• 제목/요약/키워드: Decentralized Autonomous Organization, DAO

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.009초

탈중앙화된 자율 조직 의사결정을 위한 도구 (A Decision Making Tool for Decentralized Autonomous Organization)

  • 이요셉;박용범
    • 반도체디스플레이기술학회지
    • /
    • 제19권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-10
    • /
    • 2020
  • Blockchain enabled Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), a new form of organization with conveying its core value - trust. Token holders who are participating DAO's governance share their thoughts, information, and ideas in online forum. But it is problem that chronological form of DAO's online forum makes token holders hard to find crucial information, meaning that many of them might not understand what is happening discussion. In this paper, we studied not only a decision making process which feature is iteration, visualization, and applicable to DAO with 6 steps in total but also a decision making tool which is based on the process of this paper. The tool has features to help participants such as voting model, visualization features which gives guidance to them for their decision during the process. Our experiment showed that the process and tool is somewhat reasonable, and the information during the process is effective for participants. This work is expected to be applied to current DAOs to make a decision among the token holders.

메타버스 운영조직으로서 탈중앙화자율조직(DAO) 사례분석: 디센트럴랜드를 중심으로 (Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) as a Metaverse Governance: A Case Study of Decentraland DAO)

  • 한진영;이현정
    • 경영정보학연구
    • /
    • 제26권1호
    • /
    • pp.151-172
    • /
    • 2024
  • 가상세계에서의 사회경제적 활동을 지원하는 메타버스는 미래 웹 3.0 비즈니스의 핵심이 될 공간으로서 언급된다. 그러나 현재 대부분의 주요 메타버스 플랫폼은 웹 2.0 체제를 고수하며 중앙집권형으로 운영되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 웹 3.0 형태에서 탈중앙화 자율조직인 DAO로 운영되는 메타버스 플랫폼인 디센트럴랜드의 사례를 살펴보며 메타버스 운영형태에 대해 고찰하였다. 사례분석 결과, 디센트럴랜드는 수평적 운영구조, 공정한 수익배분, 투명성 등의 긍정적인 특징을 가졌지만, 운영 과정에서 중앙화로의 회귀 가능성, 자율적 체계의 악용가능성, 의사 결정의 비효율성 등의 한계점도 포착되었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 DAO 거버넌스로의 전환 시점에 대해 논의하고, 비즈니스 지속성을 위한 노력, 자율적 운영을 위한 조정의 필요성을 시사점으로 제시하였다. 디센트럴랜드 DAO의 긍정적인 특징과 한계성을 바탕으로 본 연구에서 제시하는 시사점은 메타버스 뿐 아니라 웹 3.0을 지향하는 플랫폼 운영에 대해 실무적 측면과 아울러 이론적인 체계를 마련해가는 측면에서도 기여점이 있다.

Web3.0 Video Streaming Platform from the Perspective of Technology, Tokenization & Decentralized Autonomous Organization

  • Song, Minzheong
    • International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
    • /
    • 제16권2호
    • /
    • pp.149-160
    • /
    • 2024
  • For examining Web3.0 video streaming (VS) platforms in terms of the decentralized technology, tokenization and decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), we look at four platforms like DLive, DTube, Livepeer, and Theta Network (Theta). As a result, DLive which firstly partnered with Medianova for CDN and with Theta for peer to peer (P2P) network and migrates to Tron blockchain (BC), receives no commission from what creators earn, gives rewards to viewers by measuring engagement, and incentivizes participation by allowing 20% of donation & fees for funding development, 5% to BitTorrent Token (BTT) stakeholders (among these 5%, 20% to partners, 80% to other BTT stakeholders). DTube on its own lower-layer BC, Avalon, offers InterPlanetary File System (IPFS), gives 90% of the created value to creators or curators, and try to empower the community. Livepeer on Ethereum BC offers decentralized CDN, P2P, gives Livepeer Token (LPT) as incentive for network participants, and delegators can stake their LPT to orchestrators doing good. Theta on its native BC pulls streams from peering caching nodes, creates P2P network, gives Theta utility token, TFUEL for caching or relay nodes contributors, and allows Theta governance token, THETA as staking token. We contribute to the categorization of Web3.0 VS platforms: DLive and DTube reduce the risk of platform censorship, promote the diverse content, and allow the community to lead to more user-friendly environments. On the other hand, Livepeer and Theta provide new methods to stream content, but they have some differences. Whereas Livepeer focuses on the transcoding layer, Theta concentrates both on the video application layer and content delivery layer. It means, Theta tries to deliver value to all participants by enhancing network quality, reducing CDN cost, and rewarding users in utility tokens for the storage and bandwidth they provide.