• 과학기술정책
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.62-70
• /
• 2008

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.119-132
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 3DTV 관련 주요 정책 쟁점을 단말기와 설비제조 단위가 아니라 플랫폼 사업단위에서 고찰하고자 했다. 플랫폼 사업 단위에서 현재까지의 3D 정책이 어떤 문제를 가지고 있으며, 3DTV가 방송시장에 상용화되었을 경우 나타날 수 있는 쟁점을 논의하고자 한다. 주요쟁점으로는 지상파 플랫폼의 주파수 정책, 유료 플랫폼 사업자의 부가서비스 활성화, 그리고 지상파 콘텐츠 재전송과 광고시장 정책에 대하여 논의하고 전망을 고찰하고자 한다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.14-26
• /
• 2013

The $1^{st}$ National Plan for Aging Society with Low Fertility, which the Korean government announced in 2006, caused the gradual increase of R&D investment in order to prepare for an aging society in Korea. This study explores if the directions and strategies of R&D projects related to aging are suitable to improve the quality of life for elderly people and establish a sustainable aging society by analyzing the features of R&D investment from 2004 to 2010. The results show that most R&D projects conducted by departments focus on the development of assistive devices for the elderly to support everyday lives. The Korean government's R&D policy to prepare for an aging society is based on the narrow interpretation of Quality of Life (QoL) in an aging society that tries to resolve the socioeconomic problems of the elderly; however, the policies have ignored the independence of active elderly individuals and the social integration of the young and elderly generations. The research shows that a paradigm shift is required from a 'Senior' to 'Aging Society' because almost 1/3 of the Korean population is over 65 years old and the expansion of the research embraces from assistive technologies for the elderly to the design of social infrastructure such as transportation, education and work.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.819-839
• /
• 2009

R&D 규모의 확대는 평가의 효과성과 효율성 제고가 전제이다. R&D 예산 및 사업에 관한 시스템 평가는 예산의 조정 배분과 사업의 성과에 대한 평가로 구분된다. 이 논문은 예산의 조정 배분과 관련한 예산평가 시스템의 운영 측면에서 효율성 및 효과성을 제고하는 것에 중점을 둔 연구이다. 예산평가 시스템의 핵심 관점은 두 가지이다. 하나는 후행단계에서 이루어지는 사업에 대한 조사 분석과 평가의 관점을 예산평가에 보다 긴밀하게 연계시키는 것이며, 다른 하나는 이를 위해서 전반적인 종합조정의 시스템을 재조명하는 것이다. 예산은 정책 기획 집행으로 연결되는 과정이다. 사업을 매개체로 하여 정책에 부합하는 기획내용에 따라 예산을 활용하여 집행하는 것이 바람직한 것이다. 따라서 연구개발사업의 구조 체계와 예산항목(코드) 구조와의 연계 강화가 중요하다. 이것은 의사결정 시스템 차원에서 정책과 예산의 연계와 함께 이루어져야 한다. 또한 예산의 조정 배분, 정책과 사업의 성과평가, 연구개발사업 조사 분석 관련 시스템 상의 연계 강화와 운영일정에 대한 개선이 필요하다. 이를 위해서는 국가과학기술위원회(NSTC)의 기능이 정책기획 중심이 되어야 하며 정책부터 평가까지의 전과정상 객관성과 공정성이 확보될 수 있는 운영지원 체계로 개편되어야 한다. 조정 배분과 성과평가가 유기적으로 연계되는 평가 시스템이 되려면 이들의 집행일정과 조사 분석의 내용과 시기가 보다 효용성이 높아져야 한다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.99-110
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to suggest agenda priorities for nursing service R&D (Research and Development) related policies development. Methods: Two steps in developing the agendas and priorities were performed in this descriptive study. First, nursing service R&D agendas were extracted through needs assessment of nursing researchers and practitioners. Then, the priority of agendas was set by Analytic Hierarchy Process by ten experts who were representatives of nursing and other healthcare professionals. Results: Six core areas and forty-six nursing service R&D agendas were developed. The priority of agendas was different according to the evaluation criteria depending on weight value of nursing services. Conclusion: In order to select and promote nursing service R&D projects within national healthcare policy, nursing service R&D policy should be proposed with consideration to the importance of the criteria in reflecting characteristics of nursing care. By strengthening R&D capabilities for quality improvement and sensitive awareness of national directions for healthcare R&D policies, nursing service R&D can be appropriately promoted.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2010

