural materials for advanced reactors. The BOR-60 reactor was put into operation in December 1969, and by the end of 2014 it had been operating on power for ~265,000 hours. BOR-60 still demonstrates potential capabilities to extend the lifetime of sodium-cooled fast reactors. The BOR-60 lifetime should have expired at the end of 2014. Over the past few years, a great scope of work has been performed to justify the possibility of extending its lifetime. The work included inspection of the equipment conditions, calculations and experimental research on operating parameters and the conditions of nonremovable components, investigation of the structural material samples after their long-term operation under irradiation, etc. Based on the results of the work performed, the residual lifetime was evaluated and the reactor operator made a decision to extend the lifetime period of the BOR-60 reactor. After considering both a set of documents about the reactor conditions and the positive decision of independent experts, the Regulatory Authority of the Russian Federation extended the BOR-60 operating license up to 2020.

• 기술사
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.40-44
• /
• 2011

Nuclear energy in Korea began in 1958, when the Korea's atomic energy act was formulated and the relevant organizations were founded. Since then, notwithstanding the two catastrophe like TMI and Chernobyl accident, Korea made a wise decision to expand the peaceful uses of the nuclear energy as well as to localize the essential nuclear design technology of fuel and nuclear steam supply system. This decision resulted in the success of export of nuclear power plants as well as research reactor in 2010s. The Korea's nuclear policy, which well utilized 'international crisis in nuclear business' as 'opportunity of Korea to get. nuclear technology', is believed nice policy as a role model of nuclear new-comer countries. Based upon the success story of localization of nuclear technology, Korea had an eye for a niche market, which was a basis of development of SMART, Korea-made integral PWR. The operation of a SMART plant can sufficiently provide not only electricity but also fresh water for 100,000 residents. Last two years, Korea's nuclear industry team led by the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute completed the standard design of SMART and applied to the Korea's regulatory body for standard design approval. Now the Korea's licensing authority is reviewing the design with the relevant documents, and the design team is doing its best to realize its hope to get the approval by the end of this year. From next year, the SMART business including construction and export will be explored by the KEPCO consortium.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.25-42
• /
• 2021

Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism based on the parties' agreement to resolve any disputes parties may have by arbitration rather than litigation in court. Parties' consent to arbitrate, which must be manifest in the parties' arbitration clause or agreement, is the foundation for arbitration; thus, the language of an arbitration agreement is often of utmost importance in determining the intent of the parties regarding many aspects of arbitration proceedings, such as, the scope of arbitral proceedings, arbitral seat, and authority of arbitral tribunals, among others. Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019) that ambiguity in arbitration agreement as to availability of class arbitration should be resolved in favor of individual arbitration, and therefore, class arbitration would be precluded. Such holding was met with criticism by four separate dissenting opinions, in which the dissenting Justices have disagreed with the majority's interpretation of the arbitration agreement at issue, as well as, its rejection of application of state law in resolving contractual ambiguity. This article analyzes the Supreme Court's decision and reviews the Court's approach in construction of the arbitration agreement. Nevertheless, because the Supreme Court declined to provide clear guidelines as to precisely what contractual basis is required to permit class arbitration, either silence or ambiguity in arbitration agreements will be resolved by disallowing class arbitration.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.29-46
• /
• 2022

Until recently, there has been a circuit split as to whether parties to foreign private arbitral proceedings could seek assistance from the U.S. courts for discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1782. The circuit courts have differed on the issue of whether a private arbitral proceeding may be considered a "proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal" in terms of the statute, which would ultimately allow or disallow judicial assistance in taking of evidence by the U.S. district courts for use in the requested proceedings. While the U.S. Supreme Court has addressed the applicability of §1782 in its Intel decision in 2004, it had not established a test as to what constitutes a foreign or international tribunal for the purposes of §1782, thereby leaving it open for lower courts to continue to interpret §1782 in their own ways, as requests for judicial assistance in taking of evidence are filed. In the recent decision of ZF Auto. US, Inc., v. Luxshare, Ltd., the Supreme Court has finally clarified that in order for an arbitral panel to be a "foreign or international tribunal" under §1782, such panels must exercise governmental authority conferred by one nation or multiple nations. Therefore, private commercial arbitral panels are not "foreign or international tribunal(s)" for the purposes of §1782 because they do not constitute governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative bodies. Such holding is necessary and legitimate for interested parties in international arbitration, as well as, potential parties of arbitration who are contemplating alternative dispute resolution for their dispute(s).

