• 제목/요약/키워드: Daniel

검색결과 884건 처리시간 0.027초

현대 공공 공간과 공공미술의 상호 작용에 관한 연구 - 다니엘 뷰렌의 작품을 중심으로 - (A study on the Interactive relationship between the public space and the public art - Focused on the Works of Daniel Buren -)

  • 김현정
    • 한국실내디자인학회논문집
    • /
    • 제16권2호
    • /
    • pp.147-154
    • /
    • 2007
  • This study places a great emphasis on the approaches to the space environment we inhabit, which I hope will contribute to generating a number of creative possibilities. Looking into 'site-specificity' which is characteristic by public art in public space method based on Daniel Buren's works 'in situ', this study analyze the relationship between the public space and works of art as a perspective of public art. The characteristics of his 'in situ' works that intervened works exist as space consisting of serial factors not simply art-object, and they suggest 'site Is a work'. The case study of Daniel Buren's public art project represented the results, the site marketing and serves as a guideline for the future of true Art/Space experiments. This study verifies the need for the arts and the space to work together in order to develop more creative and conceptual approaches to innovation and presentation. This cooperation is the continuation of space design by other means.

다니엘 리베스킨트 전시공간을 통해 본 조형적 내러티브 연구 (A Study on the Formative Narrative Seen from the Exhibition Space of Architect Daniel Libeskind)

  • 김영을
    • 한국실내디자인학회논문집
    • /
    • 제21권2호
    • /
    • pp.207-214
    • /
    • 2012
  • Today, museum exhibition can be divided into two sub-categories: a. informative exhibition with various useful auxiliary media to convey knowledge and b. appreciative exhibition considering aesthetic conveyance and visual/perceptual environment. In addition to this, the concept of memorial exhibition as a field that tangible and intangible memories are transmitted and reproduced is creating another genre of exhibition. As an example of such a memorial exhibition above, the work of de-constructive architect Daniel Libeskind was selected. Jewish Museum and Imperial War Museum North both of which maximized the exhibition space by grafting architectural language to exhibition narrative were analyzed and compared to see if the same architectural language can be displayed differently in another form of exhibition after being drawn into the exhibition space depending on the changes in time and perspective. Therefore, in the narrative display combining the selection of exhibition contents and storytelling, the formative language of space can confirm that exhibition narrative as an ending structure changed into a retelling story with more extended meanings through interactive factors. Eventually, in this formative narrative, when the display of historical facts and exhibition themes is combined with the architectural language in an exhibition hall according to the approach direction, the memorial exhibition can create a formative language stimulating sensibility in the memories of space and a differentiated formative exhibition space where one is truly moved by oneness of contents.

  • PDF

기호론적 관점에 기초한 홀로코스트 건축의 상징성 분석 - 다니엘 리베스킨드의 유대인 박물관을 중심으로 - (The symbolism analysis of Holocaust architecture on the basis of semiotics point of view - Focus on Daniel Libeskind's Jewish Museum Berlin -)

  • 이승연;이성훈
    • 한국실내디자인학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국실내디자인학회 2007년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.270-274
    • /
    • 2007
  • Clearing trace of symbol which was gone with a series of pre-modern architecture history since the modern architecture (pursuing true nature from tradition which is repeated and imitated unconsciously). That is, What is the course of deconstruction? In the early part of the 20th century, We still accept the necessity of decoration in spite of its existence at one time being threaten. This means, even though symbolism in architecture has relative importance by situation of Times, it plays an important role to add the past to current style through 'Symbol'. The history of Times, a carrier which reflects Present on New Futures, makes memory by gathering data but we can not amplify our historical imagination with only data. Data is a past memory and evidence but we can not substitute that for historical experience. And it is difficult for future generations who don't live through that history to change their historical recognition with recollecting memories. They have to draw history with data but it is very limited in itself. However, They can collect historical memory through symbol in architecture. In this study, We pay attention to the symbolism of a memorial hall architecture. So We'll analyze dichotomy concept of Barthes's signifiant and signifie, visual sign and course of symbolic meaning on basis of Daniel Libeskind's Jewish Museum.

  • PDF