To achieve the "low carbon green growth" vision, the first step is securing core technologies. Therefore, S&T policy direction for green technology development is urgently needed. As of 2008, investment in green technology (GT) development hovered around 10% of the government's total R&D budget. Thus, the Korean government developed a plan to increase that percentage to 15%, by 2013. To develop reasonable investment strategies for green technology development, targeted strategies that reflect technology and market changes by green technology area are needed. However, the overall planning and coordination of national GT development is currently split among, approximately, 10 government ministries. To establish an efficient green technology development system, the so-called "Green Technology R&D Council" should be launched in collaboration with the Presidential Committee on Green Growth and the National Science and Technology Council. Furthermore, to build a solid foundation for commercializing the outcomes of GT development projects and promote GT transfer, the government should undertake two initiatives. First, the government should reinforce GT R&D performance management, by establishing a GT R&D performance management and evaluation system. Second, the government should implement the "customized packaged support for promoting green technology business rights and commercialization" and present "e-marketplace for market-oriented green technologies". Creating a pan-ministerial policy for GT development policy would necessitate restructuring the HR(Human Resources) development system, which is currently separated by technology area. Based upon mid/long-term HR supply and demand forecasts, the government should design differentiated HR development projects, continuously evaluate those projects, and reflect the evaluation results in future policy development. Finally, to create new GT-related industries, the "Green TCS (Testing, Certification, and Standards) System" needs to be implemented. For objective evaluation and diffusion of R&D results by green technology area, a common standardization plan for testing, analysis, and measurement, like the "Green TCS", should be developed and integrated.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.561-589
• /
• 2015

그동안 과학기술정책은 연구개발 투자규모를 늘여서 논문이나 특허 같은 연구성과물을 창출해내는데 집중되어 왔다. 하지만, 과학기술의 경제적 역할이 강조되고 창조경제가 부각되면서, 기술사업화에 대한 정책적 관심이 높아지고 있다. 정부가 추진하는 기술사업화란 공공연구기관의 연구성과물이 민간 기업에서 상용화될 수 있도록 지원하는 일련의 혁신과정을 일컫는데, 조직 외부로의 지식(공공기술)의 흐름과 확산을 수반한다는 점에서 유출-개방형 기술혁신과 그 맥을 같이한다고 볼 수 있다. 본고는 이러한 견지에서, 주요 경제부처(미래창조과학부, 산업통상자원부, 중소기업청)의 기술사업화 예산사업에 대한 분석을 하였다. 이를 통해 현재의 기술사업화 정책현황을 진단하고 향후 정책과제를 도출하였다. 본고는 기술사업화 예산사업이 (1) 부처별로 특화되고, (2) 기술이전에 대한 지원을 강화하며, (3) 통합적 연계를 통해 지원 스펙트럼을 확대하고, (4) 엑셀러레이터 같은 민간 전문가 그룹을 육성하는 방향으로 추진될 것을 정책제언으로 제시하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.67-73
• /
• 2011

Using the known result of the expected busy period for a controllable M/G/1 queueing model operating under the triadic Max (N, T, D) policy, its upper and lower bounds are derived to approximate its corresponding actual value. Both bounds are represented in terms of the expected busy periods for the dyadic Min (N, T), Min (N, D) and Min (T, D) and simple N, T and D operating policies. All three input variables N, T and D are equally contributed to construct such bounds for better estimation.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.97-104
• /
• 2010

Using the known result of the expected busy period for the triadic Min (N, T, D) operating policy applied to a controllable M/G/1 queueing model, its upper and lower bounds are derived to approximate its corresponding actual value. Both bounds are represented in terms of the expected busy periods for the dyadic Min (N, T), Min (N, D) and Min (T, D) and simple N, T and D operating policies. All three input variables N, T and D are equally contributed to construct such bounds for better approximations.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 International Conference on Digital Policy & Management
• /
• pp.145-168
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion overfive years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400-million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.