• 의료법학
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.43-82
• /
• 2019

치료행위 등 의료적 침습행위가 이루어지는 경우 환자의 자기결정권이 보장될 수 있도록 설명에 의한 동의가 요구된다. 그런데 우리 의료 실무에서는 환자의 소위 '보호자'에게 의료행위에 대해 설명하고 동의를 받는 일이 매우 빈번하다. 보호자 개념은 의료법에서 여러 번 등장하지만, 정작 보호자의 자격이나 범위는 명확하게 규정하지 않으며, 병원에서 사용하는 수술동의서 등에서도 어느 범위의 사람을 보호자로 포섭할 것인지는 정의하고 있지 않다. 보호자가 문제된 사건들로부터, 환자의 법률상 배우자나 친족관계에 있는 사람을 의료기관이 보호자로 인정하고 있음은 짐작할 수 있으나, 설령 그렇다 하더라도 환자의 가족이 당연히 그를 위한 법정대리인이 되는 것은 아니다. 이 논문에서는, 환자의 소위 보호자가 환자의 의료행위 결정에 관여하는 경우, 환자에게 동의능력이 없는 경우와 있는 경우를 나누어 보호자에게 어떤 법적 지위를 부여할 수 있는지 검토하였다. 환자 스스로 동의능력이 없어 의료행위에 대해 동의 여부를 결정할 능력이 결여되어 있는 경우, 비교법적으로 다양한 해결책이 제시되고 있지만 크게 환자와 일정한 관계에 있는 사람을 법정 의료행위 대행결정권자로 규정하는 방법과 의료행위 대행결정권자를 규정하지 않고 의사가 의료행위 여부를 결정하되 환자의 가족이나 친구와 상담을 하거나 그에게 설명하는 방법이 있다. 본 글에서는 전자의 해법을 택하는 경우의 문제점을 논증하고, 후자의 접근에서는 주치의가 단독으로 결정함으로써 우려되는 권한 남용이나 경솔한 결정의 문제를 회피하기 위해 주치의 외의 다른 의사나 위원회의 동의를 얻는 해결책을 제시하였다. 더 나아가 환자가 스스로 의료행위에 대해 동의 여부를 결정할 능력이 있음에도 불구하고 환자의 가족에게 환자의 상태를 설명하는 일도 실무에서 자주 일어난다. 환자와 가족 모두에게 설명하고 그로부터 동의를 받는 경우는 환자의 가족이 심리적으로 약해진 환자의 이해능력을 보충해주고 그의 결정을 심리적으로 지지해주는 긍정적인 효과가 기대되지만, 반대로 가족 본인의 이익을 위해 환자에게 불리한 결정을 하도록 연약한 상태의 환자를 조종할 가능성도 배제할 수 없다. 후자의 위험을 최대한 억제하기 위해서는 환자의 가족과 환자가 분리된 상태에서 환자의 의료행위에 대한 동의 여부를 다시 한번 확인하는 방법을 생각해 볼 수 있다. 환자와 환자의 가족 사이의 공동의사결정에서, 환자의 자기결정권의 실질적 보장 문제는 법학계에서는 다소 생소한 주제이기는 하나, 우리 사회처럼 의료행위 동의여부 결정에 가족의 관여도가 높은 사회에서는 앞으로도 계속 고민해야 할 주제일 것이다.

• 한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.67-96
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 한 개인이 내린 윤리적 의사결정이 개인중심 성향이나 집단중심 성향과 같은 개인의 문화성향과 상호작용하는지를 분석하는데 있다. 이를 위해 연구 1(N=92)에서는 개인의 문화성향에 따라 다수의 이익이 부각되거나 소수의 희생이 강조되는 상황에서 윤리적 의사결정의 차이가 나타나는지를 비교하였다. 그 결과 다수의 이익이 부각되는 상황에서는 공리주의적 입장에 대한 선호가 더 컸고, 소수의 희생이 강조되는 상황에서는 의무론적 입장에 대한 선호가 더 컸다. 또한 문화성향에 따른 도덕판단 기준의 중요성을 평정하게 했을 때, 개인중심성향에서는 위해와 공정의 기준을, 집단중심성향에서는 위해, 내 집단, 공정과 권위를 모두 도덕판단의 중요한 기준으로 인식하였다. 연구 2(N=30)에서는 개인 또는 집단을 어휘판단과제를 통해 점화시킨 후, 윤리적 의사결정의 과정을 마우스추적기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 도덕판단에서 '네'와 '아니오'의 최종적 반응으로 이어지는 경로를 마우스궤적으로 분석한 결과, 소수의 희생이 부각되면 개인점화조건에서는 집단점화조건에 비해 마우스편차와 X축 방향전환횟수가 더 컸다. 또한 내집단과 연관된 행동을 판단할 때, 개인점화조건에서는 집단점화조건보다 마우스편차가 더 큰 경향성이 나타났다. 마우스편차의 증가는 자동적인 정서의 과정을 통제하면서, 다른 대안적인 응답을 동시에 고려하는 사고과정임을 생각할 때, 이 결과는 문화성향과 갈등상황에 따라 도덕판단의 과정이 달라질 가능성을 시사한다.